Skip to main content
Log in

Testing the “ecologically noble savage” hypothesis: Interspecific prey choice by Piro hunters of Amazonian Peru

  • Published:
Human Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Native peoples have often been portrayed as natural conservationists, living in “harmony” with their environment. It is argued that this perspective is a result of an imprecise definition of conservation that emphasizes effects rather than actual behavior. Using foraging theory as a contrast, an operational definition of conservation is offered. Foraging theory assumes that foragers will behave to maximize their short-term harvesting rate. Hunting decisions that are costly in terms of short-term harvest rate maximization, yet increase the sustainability of the harvest are deemed conservation. Using this definition, alternative hypotheses are tested using data on the inter-specific prey choice decisions of a group of subsistence hunters, the Piro of Amazonian Peru. Results indicate that hunters do not show any restraint from harvesting species identified as vulnerable to over-hunting and local extinction. Decisions are made that are consistent with predictions of foraging theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altmann, J. (1974). Observational study of behavior: sampling methods.Behavior 49: 227–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvard, M. (1993). Testing the Ecologically Noble Savage Hypothesis: Conservation and Subsistence Hunting by the Piro of Amazonian Peru. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvard, M. (in press). Conservation by native peoples? Prey choice in a depleted area.Human Nature.

  • Alvard, M., and Kaplan, H. (1991). Procurement technology and prey mortality among indigenous neotropical hunters. In Stiner, M. (ed.),Human Predators and Prey Mortality. Westview Press, Boulder, pp. 79–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlin, O., and Berlin, E. (1977).Etnobiología, Subsistencia y Nutritión en una Sociedad de la Selva Tropical: Los Aguaruna. University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodley, J. (1976).Anthropology and Contemporary Human Problems. Benjamin Cummings Publishing, Menlo Park, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodley, J. (1990).Victims of Progress (3rd Ed.). Mayfield Publishing, Moutainview, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgerhoff-Mulder, M., and Caro, T. (1985). The use of quantitative observational techniques in anthropology.Current Anthropology 26: 323–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunyard, P. (1989). Guardians of the Amazon.New Scientist 35: 38–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camino, A. (1977). Trueque, correrías e intercambios entre los Quechuas Andinos y los Piro y Machiguenga de la montaña Peruana.Amazonía Peruana 1: 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caughley, G. (1977).Analysis of Vertebrate Populations. John Wiley & Sons, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, C. (1990).Mathematical Bioeconomics: The Optimal Management of Renewable Resources. John-Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clay, J. (1988).Indigenous Peoples and Tropical Forests: Models of Land Use and Management from Latin America. Cultural Survival, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, L. (1954). The population consequences of life history phenomena.Quarterly Review of Biology 29: 103–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, J. (1986). The golden age that never was.Discover 9: 70–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fragoso, J. (1991). The effect of hunting on tapirs in Belize. InNeotropical Wildlife Use and Conservation. Robinson, J., and Redford, K. (eds.), Chicago University, Chicago, pp. 154–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentry. A. (1990).Four Neotropical Forests. Yale University Press, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, D. (1975). Protein capture and cultural development in the Amazon.American Anthropologist 77: 526–549.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hames, R. (1979). A comparison of the efficiencies of the shotgun and the bow in neotropical forest hunting.Human Ecology 7: 219–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hames, R. (1987). Game conservation or efficient hunting? In McCay, B., and Acheson, J. (eds.),The Question of the Commons. University of Arizona Press, Tucson, pp. 97–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hames, P. (1991). Wildlife Conservation in tribal societies. In Oldfield, M., and Alconn, J. (eds.),Biodiversity; Culture, Conservation and Ecodevelopment. Westview Press, Boulder, CO, pp. 172–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hames, R., and Vickers, W. (1982). Optimal diet breadth theory as a model to explain variability in Amazonian hunting.American Ethnologist 9: 357–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons.Science 162: 1243–1248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, M. (1977).Cannibals and Kings. Random House, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayne, D., and Gwynn, J. (1977). Percentage does in total kill as a harvest strategy.Proceedings of the Joint Northwest-Southwest Deer Study Group Meeting, pp. 117–127.

  • Keinen, J., and Low, B. (1992). Human Behavioral Ecology and environmental conservation.Environmental Conservation 19: 105–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennemann, W. (1983). Relationship among body mass, metabolic rate and the intrinsic rate of natural increase in mammals.Oecologia 56: 104–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, K., and Hawkes, K. (1983). Neotropical Hunting among the Ache of Eastern Paraguay. In Hames, R., and Vickers, W. (eds.),Adaptive Responses of Native Amazonians. Academic Press, New York, pp. 139–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, K., Kaplan, H., Hawkes, K., and Hurtado, A. (1987). Foraging decisions among Ache hunter-gatherers. New data and implications for optimal foraging models.Ethnology and Sociobiology 8: 1–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holdrige, L. (1967).Life Zone Ecology. Tropical Science Center, San José, Costa Rica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, J. (1983).American Indian Ecology. Texas Western Press, El Paso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunn, E. (1982). Mobility as a factor limiting resource use in the Columbia Plateau of North America. In Williams, N., and Hunn, E. (eds.),Resource Managers: North American and Australian Hunter-Gatherers. Westview Press, Boulder, pp. 17–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, H., and Hill, K. (1992). The evolutionary ecology of food acquisition. In Smith, E., and Winterhalder, B. (eds.),Evolutionary Ecology and Human behavior. New York, Aldine de Gruyter, pp. 167–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay, J. (1990).Yellowstone's Northern Elk Herd: A Critical Evaluation of the “Natural Regulation” Paradigm. Ph.D. dissertation, Utah State University, Logan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs, J., and McCleery, R. (1984). Optimization in behavioral ecology. In Krebs, J., and Davies, N. (eds.),Behavioral Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach. Sinauer Associates, pp. 91–121.

  • Kuchikura, Y. (1988). Efficiency and focus of blowgun hunting among Semaq Beri hunter-gatherers of peninsular Malaysia.Human Ecology 16: 271–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin, R. (1970). The units of selection.Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 1: 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur, R. (1960). On the relation between reproductive value and optimal predation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 46: 143–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCay, B., and Acheson, J. (eds.) (1987).The Question of the Commons. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCullogh, D. (1984). Lessons from the George Reserve, Michigan. In Halls, L. (eds.),White Tailed Deer: Ecology and Management. Stackpole Books, Harrisburg, PA, pp. 211–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, D. (1977). Food taboos: A primitive environmental protection agency:Anthropos 72: 734–748.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNamara, J., and Houston, A. (1987). Partial preferences and foraging.Animal Behavior 35: 1084–1099.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meggers, B. (1971).Amazonia: Man and Culture in a Counterfeit Paradise. Aldine-Atherton, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittermeier, R., and Cheney, D. (1987). Conservation of primates and their habitats. In Smuts, B., Cheney, D., Seyfarth, R., Wrangham, R., and Struhsakar, T. (eds.),Primate Societies. Chicago University Press, Chicago, pp. 477–490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nietschmann, B. (1978). Comments on Ross.Current Anthropology 19: 24–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posey, D. (1982). Indigenous ecological knowledge and development of the Amazon. In Moran, E. (ed.),The Dilemma of Amazonian Development University of Colorado, Boulder, pp. 225–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posey, D. (1985). Native and indigenous guidelines fore new Amazonian development strategies: Understanding biodiversity through ethnocology. In Hemming, J. (ed.),Change in the Amazon. Manchester University Press, Manchester, pp. 156–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyke, G., Pulliam, H., and Charnov, E. (1977). Optimal foraging: A selective review of theory and tests.Quarterly Review of Biology 52: 137–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redford, K. (1991). The ecologically noble savage.Orion 9: 24–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricker, W. (1954). Stock and recruitment.Journal of the Fish Research Board of Canada 11: 559–623.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J., and Redford, K. (1986). Intrinsic rate of natural increase in Neotropical forest mammals: Relationship to phylogeny and diet.Oecologia 68: 516–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J., and Ramirez, J. (1982). Conservation biology of neotropical primates.Special Publication of the Pymatuning Laboratory of Ecology 6: 329–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J., and Redford, K. (1991). Sustainable harvest of neotropical wildlife. In Robinson, J., and Redford, K. (eds.),Neotropical Wildlife Use and Conservation. Edited by University of Chicago, Chicago, pp. 415–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, A. (1991). Conserving resources for children.Human Nature 2: 73–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, E. (1978). Food taboos, diet, and hunting strategy: The adaptation to animals in Amazon cultural ecology.Current Anthropology 19: 1–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savidge, I., and Ziesenis, J. (1980). Sustained yield management. In Schmnitz, S. (ed.),Wildlife Management Techniques Manual. The Wildlife Society, Washington, D.C., pp. 405–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silva, J., and Strahl, S. (1991). Human impact on populations of chachalacas, guans, and currassows (Galliformes: Cracidae) in Venezuela. In Robinson, J., and Redford, K. (eds.),Neotropical Wildlife Use and Conservation. Chicago University Press, Chicago, pp. 37–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simms, S. (1992). Wilderness as human landscape. In Zeveloff, S., Vause, L., and McVaugh, W. (eds.),Wilderness Tapestry: An Eclectic Approach to Preservation. University of Nevada Press, Reno, Nevanda, pp. 183–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, E. (1983). Anthropological applications of optimal foraging theory: A critical theory.Current Anthropology 24: 625–651.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, E. (1991).Inujjuamiut Foraging Strategies: Evolutionary Ecology of an Arctic Hunting Economy. Aldine, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, E. (1992). Human behavioral ecology.Evolutionary Anthropology 1: 20–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speck, F. (1939). Aboriginal conservators.Bird Lore 40: 258–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephens, D., and Krebs, J. (1986).Foraging Theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terborgh, J. (1983).Five New World Primates. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terborgh, J., Fitzpatrick, J., and Emmons, L. (1984). An annotated list of the birds and mammals of Cocha Cashu Biological Station.Fieldiana 21: 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Western, D. (1983). Production, reproduction and size in mammals.Oecologia 59: 269–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G. (1966).Adaptation and Natural Selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wynne-Edwards, V. (1962).Animal Dispersion in Relation to Social Behavior. Hafner, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yost, J., and Kelly, P. (1983). Shotguns, blowguns, and spears: The analysis of technological efficiency. In Hames, R., and Vickers, W. (eds.),Adaptive Responses of Native Amazonians. Academic Press, New York, pp. 189–224.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The phrase “ecologically noble savage” was coined by Kent Redford (1991) in a thought provoking article of the same name.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Alvard, M.S. Testing the “ecologically noble savage” hypothesis: Interspecific prey choice by Piro hunters of Amazonian Peru. Hum Ecol 21, 355–387 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00891140

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00891140

Key words

Navigation