Abstract
The main aim of our study was to find out the effect of several lexical and sublexical variables (lexical category, lexical frequency, syllabic structure, and word length) in the acquisition of reading in a transparent language such as Spanish. The second goal of our study was the comparison of the effect of these variables in normal and poor Spanish readers. One hundred and forty children (aged between 6 and 12), twenty of whom were poor readers, were tested using a reading test of 306 items in which we balanced all the variables. The dependent variable was the percentage of correct responses in a decontextualized word reading test. Our results showed that all the above mentioned variables produced a significant effect on the number of errors made by the children. This pattern of results suggests no difference between the processes involved in the reading acquisition of Spanish and those implicated in deep orthographies such as English. Our results also showed no qualitative differences between normal and poor readers. The four variables studied showed the same behaviour in their effect on reading performance for both normal and poor readers, indicating that poor readers also use both the lexical and the phonological route. Our data suggest the universality of the dual route model, independent of the transparency or opaqueness of the different alphabetical languages.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alvarez, C., Carreiras, M. & De Vega, M. (1992). Estudio estadístico de la ortografía castellana, 1: La frecuencia silábica [A cognitive study of Spanish orthography, 1: Syllabic frequency],Cognitiva 4: 75–105.
Coltheart, M. (1978). Lexical access in simple reading tasks. In: G. Underwood (ed.),Strategies of information processing (pp. 151–216). London: Academic Press.
Coltheart, M. (1985). In defense of dual-route models of reading,The Behavioral & Brain Sciences 8: 709–710.
Defior, S., Justicia, F. & Martos, F. (1994). The influence of lexical frequency, syllabic structure and word length in the development of reading skills in Spanish.Proceedings of the XIIIth Biennial Meetings of ISSBD. Amsterdam (The Netherlands), p. 317.
De Vega, M., Carreiras, M., Gutierrez-Calvo, M. & Alonso-Quecuty, M. (1990).Lectura y comprensión: Una perspectiva cognitiva [Reading and comprehension: A cognitive approach]. Madrid: Alianza.
Ellis, A. W. & Young, A. W. (1988).Human cognitive neuropsychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Ellis, A. W., Miller, D. & Sin, G. (1983). Wernicke's aphasia and normal language processing: A case study in cognitive neuropsychology,cognition 15: 111–144.
Feldman, L. B. & Turvey, M. T. (1983). Word recognition in Serbocroatian is phonologically analytic,Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 9: 288–298.
Frost, R., Katz, L. & Bentin, S. (1987). Strategies for visual word recognition and orthographic depth: A multilingual comparison,Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 13: 104–115.
García-Albea, J. E., Sanchez-Casas, R. & del Viso, S. (1982). Efecto de la frecuencia de uso en el reconocimiento de palabras [Frequency effects in word recognition].Investigaciones Psicológicas [Psychological Researches] 1: 24–63.
Habertlandt, K. T. & Graesser, A. C. (1985). Component processes in text comprehension and some of their interactions,Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 114: 357–374.
Hudson, P. & Bergman, M. W. (1985). Lexical knowledge in word recognition: Word length and word frequency in naming and lexical decision tasks,Memory & Language 24: 46–58.
Just, M. & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension,Psychological Review 87: 329–354.
Justicia, F. (1994).El desarrollo del vocabulario. Diccionario de frecuencias [Vocabulary development. Dictionary of frequencies], Granada. Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Granada [Granada University Press].
Oden, G. C. (1984). Dependence, independence, and emergence of word features,Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 10: 394–405.
Patterson, K. & Coltheart, M. (1987). Phonological processes in reading: A tutorial review. In: M. Coltheart (ed.),Attention and performance, XII:The psychology of reading (pp. 421–447). London: Erlbaum.
Segui, J., Frauenfelder, U. H., Laine, C. & Mehler, J. (1987). The word frequency effect for open- and closed-class items,Cognitive Neuropsychology 4: 33–44.
Seidenberg, M. S. (1985). Explanatory adequacy and models of word recognition,The Behavioral & Brain Sciences 8: 724–726.
Siegel, L. S. (1992). An evaluation of the discrepancy definition of dyslexia,Journal of Learning Disabilities 25: 618–629.
Stanovich, K. E. (1988). Explaining the differences between the dyslexic and garden variety poor reader: The phonological-core variance-difference model,Journal of Learning Disabilities 21: 590–612.
Snowling, M. J. (1980). The development of grapheme-phoneme correspondence in normal and dyslexic readers,Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 29: 294–305.
Valle-Arroyo, F. (1989). Errores en lectura y escritura. Un modelo dual [Reading and writing errors: A dual model],Cognitiva 2: 35–63.
Valle-Arroyo, F. (1990). Spelling errors in Spanish,Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal 1: 83–99.
Valle-Arroyo, F. & Cuetos, F. (1988). La dislexia desde el enfoque neurocognitivo [Neurocognitive approaches to dyslexia],Revista de Neurología de Sant Paul [Neurological Journal of Saint Paul] 10: 9–19.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Defior, S., Justicia, F. & Martos, F.J. The influence of lexical and sublexical variables in normal and poor Spanish readers. Read Writ 8, 487–497 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00577024
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00577024