Skip to main content
Log in

Inferring from topics

Scalar Implicatures as Topic-Dependent Inferences

  • Published:
Linguistics and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Atlas, J. D.: 1990, ‘Implicature and Logical Form: The Semantics-Pragmatics Interface’, Lectures presented at the Second European Summer School in Language, Logic and Information, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven.

  • Bartsch, R.: 1976, ‘Topik-Fokus-Struktur und kategoriale Syntax’, in V. Ehrich and P. Finke (eds.),Grammatik und Pragmatik, Scriptor Verlag, Kronberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belnap, N. D. and T. B. Steel: 1976,The Logic of Questions and Answers, Yale University Press, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belnap, N. D.: 1982, ‘Questions and Answers in Montague Grammar’, in S. Peters and E. Saarinen (eds.),Processes, Beliefs, and Questions, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, R. N.: 1981, ‘Language Acquisition, Psychological Dualism and the Definition of Pragmatics’, in H. Parret, M. Sbisà, and J. Verschueren (eds.),Possibilities and Limitations of Pragmatics, John Benjamins, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carston, R.: 1985, ‘A reanalysis of Some “Quantity Implicatures”’, Unpublished ms., University College, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carston, R.: 1988, ‘Implicature, Explicature, and Truth-Theoretic Semantics’, in R. M. Kempson (ed.),Mental Representations: The Interface between Language and Reality, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fauconnier, G.: 1975a, ‘Pragmatic Scales and Logical Structure’,Linguistic Inquiry 6, 353–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fauconnier, G.: 1975b, ‘Polarity and the Scale Principle’,Papers from the 11th Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society, 188–199.

  • Fretheim, T.: 1992, ‘The Effect of Intonation on a Type of Scalar Implicature’,Journal of Pragmatics 18, 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gazdar, G.: 1979,Pragmatics: Implicature, Presupposition and Logical Form, Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grice, H. P.: 1967,Logic and Conversation, Unpublished ms. of the William James Lectures, Harvard University.

  • Grice, H. P.: 1975, ‘Logic and Conversation’, in P. Cole and J. L. Morgan (eds.),Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groenendijk, J. A. G. and M. J. B. Stokhof: 1984, ‘On the Semantics of Questions and the Pragmatics of Answers’,Studies on the Semantics of Questions and the Pragmatics of Answers, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Amsterdam, pp. 209–250.

  • Grosz, B. J. and C. L. Sidner: 1986, ‘Attention, Intentions, and the Structure of Discourse’,Computational Linguistics 12, 175–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosz, B.: 1978, ‘Discourse Knowledge’, in D. E. Walker (ed.),Understanding Spoken Language, Elsevier North-Holland, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamblin, C. L..: 1973, ‘Questions in Montague English’,Foundations of Language 10, 41–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harnish, R. M.: 1979, ‘Logical Form and Implicature’, in K. Bach and R. M. Harnish (eds.),Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts, MIT Press, Cambridge (Mass.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausser, R. R.: 1983, ‘Surface Compositionality and the Semantics of Mood’, in J. R. Searle, F. Kiefer, and M. Bierwisch (eds.),Speech Act Theory and Pragmatics, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschberg, J.: 1985,A Theory of Scalar Implicature, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Pennsylvania. (Published in the Outstanding Dissertations in Linguistics series, Garland Publishers, New York, 1991).

  • Horn, L. R.: 1972,On the Semantic Properties of Logical Operators in English, Ph.D. Thesis, University of California at Los Angeles.

  • Horn, L. R.: 1989,A Natural History of Negation, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, L. R.: 1992, ‘The Said and the Unsaid’, in C. Barker and D. Dowry (eds.),Proceedings of SALT II. Ohio State University.

  • Karttunen, L.: 1977, ‘Syntax and Semantics of Questions’,Linguistics and Philosophy 1, 344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kempson, R.: 1986, ‘Ambiguity and the Semantics-Pragmatics Distinction’, in C. Travis (ed.),Meaning and Interpretation, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, W. and C. von Stutterheim: 1987, ‘Quaestio und referentielle Bewegung in Erzählungen’,Linguistische Berichte 109, 163–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroch, A.: 1972, ‘Lexical and Inferred Meanings for Some Time Adverbs’,Quarterly Progress Report of the Research Lab. of Electronics, MIT, 104.

  • Levinson, S.C.: 1983,Pragmatics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, W. C. and S. A. Thompson: 1988, ‘Rhetorical Structure Theory: Toward a Functional Theory of Text Organization’,Text 8, 243–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moser, M. and J. Moore: 1993, ‘Investigating Discourse Relations’, in O. Rambow (ed.),Intentionality and Structure in Discourse Relations, Proceedings of the ACL SIG Workshop, Columbus (Ohio).

  • Partee, B. H., A. ter Meulen, and R. F. Wall: 1990,Mathematical Methods in Linguistics, Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichman, R.: 1978, ‘Conversational Coherency’,Cognitive Science 2.

  • Rooth, M.: 1992, ‘A Theory of Focus Interpretation’,Natural Language Semantics 1, 75–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadock, J. M.: 1978, ‘On Testing for Conversational Implicature’, in P. Cole (ed.),Syntax and Semantics 9: Pragmatics.

  • Sadock, J. M.: 1984, ‘Whither Radical Pragmatics?’, in D. Schiffrin (ed.),Meaning, Form, and Use in Context: Linguistic Applications, Georgetown University Press, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scha, R. J. H.: 1983,Logical Foundations of Question Answering, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Groningen.

  • Scharten, R.: forthcoming,A Discourse-Semantic Account of Gricean Implicatures, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Nijmegen.

  • Seuren, P. A. M.: 1993, ‘Why Does 2 Mean “2”? — Grist to the Anti-Grice Mill’, in E. Hajičová (ed.),Functional Description of Language, Charles University, Prague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperber, D. and D. Wilson: 1986,Relevance. Communication and Cognition, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stout, G. F.: 1896,Analytic Psychology, Allen and Unwin, London/Macmillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tichý, P.: 1978, ‘Questions, Answers and Logic’,American Philosophical Quarterly 15, 275–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Kuppevelt, J.: 1991,Topic en Comment: Expliciete en Impliciete Vraagstelling in Discourse, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Nijmegen.

  • Van Kuppevelt, J.: 1993, ‘About a Uniform Conception of S- and D-Topics’, in E. Hajiçová (ed.),Functional Description of Language, Charles University, Prague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Kuppevelt, J.: 1993, ‘Topic and Comment’, in R. E. Asher (ed.),The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, Pergamon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Kuppevelt, J.: 1994, ‘Directionality in Discourse’, in P. Bosch and R. van der Sandt (eds.),Proceedings of the Interdisciplinary Conference on Focus and Natural Language Processing, Heidelberg: IBM Working Papers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Kuppevelt, J.: 1995a, ‘Discourse Structure, Topicality and Questioning’,Journal of Linguistics 31, 109–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Kuppevelt, J.: 1995b, ‘Main Structure and Side Structure in Discourse’,Linguistics 33, 809–833.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Kuppevelt, J.: forthcoming, ‘Un(der)determinedness and Questioning in Discourse’.

  • Vennemann, T.: 1975, ‘Topics, Sentence Accent, Ellipsis: A Proposal for their Formal Treatment’, in E. L. Keenan (ed.),Formal Semantics of Natural Language, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Van Kuppevelt, J. Inferring from topics. Linguist Philos 19, 393–443 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00630897

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00630897

Keywords

Navigation