Abstract
Based on principles of constructivism, an analysis is made of how practice in mathematical education might be reformed towards a professional practice. In addition to the widespread recommendations that mathematical teaching be based on interactive communication and that mathematical learning be active, we argue that conventional school mathematics be replaced by a constructivist school mathematics. A constructivist school mathematics is based on children's use of their schemes of action and operation in learning situations, and whatever accommodation the children make in these schemes as they use them. Through examples of our learning of the numerical schemes of five year old children we illustrate what we mean by a constructivist school mathematics. In our examples, we characterize the schemes of action and operation that we attribute to children as our interpretations of the children's activities. For this reason, we define a constructivist school mathematics to be the results of the observer's experiential abstractions in the context of interacting with children mathematically. A professional teacher is cast as one with the intellectual autonomy and power to produce a constructivist school mathematics, including the involved situations of learning and interactive mathematical communication.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bauersfeld, H.: in press, “The structure of the structures: Development and function of mathematizing as a social practice”. In L. P., Steffe (ed.),Constructivism in Education, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
Beilin, H.: 1971, “The training and acquisition of logical operations”. In M. F. Rosskopf, L. P. Steffe, and S. Taback (eds.),Piagetian Cognitive-Development Research and Mathematical Education, National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Reston, VA, pp. 81–124.
Brownell, W. A.: 1928,The Development of Children's Number Ideas in the Primary Grades, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Cobb, P., Wood, T., and Yackel, E.: 1990, “Classrooms as learning environments for teachers and researchers”. In R. B. Davis, C. A. Maher, and N. Noddings (eds.),Constructivist Views on the Teaching and Learning of Mathematics, National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Reston, VA, pp. 125–146.
Cooney, T. J.: 1988, “The issue of reform: What have we learned from yesteryear?”,Mathematics Teacher 81(5), 352–363.
Davydov, V. V.: 1982, “The psychological characteristics of the formation of elementary mathematical operations in children”. In T. P. Carpenter, J. M. Moser, and T. A. Romberg (eds.),Addition and Subtraction: A Cognitive Perspective, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 224–238.
Davis, R. B.: 1966, “Discovery in the teaching of mathematics”. In L. S. Shulman and E. R. Keislar (eds.),Learning by Discovery: A Critical Appraisal, Rand McNally, Chicago, pp. 115–128.
Davis, P. J. and Hersh, R.: 1981,The Mathematical Experience, Birkhäuser, Boston.
Davis, R. B., Maher, C. A., and Noddings, N., (eds.): 1990,Contructivist Views on the Teaching and Learning of Mathematics, National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Reston, VA.
Ernest, P.: 1991a,Constructivism, the Psychology of Learning, and the Nature of Mathematics: Some Critical Issues. Unpublished manuscript.
Ernest, P.: 1991b,The Philosophy of Mathematics Education, Falmer Press, London.
Hausdorff, F.: 1962,Set Theory, Chelsea, New York.
Hendrix, G.: 1961, “Learning by discovery”,Mathematics Teacher 54, 290–299.
Hoffman, P.: 1987, “The man who loves only numbers”,The Atlantic Monthly, November, 60–74.
Kamii, C. and DeClark, G.: 1985,Young Children Reinvent Arithmetic: Implications of Piaget's Theory, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York.
Kamii, C. and DeVries, R.: 1980,Group Games in Early Education: Implications of Piaget's Theory, The National Association for the Education of Young Children, Washington, DC.
Kamii, C. and Joseph, L. L.: 1989,Young Children Continue to Reinvent Arithmetic, 2nd grade: Implications of Piaget's Theory, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York.
Kilpatrick, J.: 1964, “Cognitive theory and the SMSG program”. In R. E. Ripple and V. N. Rockcastle (eds.),Piaget Rediscovered. A Report of the Conference on Cognitive Studies and Curriculum Development, School of Education, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics: 1989,Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics, Author, Reston, VA.
National Research Council: 1989,Everybody Counts. A Report to the Nation on the Future of Mathematics Education, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
Noddings, N.: 1990, “Constructivism in mathematics education”. In R. B. Davis, C. A. Maher, and N. Noddings (eds.),Constructivist Views on the Teaching and Learning of Mathematics, National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Reston, VA, pp. 7–18.
Piaget, J.: 1980, “Schemes of action and language learning”. In M. Piattelli-Palmarini (ed.),Language and Learning: The Debate between Jean Piaget and Noam Chomsky, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 164–167.
Piaget, J. and Szeminska, A.: 1952,The Child's Conception of Number, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
Rathrnell, E. C.: 1978, “Using thinking strategies to teach the basic facts”. In National Council of Teachers of Mathematics,Developing Computational Skills (1978 Yearbook), National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Reston, VA, pp. 13–38.
Steffe, L. P.: 1991, “The learning paradox: A plausible counterexample”. In L. P. Steffe (ed.),Epistemological Foundations of Mathematical Experience, Springer-Verlag, New York.
Steffe, L. P. and Cobb, P. (with E. von Glasersfeld): 1988,Construction of Arithmetical Meanings and Strategies, New York: Springer-Verlag.
Steffe, L. P. and Wood, T. (eds.): 1990,Transforming Children's Mathematics Education: International Perspectives, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
Steffe, L. P., von Glasersfeld, E., Richards, J., and Cobb, P.: 1983,Children's Counting Types: Philosophy, Theory, and Application, Praeger, New York.
Voigt, J.: 1989, “The social constitution of the mathematical province: A micro ethnographical study in the classroom”,The Quarterly Newsletter of the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition 11(1/2), 27–34.
von Foerster, H.: 1984, “On constructing reality”. In P. Watzlawick (ed.),The Invented Reality: How Do We Know What We Believe We Know?, W. W. Norton, London, pp. 41–61.
von Glasersfeld, E.: 1989, “Environment and communication”. In L. P. Steffe and T. Wood (eds.),Transforming Early Childhood Mathematics Education, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 30–38.
von Glasersfeld, E.: 1991a, “Abstraction, re-presentation, and reflection: An interpretation of experience and Piaget's approach”. In L. P. Steffe (ed.),Epistemological Foundations of Mathematical Experience, Springer-Verlag, New York.
von Glasersfeld, E., (ed.): 1991b,Radical Constructivism in Mathematics Education, Kluwer, Dordrecht.
Wertheimer, M.: 1959,Productive Thinking, Harper and Row, New York.
Wood, T., Cobb, P., and Yackel, E.: in press, “Reflections on Learning and Teaching Mathematics in Elementary School”. In L. P. Steffe (ed.),Constructivism in Education, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
Wright, R. J.: 1989,Numerical Development in the Kindergarten Year: A Teaching Experiment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Steffe, L.P., Wiegel, H.G. On reforming practice in mathematics education. Educ Stud Math 23, 445–465 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00571467
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00571467