Abstract
Pruned triple-row hedges ofGrevillea robusta with 11 rows of maize planted in parallel on either side were grown in 12.5×16.0 m plots on a flat, freely exposed site. There were two replicates of four orientation treatments and crop yield was recorded row-by-row over 9 seasons. After the hedges had become established there were some marked differences in maize yields between sides, especially in the first rainy seasons. The maize on the downside of prevailing winds frequently showed improved growth and yield over the non-sheltered maize, sometimes by as much as 50% over the whole subplot and up to 80% in the tree/crop interface zone. These differences were significant (p≤0.05) when analyzing the whole experimental period for first and for second rainy seasons separately (prevailing winds more southerly or northerly, respectively), although they varied between seasons and zones. Attributing results to ‘shelter’ can only be adduced circumstantially because meteorological data were not collected at the plot level. Shading effect were not considered important over the whole sub-plot. Soil water profiles obtained from an array of gypsum resistance blocks in two of the plots (at 000° and 090°) characterized the wetting and drying patterns in this system, but expected asymmetries due to orientation effects were not apparent except, perhaps, fleetingly in the topsoil. At the end of the experiment the distribution of fine roots of both species was examined by means of root trenching. TheG. robusta root system extended almost symmetrically to the edges of the plot in the uncropped part, but only to some 4 m from either side of the hedge where cropped. Part of the upper profile to 1.3 m was shared with the maize roots, butGrevillea rooted further down to at least 2 m. as well as rooting deeper. The possible implications of such niche differentiation for below-ground resource capture are noted.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Argete JC and Wilson JD (1989) The microclimate in the centre of small square sheltered plots. Agric For Meteorol 48: 185–189
Baldwin CS (1988) The influence of field windbreaks on vegetable and specially crops. Agric Ecosyst Environ 22/23: 191–203
Bird PR, Bicknell D, Bulman PA, Burke SJA, Leys JF, Parker JN, Van der Sommen FJ and Voller P (1992) The role of shelter in Australia for protecting soils, plants and livestock. Agroforestry Syst 20: 59–86
Brandle JR and Hintz DL (compilers) (1986) International Symposium on Windbreak Technology, Bibliography. University of Nebraska, Dept of Forestry, Fisheries and Wildlife, Lincoln, NE, 305 pp
Brenner A (1994) Microclimatic modifications in agroforestry. In: Ong C and Huxley PA, eds, Tree Crop Interactions: A Physiological Approach. CABI/ICRAF (in press)
Corlett JE, Ong CK and Black CR (1989) Microclimatic modification in intercropping and alley-cropping systems. In: Reifsnyder WS and Darnhofer TO, eds, Meteorology and Agroforestry, pp 419–430. ICRAF, Nairobi
Darnhofer TO (1983) Notes on the microclimatic effects and design of shelter-belts. Mimeographed. ICRAF, Nairobi, 13 pp
Darnhofer TO, Gatama D, Huxley PA and Akunda E (1989) Rainfall distribution at a tree/crop interface. In: Reifsnyder WS and Darnhofer TO, eds, Meteorology and Agroforestry, pp 371–382. ICRAF, Nairobi
Davis JE and Norman JM (1988) Effects of shelter on plant water use. Agric Ecosystems Environ 22/23: 393–402
Grace J (1988) Plant response to wind. In: Brandle TR, Hintz DL and Sturrock JW, eds, Windbreak Technology, pp 71–78. Elsevier, Amsterdam
Graser EA, Verma SB and Rosenberg NJ (1987) Within canopy temperature patterns of sorghum at two row spacings. Agric For Meteorol 41: 187–205
Guyot G (1989) Les effets aerodynamiques et microclimatiques des brise-vent et des amenagements regionaux. In: Reifsnyder WS and Darnhofer TO, eds, Meteorology and Agroforestry, pp 485–520. ICRAF, Nairobi
Huxley PA (1994) Root systems of some tree species and implications for resource capture in agroforestry. In: Monteith JL, ed, Proceedings of the 52nd International Easter School on Resource capture by in Crops, 30 March–2 April, 1992. Sutton Bonington, UK (in press)
Huxley PA, Darnhofer T, Pinney A, Akunda E and Gatama D (1989a) The tree/crop Interface: a project designed to generate experimental methodology. Agrofor Abstr 2: 128–145
Huxley PA, Pinney A and Gatama D (1989b) Final Report of Development of Agroforestry Research Methodology Aimed at Simplifying the Study of Potential Tree/Crop Mixtures (Tree/Crop Interface Project). GTZ Project No 1-432-60005613). ICRAF, Nairobi, 66 pp + 5 appendices
Jackson JE and Palmer JW (1972) Interception of light by model hedgerow orchards in relation to latitude, time-of-year and hedgerow configuration and orientation. J Appl Ecol 9: 341–358
Jackson JE and Palmer JW (1989) Light availability at the tree/crop interface. In: Reifsnyder WS and Darnhofer TO, eds, Meteorology and Agroforestry, pp 391–400. ICRAF, Nairobi
Jacobs AFG (1984) Wind reduction near the surface behind a thin solid fence. Agric For Meteorol 33: 157–162
Karlen DL and Kasperbauer MJ (1989) Row orientation and configuration effects on canopy light spectra and corn growth. Appl Agric Res 4: 51–56
Kort J (1988) Benefits of windbreaks to field and forage crops. In: Brandle JR, Hintz DL and Sturrock JW, eds., Windbreak Technology, pp 165–190. Elsevier, Amsterdam
Magrath W (1979) The influence of tree shelterbelts on agricultural crop and livestock yields. Mimeographed Office Memorandum, World Bank (AGR), Washington, 35 pp
Monteith JL (1981) Coupling of plants to the atmosphere. In: Grace J, Ford ED and Jarris PG, eds, Plants and Their Atmospheric Environment, pp 1–29. Blackwell Scientific Pub., Oxford
Monteith JL, Ong CK and Corlett JE (1991) Microclimatic interactions in agroforestry systems. For Ecol Manage 45: 31–44
Mugah JO (1984) Rooting characteristics of and water extraction by Katumani Composite B maize under varying moisture conditions. East Afr Agric For J (Special Issue) 44: 80–87
Nicholas ID (1988) Plantings in tropical and sub-tropical areas. Agric Ecosyst Environ 22/23: 465–482
Pinney A and Huxley PA (in preparation) Lessons for agroforestry experimentation from a tree/crop interface project. (From a paper presented to a Regional Conference on Agroforestry Research and Development in the Miombo Ecozone of Southern Africa, 16–22 June, 1991, Lilongwe, Malawi
Quesada F Somarriba E. and Vargas E (1989) Simulation of tree shadows in agroforestry systems. In: Reifsnyder WS and Darnhofer TO, eds, Meteorology and Agroforestry, pp 157–161. ICRAF, Nairobi
Rao MR, Muraya P and Huxley PA (1993) Observations of some tree root systems grown in agroforestry intercrop situations, and their graphical presentation. Exp Agric 29: 183–194
Ripley EA (1967) Effects of shade and shelter on the microclimate of tea. East Afr Agric For J 32: 67–80
Roger J and Muraya P (1991) DATACHAIN: Database for Experimental Data, Version 2. ICRAF, Nairobi, 141 pp
Stigter CJ, Darnhofer TO and Herrera SH (1989) Crop protection from very strong winds: recommendations in a costa Rican agroforestry case study. In: Reifsnyder WS and Darnhofer TO, eds, Meteorology and Agroforestry, pp 521–529. ICRAF, Nairobi
Waister PD (1970) Effects of shelter from wind on the growth and yield of raspberries. J Hort Sci 45: 435–445
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Huxley, P.A., Pinney, A., Akunda, E. et al. A tree/crop interface orientation experiment with aGrevillea robusta hedgerow and maize. Agroforest Syst 26, 23–45 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00705150
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00705150