Abstract
This paper—a complement to “Retaining Faculty: A Tale of Two Campuses” (Matier, 1990)—examines the factors influencing individuals with firm offers to join the faculty at two research universities. Particular attention is paid to the relative weight and importance placed on the tangible, intangible, and non-work-related benefits in the decision-making process. Comparisons are drawn to previous faculty recruitment studies and to the complementary retention study, as well as between the urban and rural subject universities. Given that faculty are an institution's most valuable asset, and that in some fields they are either already in short supply or will be soon, the methods and findings of this research should interest those concerned with developing and maintaining a quality faculty.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bowen, H. R., and Schuster, J. H. (1986).American Professors: A National Resource Imperiled. New York: Oxford University Press.
Bowen, W. G., and Sosa, J. A. (1989).Prospects for Faculty in the Arts and Sciences: A Study of Factors Affecting Demand and Supply, 1987 to 2012. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Burke, D. L. (1988).A New Academic Marketplace. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, Inc.
Caplow, T., and McGee, R. J. (1958).The Academic Marketplace. New York: Basic Books.
Cole, J. R., and Cole, S. (1973).Social Stratification in Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Jones, L. V., Lindzey, G., and Coggleshall, P. E. (eds.) (1982).An Assessment of Research-Doctorate Programs in the United States. Washington: National Academy Press.
Lazarsfeld, P. F., and Rosenberg, M. (1958). The empirical analysis of action: Introduction. In P. F. Lazarsfeld and M. Rosenberg (eds.),The Language of Social Research: A Reader in the Methodology of Social Research (pp. 387–391). New York: The Free Press.
Long, J. S. (1978). Productivity and academic position in the scientific career.American Sociological Review 43: 889–908.
Long, J. S., Allison, P. D., and McGinnis, R. (1979). Entrance into the academic career.American Sociological Review 44: 816–830.
Matier, M. W. (1986). Factors influencing “star” faculty attrition at institutions of higher education: An analysis of the University of Oregon's faculty in the College of Arts and Sciences, 1976/77–1984/85 (Doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon, 1985).Dissertation Abstracts International 46: 3266A.
Matier, M. W. (1988). Factors influencing faculty migration. Paper presented at the annual forum of the Association for Institutional Research, Phoenix, AZ. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 298 846.
Matier, M. W. (1990). Retaining faculty: A tale of two campuses.Research in Higher Education 31: 39–60.
McGinnis, R., and Long, J. S. (1988). Entry into academia: Effects of stratification, geography and ecology. In D. W. Breneman and T. I. K. Youn (eds.),Academic Labor Markets and Careers (pp. 28–51). Philadelphia: The Falmer Press.
Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew effect in science.Science 159(3810): 56–63.
Reskin, B. (1979). Academic sponsorship and scientist careers.Sociology of Education 52: 129–146.
Salancik, G. R., and Pfeffer, J. (1978). A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design.Administrative Science Quarterly 23: 224–253.
Stecklein, J. E., and Lathrop, R. L. (1960).Faculty Attraction and Retention: Factors Affecting Faculty Mobility at the University of Minnesota. Minneapolis: Bureau of Institutional Research, University of Minnesota.
Youn, T. I. K., and Zelterman, D. (1988). Institutional career mobility in academia. In D. W. Breneman and T. I. K. Youn (eds.),Academic Labor Markets and Careers (pp. 52–73). Philadelphia: The Falmer Press.
Zuckerman, H. (1970). Stratification in American science. In E. O. Laumann (ed.),Social Stratification (pp. 235–257). Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Matier, M.W. Recruiting faculty: Complementary tales from two campuses. Res High Educ 32, 31–44 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992831
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992831