Skip to main content
Log in

Separation between reference surfaces of selected vertical datums

  • Published:
Bulletin géodésique Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper discusses the separation between the reference surface of several vertical datums and the geoid. The data used includes a set of Doppler positioned stations, transformation parameters to convert the Doppler positions to ITRF90, and a potential coefficient model composed of the JGM-2 (NASA model) from degree 2 to 70 plus the OSU91A model from degree 71 to 360. The basic method of analysis is the comparison of a geometric geoid undulation derived from an ellipsoidal height and an orthometric height with the undulation computed from the potential coefficient model The mean difference can imply a bias of the datum reference surface with respect to the geoid. Vertical datums in the following countries were considered: England, Germany, United States, and Australia. The following numbers represent the bias values of each datum after adopting an equatorial radius of 6378136.3m: England (-87 cm), Germany (4 cm), United States (NGVD29 (-26 cm)), NAVD88 (-72 cm), Australia AHD (mainland, -68 cm); AHD (Tasmania, -98 cm). A negative sign indicates the datum reference surface is below the geoid. The 91 cm difference between the datums in England and Germany has been independently estimated as 80 cm. The 30 cm difference between AHD (mainland) and AHD (Tasmania) has been independently estimated as 40 cm. These bias values have been estimated from data where the geometric/ gravimetric geoid undulation difference standard deviation, at one station, is typically ±100 cm, although the mean difference is determined more accurately.

The results of this paper can be improved and expanded with more accurate geocentric station positions, more accurate and consistent heights with respect to the local vertical datum, and a more accurate gravity field for the Earth. The ideas developed here provide insight on the determination of a world height system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ashkenazi, V. et al., The Determination of Mean Sea Level Using GPS, in Sea Surface Topography and the Geoid, proc. of IAG Symposium 104, Springer-Verlag, New York, Berlin, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boucher, C. and Z. Altamimi, The IERS Terrestrial Reference System, in Proc. Sixth International Geodetic Symposium on Satellite Positioning, p. 47 – 55, DMA, 1992.

  • Heck, B. and R. Rummel, Strategies for Solving the Vertical Datum Problem Using Terrestrial and Satellite Geodetic Data, in Sea Surface Topography and the Geoid., Proc. of IAG Symposium 104, Springer-Verlag, New York, Berlin, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laskowski, P., The Effect of Vertical Datum Inconsistencies on the Determination of Gravity Related Quantities, Report No. 349, Dept. of Geodetic Science and Surveying, The Ohio State University, Columbus, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leppert, K., The Australian Levelling Adjustment, Progress to April 1970, Report on the Symposium on Coastal Geodesy, Munich, 20–24, July, p. 223, 1974.

  • Lerch, F.J. et al., Gravity Model Improvement for Topex/Poseidon, (abstract), EOS (American Geophysical Union), Vol. 74, No. 16, p. 96, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pan, M. and L. Sjoberg, Baltic Sea Level Project with GPS, Bulletin Geodesique, 67, 51–59, 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rapp, R.H. and N.K. Pavlis, The Development and Analysis of Geopotential Coefficient Models to Spherical Harmonic Degree 360, J. Geophys., 95, B13, 21,885–21,911, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapp, R.H., Y.M. Wang, N.K. Pavlis, The Ohio State 1991 Geopotential and Sea Surface Topography Harmonic Coefficient Models, Report No. 410, Dept. of Geodetic Science and Surveying, The Ohio State University, Columbus, 96 p., 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapp, R.H. and N. Balasubramania, A Conceptual Formulation of a World Height System, Report No. 421, Dept. of Geodetic Science and Surveying, The Ohio State University, Columbus, 60 p., 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapp, R.H., The Need and Prospects for a World Vertical Datum, presented at the Symposium, The Future of Terrestrial and Space Methods for Positioning, XVIII General Assembly, IUGG/IAG, Hamburg, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizos, C., R. Coleman, N. Ananga, The Bass Strait GPS Survey: Preliminary Results of an Experiment to Connect Australian Height Datums, Aust. J. Geod. Photogram. Surv., 55, 1–25, Dec. 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torge, W., Geodesy, de Gruyter, Berlin, New York, 1980.

  • Willis, P. et al., Connection of the two levelling system datum IGN69 and ODN through the Channel by using GPS and other techniques, presented at the First International Workshop on Geodesy for the Europe-Africa fixed link feasibility studies in the Strait of Gibraltar, Madrid, 8–10 March 1989.

  • Weigel, G., Geoid Undulation Computations at Doppler Satellite Tracking Stations, manuscripta geodaetica, 18: 10–15, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, P. and R. Rummel, A Quality Investigation of Global Vertical Datum Connection, Netherlands Geodetic Commission, New Series, No. 34, 1991.

  • Zilkoski, D., J. Richards, G. Young, Results of the General Adjustment of the North American Vertical Datum of 1988, Surveying and Land Information Systems, Vol. 52, No. 3, pp. 133–149, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rapp, R.H. Separation between reference surfaces of selected vertical datums. Bulletin Géodésique 69, 26–31 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00807989

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00807989

Keywords

Navigation