Skip to main content
Log in

Hydraulic radius and mesh size of gels

  • Published:
Journal of Sol-Gel Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For materials with high porosity, the hydraulic radius (r h ) is not proportional to the characteristic dimension of the pore space. Techniques (e.g., NMR) that measure r h will give much larger “pore sizes” than techniques (e.g., thermoporometry) that measure pore entry radii. In this note, estimates of the relation between hydraulic radius and pore size of gel networks are obtained from cell models. The “constant” in the Kozeny equation, which relates permeability to r h , is strongly density-dependent at low densities. For gels it is suggested that the permeability is more directly related to the mesh size of the network than to the hydraulic radius. The mesh size is also critical for immobilization of dyes or enzymes in a gel, and r h is a misleading measure of the ability of a network to entrap a large molecule.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. S. Gits-Leon, F. LeFaucheux, and M.C. Robert, J. Crystal Growth, 84, 155 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  2. S. Wu, L.M. Ellerby, J.S. Cohan, B. Dunn, M.A. El-Sayed, J. Selverstone Valentine, and J.I. Zink, Chem. Mater. 5, 115 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  3. S. Braun, S. Shtelzer, S. Rappoport, D. Avnir, and M. Ottolenghi, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 147&148, 739 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  4. G.W. Scherer and R.M. Swiatek, J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 113, 119 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  5. G.W. Scherer, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 73 [1], 3 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  6. C.J. Brinker and G.W. Scherer, Sol-Gel Science (Academic Press, New York, 1990) Ch. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  7. G.W. Scherer, J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 142 [1–2], 18 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  8. G.W. Scherer, H. Hdach, and J. Phalippou, J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 130, 157 (1991); correction 136, 269 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  9. G.W. Scherer, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 145, 33 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  10. J.D.F. Ramsay and B.O. Booth, J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 1 79, 173 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  11. D.P. Gallegos, K. Munn, D.M. Smith, and D.L. Stermer, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 119 [1], 127 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  12. M. Brun, A. Lallemand, J.F. Quinson, and C. Eyraud, Thermochimica Acta, 21, 59 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  13. A.E. Scheidegger, The physics of flow through porous media, 3d ed. (Univ. Toronto Press, Toronto, Canada, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  14. J. Happel and H. Brenner, Low Reynolds Number Hydrodynamics (Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht, 1986), pp. 392–396.

    Google Scholar 

  15. A.J. Katz and A.H. Thompson, Phys. Rev. B 34 [11], 8179 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  16. J.S. Reed, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 76 [2], 547 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  17. G.P. Johnston, D.M. Smith, I. Melendez, and A.J. Hurd, Powder Technology 61, 289 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  18. G.W. Scherer, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 155, 1 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  19. J.F. Quinson, M. Repellin Lacroix, M. Pauthe, A. Roche, and G.W. Scherer, “Structure and Permeability of Gels,” accepted for publication in J. Sol-Gel Science and Technology.

  20. G.W. Scherer, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 74 [7], 1523 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  21. C.J. Brinker and G.W. Scherer, Sol-Gel Science (Academic Press, NY, 1990), Ch. 11.

    Google Scholar 

  22. C.J. Brinker, K.D. Keefer, D.W. Schaefer, R.A. Assink, B.D. Kay, and C.S. Ashley, J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 63, 45 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  23. G.W. Scherer, J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 109, 183 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Scherer, G.W. Hydraulic radius and mesh size of gels. J Sol-Gel Sci Technol 1, 285–291 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00486171

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00486171

Key words

Navigation