Skip to main content
Log in

The multivariate (co)variogram as a spatial weighting function in classification methods

  • Articles
  • Published:
Mathematical Geology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The multivariate variogram and the multivariate covariogram are used as spatial weighting functions for forming spatially homogeneous groups automatically. The groups are created after either deflating similarities between distant samples with the multivariate covariogram or by inflating dissimilarities between distant samples with the multivariate variogram. These approaches can be seen as generalization of the Oliver and Webster proposal. Two data sets show the efficiency of the two weighting functions when compared to the classical approach which does not take spatial information into account. In one case study, the weighting of similarities by the multivariate covariogram showed more interpretable results than the weighting of dissimilarities by the multivariate variogram.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beaumier, M., 1987, Géochimie des Sédiments de Lac de la Région de Schefferville, MB 87-32, M.E.R.Q., 382 p.

  • Bourgault, G., and Marcotte, D., 1991, Multivariable Variogram and Its Application to the Linear Model of Coregionalization: Math. Geol., v. 23, n. 7, p. 899–928.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, M., and Dagbert, M., 1974, Lakeview Revisited: Variograms and Correspondence Analysis—New Tools for the Understanding of Geochemical Data, Proc. 5th Exploration Geochemistry Symposium, Elsevier, Amsterdam, p. 163–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimroth, E., 1978, Labrador Trough Area, Geol. Rep. 193, Min. of Energy and Resources, Quebec, 396 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harff, J., and Davis, J. C., 1990, Regionalization in Geology by Multivariate Classification: Math. Geol., v. 22, p. 573–588.

    Google Scholar 

  • Journel, A. G., 1988, New Distance Measures; The Route Toward Truly Non-Gaussian Geostatistics: Math. Geol., v. 20, n. 4, p. 459–475.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebart, L., 1978, Programme d'Aggrégation avec Contraintes (C.A.H. Contiguïté): Cah. Anal. Données, v. 3, p. 275–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefkovitch, L. P., 1980, Conditional Clustering: Biometrics, v. 36, p. 43–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legendre, P., 1987, Constraint Clustering,in P. Legendre and L. Legendre (Eds.), Developments in Numerical Ecology, NATO Series, Vol. G 14: Springer-Verlag, Berlin, p. 289–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legendre, P., and Legendre, V., 1984, The Postglacial Dispersal of Freshwater Fishes in the Québec Peninsula: Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., v. 41, p. 1781–1802.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackas, D. L., 1984, Spatial Autocorrelation of Plankton Community Composition in a Continental Shelf Ecosystem: Limn. Ocean., v. 29, p. 451–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monestiez, P., 1978, Méthodes de Classification Automatique sous Contraintes Spatiales,in J. M. Legay and R. Tomassone (Eds.), Biométrie et Écologie, Société Française de Biométrie: Paris, p. 367–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morton, D. M., Baird, A. K., and Baird, K. W., 1969, The Lakeview Mountains Pluton, Southern California Batholith, II. Chemical Composition and Variation: Geol. Soc. Am., Bull., v. 80, p. 1553–1564.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, M. A., and Webster, R., 1989, A Geostatistical Basis for Spatial Weighting in Multivariate Classification: Math. Geol., v. 21, n. 1, p. 15–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray, D. M., and Berry, B. J. L., 1966, Multivariate Socioeconomic Regionalization: A Pilot Study in Central Canada,in S. Ostry and T. Rymes (Eds.), Papers on Regional Statistical Studies: University of Toronto Press, Toronto, p. 75–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sneath, P. H. A., and Sokal, R. R., 1973, Numerical Taxonomy—The Principles and Practice of Numerical Classification: W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, 573 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R. R., and Michener, C. D., 1958, A Statistical Method for Evaluating Systematic Relationships: Univ. Kansas Sci. Bull., v. 38, p. 1401–1438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, D. S., 1987, Random Vectors and Spatial Analysis by Geostatistics for Geotechnical Applications: Math. Geol., v. 19, n. 6, p. 467–479.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bourgault, G., Marcotte, D. & Legendre, P. The multivariate (co)variogram as a spatial weighting function in classification methods. Math Geol 24, 463–478 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00890530

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00890530

Key words

Navigation