Skip to main content
Log in

Recruiting faculty: Complementary tales from two campuses

  • AIR Forum Issue
  • Published:
Research in Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper—a complement to “Retaining Faculty: A Tale of Two Campuses” (Matier, 1990)—examines the factors influencing individuals with firm offers to join the faculty at two research universities. Particular attention is paid to the relative weight and importance placed on the tangible, intangible, and non-work-related benefits in the decision-making process. Comparisons are drawn to previous faculty recruitment studies and to the complementary retention study, as well as between the urban and rural subject universities. Given that faculty are an institution's most valuable asset, and that in some fields they are either already in short supply or will be soon, the methods and findings of this research should interest those concerned with developing and maintaining a quality faculty.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bowen, H. R., and Schuster, J. H. (1986).American Professors: A National Resource Imperiled. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, W. G., and Sosa, J. A. (1989).Prospects for Faculty in the Arts and Sciences: A Study of Factors Affecting Demand and Supply, 1987 to 2012. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, D. L. (1988).A New Academic Marketplace. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caplow, T., and McGee, R. J. (1958).The Academic Marketplace. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, J. R., and Cole, S. (1973).Social Stratification in Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, L. V., Lindzey, G., and Coggleshall, P. E. (eds.) (1982).An Assessment of Research-Doctorate Programs in the United States. Washington: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarsfeld, P. F., and Rosenberg, M. (1958). The empirical analysis of action: Introduction. In P. F. Lazarsfeld and M. Rosenberg (eds.),The Language of Social Research: A Reader in the Methodology of Social Research (pp. 387–391). New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, J. S. (1978). Productivity and academic position in the scientific career.American Sociological Review 43: 889–908.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, J. S., Allison, P. D., and McGinnis, R. (1979). Entrance into the academic career.American Sociological Review 44: 816–830.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matier, M. W. (1986). Factors influencing “star” faculty attrition at institutions of higher education: An analysis of the University of Oregon's faculty in the College of Arts and Sciences, 1976/77–1984/85 (Doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon, 1985).Dissertation Abstracts International 46: 3266A.

  • Matier, M. W. (1988). Factors influencing faculty migration. Paper presented at the annual forum of the Association for Institutional Research, Phoenix, AZ. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 298 846.

  • Matier, M. W. (1990). Retaining faculty: A tale of two campuses.Research in Higher Education 31: 39–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGinnis, R., and Long, J. S. (1988). Entry into academia: Effects of stratification, geography and ecology. In D. W. Breneman and T. I. K. Youn (eds.),Academic Labor Markets and Careers (pp. 28–51). Philadelphia: The Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew effect in science.Science 159(3810): 56–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reskin, B. (1979). Academic sponsorship and scientist careers.Sociology of Education 52: 129–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salancik, G. R., and Pfeffer, J. (1978). A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design.Administrative Science Quarterly 23: 224–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stecklein, J. E., and Lathrop, R. L. (1960).Faculty Attraction and Retention: Factors Affecting Faculty Mobility at the University of Minnesota. Minneapolis: Bureau of Institutional Research, University of Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

  • Youn, T. I. K., and Zelterman, D. (1988). Institutional career mobility in academia. In D. W. Breneman and T. I. K. Youn (eds.),Academic Labor Markets and Careers (pp. 52–73). Philadelphia: The Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, H. (1970). Stratification in American science. In E. O. Laumann (ed.),Social Stratification (pp. 235–257). Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Matier, M.W. Recruiting faculty: Complementary tales from two campuses. Res High Educ 32, 31–44 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992831

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992831

Keywords

Navigation