Skip to main content
Log in

A tree/crop interface orientation experiment with aGrevillea robusta hedgerow and maize

  • Published:
Agroforestry Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pruned triple-row hedges ofGrevillea robusta with 11 rows of maize planted in parallel on either side were grown in 12.5×16.0 m plots on a flat, freely exposed site. There were two replicates of four orientation treatments and crop yield was recorded row-by-row over 9 seasons. After the hedges had become established there were some marked differences in maize yields between sides, especially in the first rainy seasons. The maize on the downside of prevailing winds frequently showed improved growth and yield over the non-sheltered maize, sometimes by as much as 50% over the whole subplot and up to 80% in the tree/crop interface zone. These differences were significant (p≤0.05) when analyzing the whole experimental period for first and for second rainy seasons separately (prevailing winds more southerly or northerly, respectively), although they varied between seasons and zones. Attributing results to ‘shelter’ can only be adduced circumstantially because meteorological data were not collected at the plot level. Shading effect were not considered important over the whole sub-plot. Soil water profiles obtained from an array of gypsum resistance blocks in two of the plots (at 000° and 090°) characterized the wetting and drying patterns in this system, but expected asymmetries due to orientation effects were not apparent except, perhaps, fleetingly in the topsoil. At the end of the experiment the distribution of fine roots of both species was examined by means of root trenching. TheG. robusta root system extended almost symmetrically to the edges of the plot in the uncropped part, but only to some 4 m from either side of the hedge where cropped. Part of the upper profile to 1.3 m was shared with the maize roots, butGrevillea rooted further down to at least 2 m. as well as rooting deeper. The possible implications of such niche differentiation for below-ground resource capture are noted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Argete JC and Wilson JD (1989) The microclimate in the centre of small square sheltered plots. Agric For Meteorol 48: 185–189

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin CS (1988) The influence of field windbreaks on vegetable and specially crops. Agric Ecosyst Environ 22/23: 191–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Bird PR, Bicknell D, Bulman PA, Burke SJA, Leys JF, Parker JN, Van der Sommen FJ and Voller P (1992) The role of shelter in Australia for protecting soils, plants and livestock. Agroforestry Syst 20: 59–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandle JR and Hintz DL (compilers) (1986) International Symposium on Windbreak Technology, Bibliography. University of Nebraska, Dept of Forestry, Fisheries and Wildlife, Lincoln, NE, 305 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner A (1994) Microclimatic modifications in agroforestry. In: Ong C and Huxley PA, eds, Tree Crop Interactions: A Physiological Approach. CABI/ICRAF (in press)

  • Corlett JE, Ong CK and Black CR (1989) Microclimatic modification in intercropping and alley-cropping systems. In: Reifsnyder WS and Darnhofer TO, eds, Meteorology and Agroforestry, pp 419–430. ICRAF, Nairobi

    Google Scholar 

  • Darnhofer TO (1983) Notes on the microclimatic effects and design of shelter-belts. Mimeographed. ICRAF, Nairobi, 13 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Darnhofer TO, Gatama D, Huxley PA and Akunda E (1989) Rainfall distribution at a tree/crop interface. In: Reifsnyder WS and Darnhofer TO, eds, Meteorology and Agroforestry, pp 371–382. ICRAF, Nairobi

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis JE and Norman JM (1988) Effects of shelter on plant water use. Agric Ecosystems Environ 22/23: 393–402

    Google Scholar 

  • Grace J (1988) Plant response to wind. In: Brandle TR, Hintz DL and Sturrock JW, eds, Windbreak Technology, pp 71–78. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Graser EA, Verma SB and Rosenberg NJ (1987) Within canopy temperature patterns of sorghum at two row spacings. Agric For Meteorol 41: 187–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Guyot G (1989) Les effets aerodynamiques et microclimatiques des brise-vent et des amenagements regionaux. In: Reifsnyder WS and Darnhofer TO, eds, Meteorology and Agroforestry, pp 485–520. ICRAF, Nairobi

    Google Scholar 

  • Huxley PA (1994) Root systems of some tree species and implications for resource capture in agroforestry. In: Monteith JL, ed, Proceedings of the 52nd International Easter School on Resource capture by in Crops, 30 March–2 April, 1992. Sutton Bonington, UK (in press)

  • Huxley PA, Darnhofer T, Pinney A, Akunda E and Gatama D (1989a) The tree/crop Interface: a project designed to generate experimental methodology. Agrofor Abstr 2: 128–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Huxley PA, Pinney A and Gatama D (1989b) Final Report of Development of Agroforestry Research Methodology Aimed at Simplifying the Study of Potential Tree/Crop Mixtures (Tree/Crop Interface Project). GTZ Project No 1-432-60005613). ICRAF, Nairobi, 66 pp + 5 appendices

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson JE and Palmer JW (1972) Interception of light by model hedgerow orchards in relation to latitude, time-of-year and hedgerow configuration and orientation. J Appl Ecol 9: 341–358

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson JE and Palmer JW (1989) Light availability at the tree/crop interface. In: Reifsnyder WS and Darnhofer TO, eds, Meteorology and Agroforestry, pp 391–400. ICRAF, Nairobi

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs AFG (1984) Wind reduction near the surface behind a thin solid fence. Agric For Meteorol 33: 157–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Karlen DL and Kasperbauer MJ (1989) Row orientation and configuration effects on canopy light spectra and corn growth. Appl Agric Res 4: 51–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Kort J (1988) Benefits of windbreaks to field and forage crops. In: Brandle JR, Hintz DL and Sturrock JW, eds., Windbreak Technology, pp 165–190. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Magrath W (1979) The influence of tree shelterbelts on agricultural crop and livestock yields. Mimeographed Office Memorandum, World Bank (AGR), Washington, 35 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Monteith JL (1981) Coupling of plants to the atmosphere. In: Grace J, Ford ED and Jarris PG, eds, Plants and Their Atmospheric Environment, pp 1–29. Blackwell Scientific Pub., Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Monteith JL, Ong CK and Corlett JE (1991) Microclimatic interactions in agroforestry systems. For Ecol Manage 45: 31–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Mugah JO (1984) Rooting characteristics of and water extraction by Katumani Composite B maize under varying moisture conditions. East Afr Agric For J (Special Issue) 44: 80–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholas ID (1988) Plantings in tropical and sub-tropical areas. Agric Ecosyst Environ 22/23: 465–482

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinney A and Huxley PA (in preparation) Lessons for agroforestry experimentation from a tree/crop interface project. (From a paper presented to a Regional Conference on Agroforestry Research and Development in the Miombo Ecozone of Southern Africa, 16–22 June, 1991, Lilongwe, Malawi

  • Quesada F Somarriba E. and Vargas E (1989) Simulation of tree shadows in agroforestry systems. In: Reifsnyder WS and Darnhofer TO, eds, Meteorology and Agroforestry, pp 157–161. ICRAF, Nairobi

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao MR, Muraya P and Huxley PA (1993) Observations of some tree root systems grown in agroforestry intercrop situations, and their graphical presentation. Exp Agric 29: 183–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Ripley EA (1967) Effects of shade and shelter on the microclimate of tea. East Afr Agric For J 32: 67–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Roger J and Muraya P (1991) DATACHAIN: Database for Experimental Data, Version 2. ICRAF, Nairobi, 141 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigter CJ, Darnhofer TO and Herrera SH (1989) Crop protection from very strong winds: recommendations in a costa Rican agroforestry case study. In: Reifsnyder WS and Darnhofer TO, eds, Meteorology and Agroforestry, pp 521–529. ICRAF, Nairobi

    Google Scholar 

  • Waister PD (1970) Effects of shelter from wind on the growth and yield of raspberries. J Hort Sci 45: 435–445

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Huxley, P.A., Pinney, A., Akunda, E. et al. A tree/crop interface orientation experiment with aGrevillea robusta hedgerow and maize. Agroforest Syst 26, 23–45 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00705150

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00705150

Key words

Navigation