Skip to main content
Log in

Statistical analysis of bioavailability studies: Parametric and nonparametric confidence intervals

  • Originals
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

For a two-way cross-over design, which appears to be the most common experimental design in bioavailability studies, 95%-confidence limits for expected bioavailability can be obtained by classical analysis of variance (ANOVA). If symmetry of the confidence interval is desired about zero (differences) or unity (ratios) rather than about the corresponding point estimator, Westlake's modification can be used. Two nonparametric methods and their adaptations to bioavailability ratios are reviewed, one based on Wilcoxon's signed rank test (Tukey), and the other on Pitman's permutation test. The necessary assumptions and the merits of these procedures are discussed. The methods are illustrated by an example of a comparative bioavailability study. A FORTRAN program facilitating the procedures is available from the authors upon request.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abt K (1977) Cross-over Versuchspläne: Grenzen der Anwendung und der parametrischen Auswertung. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Austro-Swiss Region of the International Biometric Society, Krems/Austria, September 1977

  • Anttila M, Kahela P, Panelius M, Yrjänä T, Tikkanen R, Aaltonen R (1979) Comparative bioavailability of two commercial preparations of carbamazepine tablets. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 15: 421–425

    Google Scholar 

  • Armitage P (1981) Bioequivalence testing — a need to rethink: note by editor. Biometrics 37: 593–594

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochran WG, Cox GM (1957) Experimental design; 2nd ed. Wiley, New York, pp 117–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Fluehler H, Hirtz J, Moser HA (1981) An aid to decision-making in bioequivalence assessment. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm 9: 235–243

    Google Scholar 

  • Geigy Wissenschaftliche Tabellen (1980), Vol. 3; 8th ed. Thieme, Stuttgart, p 163

  • Grieve AP (1982) The two-period changeover design in clinical trials. Biometrics 38: 517

    Google Scholar 

  • Grizzle JE (1965) The two-period change-over design and its use in clinical trials. Biometrics 21: 467–480. Correction note (1974) Biometrics 30: 727

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollander M, Wolfe DA (1973) Nonparametric statistical methods. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkwood TBL (1981) Bioequivalence testing — a need to rethink. Biometrics 37: 589–591

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch GG (1972) The use of non-parametric methods in the statistical analysis of the two-period change-over design. Biometrics 28: 577–584

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer WG, Kolibash AJ, Bathala MS, Visconti JA, Lewis RP, Reuning RH (1977) Digoxin bioavailability: evaluation of a generic tablet and proposed FDA guidelines. J Pharm Sci 66: 1720–1722

    Google Scholar 

  • Loo JCK, Riegelman S (1968) New method for calculating the intrinsic absorption rate of drugs. J Pharm Sci 57:918–928

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandallaz D, Mau J (1981) Comparison of different methods for decision-making in bioequivalence assessment. Biometrics 37: 213–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Mantel N (1977) Do we want confidence intervals symmetrical about the null value? Biometrics 33: 759–760

    Google Scholar 

  • Mau J (1981) Die Verwendung von Fiduzialwahrscheinlichkeiten zur Beurteilung der Bioäquivalenz. To be published in the Proceedings of the 27th meeting of the German region of the International Biometric Society, Bad Nauheim, March 1981

  • Metzler CM (1974) Bioavailability — a problem in equivalence. Biometrics 30: 309–317

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostle B (1966) Statistics in research. Iowa State University Press, Iowa

    Google Scholar 

  • Rietbrock N, Alken RG, Ebert W (1979) Vergleichende Untersuchung der absoluten Bioverfügbarkeit von vier oralen Digoxin-Präparaten. Arzneim Forsch (Drug Res) 29: 1742–1745

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodda BE, Davis RL (1980) Determining the probability of an important difference in bioavailability. Clin Pharmacol Ther 28: 247–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Royen T (1978) Randomisierungstests zum Vergleich verbundener Stichproben. EDV in Medizin und Biologie 9: 104–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Selwyn MR, Dempster AP, Hall NR (1981) A Bayesian approach to bioequivalence for the 2 × 2 changeover design. Biometrics 37: 11–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Shirley E (1976) The use of confidence intervals in biopharmaceutics. J Pharm Pharmacol 28: 312–313

    Google Scholar 

  • Shirley EAC, Unwin PF (1978) The analysis of data from comparative bioavailability studies. Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet 3: 165–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Spriet A, Beiler D (1978) Table to facilitate determination of symmetrical confidence intervals in bioavailability trials with Westlake's method. Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet 3: 129–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinijans VW (1981) Verteilungsfreier Punktschätzer und Vertrauensgrenzen für Bioverfügbarkeitsquotienten. To be published in the Proceedings of the 27th meeting of the German Region of the International Biometric Society, Bad Nauheim, March 1981

  • Steinijans VW, Eicke R, Ahrens J (1982) Pharmacokinetics of theophylline in patients following short-term intravenous infusion. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 22: 417–422

    Google Scholar 

  • Upton RA, Sansom L, Guentert TW, Powell JR, Thiercelin JF, Shah VP, Coates PE, Riegelman S (1980) Evaluation of the absorption from 15 commercial theophylline products indicating deficiencies in currently applied bioavailability criteria. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm 8: 229–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Vila JL, Martinez R, Giménez J, Llabrés M (1980) MANOVA of statistical moments in biopharmaceutical studies: a numerical example with three equally spaced doses of amoxicillin. J Pharmakokinet Biopharm 8: 411–420

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner JG, Nelson E (1963) Per cent absorbed time plots derived from blood level and/or urinary excretion data. J Pharm Sci 52: 610–611

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallenstein S, Fisher AC (1977) The analysis of the two-period repeated measurements crossover design with applications to clinical trials. Biometrics 33: 261–269

    Google Scholar 

  • Westlake WJ (1972) Use of confidence intervals in analysis of comparative bioavailability trials. J Pharm Sci 61: 1340–1341

    Google Scholar 

  • Westlake WJ (1973) Use of statistical methods in evaluation of in vivo performance of dosage forms. J Pharm Sci 62: 1579–1589

    Google Scholar 

  • Westlake WJ (1974) The use of balanced incomplete block designs in comparative bioavailability trials. Biometrics 30: 319–327

    Google Scholar 

  • Westlake WJ (1976) Symmetrical confidence intervals for bioequivalence trials. Biometrics 32: 741–744

    Google Scholar 

  • Westlake WJ (1979) Statistical aspects of comparative bioavailability trials. Biometrics 35: 273–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Westlake WJ (1981) Bioequivalence testing — a need to rethink: response. Biometrics 37: 591–593

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcoxon F, Katti SK, Wilcox RA (1973) Probability levels for the Wilcoxon signed rank test. In: Harter HL, Owen DB (eds) Selected Tables in Mathematical Statistics, Vol.I. American Mathematical Society, Providence, Rhode Island

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeh KC, Kwan KC (1978) A comparison of numerical integrating algorithms by trapezoidal, Lagrange, and spline approximation. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm 6: 79–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Zech K, Borner K, v. Stetten O (1980) Monitoring of serum or saliva theophylline concentrations by a new radioimmunoassay. Anal Chem 301: 114

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Steinijans, V.W., Diletti, E. Statistical analysis of bioavailability studies: Parametric and nonparametric confidence intervals. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 24, 127–136 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00613939

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00613939

Key words

Navigation