Skip to main content
Log in

Correlation of spatial contrast sensitivity and visual fields in glaucoma

  • Clinical Investigations
  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Perimetry is the standard examination in glaucoma, whereas contrast sensitivity is often proposed as a complementary test. This study investigates the extent to which the outcomes of the two tests correlate. One eye each of 44 glaucoma patients and 16 glaucoma suspects was tested with the Haag-Streit Visometer and the Octopus 201 perimeter (program G1). Contrast sensitivities correlated highest with the center of the visual field (Spearman's rho = 0.76;P < 0.001) and slightly less with the mean sensitivity of the entire visual field (rho = 0.63;P < 0.001). Mean contrast sensitivity correlated weakly with the square root of corrected loss variance (rho= −0.45;P < 0.001) and short-term fluctuation (rho = −0.34;P < 0.007). The two tests differed considerably only in very few patients. We recommend careful evaluation of the central area of glaucomatous visual fields whenever contrast sensitivity testing is not available.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arden GB, Jacobson JJ (1978) A simple grating test for contrast sensitivity: preliminary results indicate value in screening for glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 17:23–32

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Drance SM (1985) The early structural and functional disturbances of chronic open-angle glaucoma. Robert N Shaffer Lecture. Ophthalmology 92:853–857

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Drance SM, Airaksinen PJ, Price M, Schulzer M, Douglas GR, Transley B (1987) The use of psychophysical, structural, and electrodiagnostic parameters to identify glaucomatous damage. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 225:365–368

    Google Scholar 

  4. Flammer J (1986) The concept of visual field indices. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 224:389–392

    Google Scholar 

  5. Flammer J, Drance SM, Augustiny L, Funkhouser F (1985) Quantification of glaucomatous visual field defects with automated perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 26:176–181

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Flammer J, Jenni F, Bebie H, Keller B (1987) The OCTOPUS glaucoma program G1. Glaucoma 9:67–72

    Google Scholar 

  7. Friberg TR, Sanborn GE, Budd R (1987) Contrast sensitivity versus static visual field testing during experimental elevation of introcular pressure. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 227:345–347

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hitchings RA, Powell DJ, Arden GB, Carter RM (1981) Contrast sensitivity gratings in glaucoma family screening. Br J Ophthalmol 65:515–517

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Isomatsu Y (1985) Contrast visual acuity in primary open-angle glaucoma. Jpn J Clin Ophthalmol 39:633–636

    Google Scholar 

  10. Korth M, Horn F, Storck B, Jonas JB (1989) Spatial and spatiotemporal contrast sensitivity of normal and glaucoma eyes. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 227:428–435

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lotmar W (1980) Apparatus for the measurement of retinal visual acuity by moiré fringes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 19:393–400

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lundt BL (1985) Central contrast sensitivity test in the detection of early glaucoma. Acta Ophthahnol Copenh 63:481–486

    Google Scholar 

  13. Motolko MA, Phelps CD (1984) Contrast sensitivity in asymmetric glaucoma. International Ophthalmol 7:45–50

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rönne H (1909) Über das Gesichtsfeld beim Glaukom. Min Monatsbl Augenheilkd 47:12–33

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ross JE, Bron AJ, Clarke DD (1984) Contrast sensitivity and visual disability in chronic simple glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 68:821–827

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sample PA, Weinreb RN, Boynton RN (1986) Acquired dyschromatopsia glaucoma. Surv Ophthalmol 31:54–64

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Stamper RL (1985) The effect of glaucoma on central visual function. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 82:792–826

    Google Scholar 

  18. Stamper RL (1989) Psychophysical changes in glaucoma. Surv Ophthalmol [Suppl] 33:309–318

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tagami Y, Onuma T, Mizokami K, Isayama Y (1981) Comparison spatial contrast sensitivity with visual field in optic neuropathy and glaucoma. Doc Ophthalmol Proc Ser 26:147–154

    Google Scholar 

  20. Teoh SL, Allan D, Dutton GN, Foulds WS (1990) Brightness discrimination and contrast sensitivity in chronic glaucoma — a clinical study. Br J Ophthalmol 74:215–219

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Zulauf M, Flammer J, Chrenkova A, Signer C, Lotmar W, Wetterwald N (1984) Der Einfluß der Streifenrichtung von Interferenzmustern auf die Kontrastempfmdlichkeit bei weißem und farbigem Licht. Kl Monatsbl Augenheilkd 184:394–396

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zulauf M, Hammer J, Signer C (1988) Spatial brightness contrast sensitivity measured with white, green, red, and blue light. Ophthalmologica 196:43–48

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Mario Zulauf is a visiting research scientist at the Yale Eye Center, supported by the Florian Verry Foundation, Lausanne, Switzerland, and the Swiss National Fund.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zulauf, M., Flammer, J. Correlation of spatial contrast sensitivity and visual fields in glaucoma. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 231, 146–150 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00920937

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00920937

Keywords

Navigation