Skip to main content
Log in

The capacity of hydrogenotrophic anaerobic bacteria to compete for traces of hydrogen depends on the redox potential of the terminal electron acceptor

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Archives of Microbiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effect of different electron acceptors on substrate degradation was studied in pure and mixed cultures of various hydrogenotrophic homoacetogenic, methanogenic, sulfate-reducing, fumarate-reducing and nitrate-ammonifying bacteria. Two different species of these bacteria which during organic substrate degradation produce and consume hydrogen, were cocultured on a substrate which was utilized only by one of them. Hydrogen, which was excreted as intermediate by the first strain (and reoxidized in pure culture), could, depending on the hydrogen acceptor present, also be used by the second organism, resulting in interspecies hydrogen transfer. The efficiency of H2 transfer was similar when methanol, lactate or fructose were used as organic substrate, although the free energy changes of fermentative H2 formation of these substrates are considerably different. In coculture experiments nitrate or fumarate>sulfate> CO2/CH4>sulfur or CO2/acetate were the preferred electron acceptors, and an increasing percentage of H2 was transferred to that bacterium which was able to utilize the preferred electron acceptor. In pure culture the threshold values for hydrogen oxidation decreased in the same order from ≤1,100 ppm for homoacetogenic bacteria to about 0.03 ppm for nitrate or fumarate reducing bacteria. The determined H2-threshold values as well as the percentage of H2 transfer in cocultures were related to the Gibbs free energy change of the respective hydrogen oxidizing reaction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abram JW, Nedwell DB (1978a) Inhibition of methanogenesis by sulfate reducing bacteria competing for transferred hydrogen. Arch Microbiol 117:89–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Abram JW, Nedwell DB (1978b) Hydrogen as a substrate for methanogenesis and sulfate reduction in anaerobic saltmarsh sediment Arch Microbiol 117:93–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer DB, Powell GE (1985) Dependence of the specific growth rate of methanogenic mutualistic cocultures on the methanogen. Arch Microbiol 141:133–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Bache R, Pfennig N (1981) Selective isolation Acetobacterium woodi on methoxylated aromatic acids and determination of growth yields. Arch Microbiol 130:255–261

    Google Scholar 

  • Bokranz M, Katz J, Schröder J, Roberton AM, Kröger A (1983) Energy metabolism and biosynthesis of Vibrio succinogenes growing with nitrate or nitrite as terminal electron acceptors. Arch Microbiol 135:36–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Boone DR, Bryant MP (1980) Propionate-degrading bacterium, Syntrophobacter wolinii sp. nov. gen. nov., from methanogenic ecosystems. Appl Environ Microbiol 40:626–632

    Google Scholar 

  • Boone DR, Menaia JAGF, Mah RA (1987) Effects of hydrogen pressure during growth and effects of pregrowth with hydrogen on acetate degradation by Methanosarcina species. Appl Environ Microbiol 53:83–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant MP, (1979) Microbial methane production-theoretical aspects. J Anim Sci 48:193–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Conrad R, Phelps TJ, Zeikus JG (1985) Gas metabolism evidence in support of the juxtaposition of hydrogen-producing and methanogenic bacteria in sewage sludge and lake sediments. Appl Environ Microbiol 50:595–601

    Google Scholar 

  • Conrad R, Schink B, Phelps TJ (1986) Thermodynamics of H2-consuming and H2-producing metabolic reactions in diverse methanogenic environments under in situ conditions. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 38:353–360

    Google Scholar 

  • Cord-Ruwisch R (1985) A quick method for the determination of dissolved and precipitated sulfides in cultures of sulfate-reducing bacteria. J Microbiol Meth 4:33–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Cord-Ruwisch R (1986) Facultative and partial interspecies hydrogen transfer-competition for reducing equivalents. In: Dubourguier HC, Albagnac G, Montreuil J, Romond C, Sautiere P, Guillaume J (eds) Biology of anaerobic bacteria. Elsevier, Amsterdam pp 16–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Cord-Ruwisch R, Ollivier B (1986) Interspecific hydrogen transfer during methanol degradation between Sporomusa acidovorans and hydrogenophilic anaerobes. Arch Microbiol 144:163–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Cord-Ruwisch R, Ollivier B, Garcia J-L (1986) Fructose degradation by Desulfovibrio sp. in pure culture and in coculture with Methanospirillum hungatei. Curr Microbiol 13:285–289

    Google Scholar 

  • Gribić-Galić D (1985) Fermentative and oxidative transformation of ferulate by fermentatively anaerobic bacteria isolated from sewage sludge. Appl Environ Microbiol 50:1052–1057

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatchikian EC, Chaigneau M, LeGall J (1976) Analysis of gas production by growing cultures of three species of sulfate-reducing bacteria. In: Schlegel HG, Gottschalk G, Pfennig N (eds) Microbial production and utilization of gases. Goltze, Göttingen, pp 109–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Heijthuijsen JHFG, Hansen TA (1986) Interspecies hydrogen transfer in co-cultures of methanol utilizing acidogens and sulfate-reducing or methanogenic bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 38:57–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Hukelikian H (1943) Effects of the addition of sodium nitrate on sewage hydrogen sulfide production and BOD Reduction. Sewage Works J 15:255–259

    Google Scholar 

  • Hungate RE (1967) Hydrogen as an intermediate in the rumen fermentation. Arch Mikrobiol 59:158–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenneman GE, McInerney, Knapp, RM (1986) Effect of nitrate on biogenic sulfide production. Appl Environ Microbiol 51: 1205–1211

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristiansson JK, Schönheit P, Thauer RK (1982) Different K s values for hydrogen of methanogenic bacteria and sulfate reducing bacteria: an explanation for the apparent inhibition of methanogenesis by sulfate. Arch Microbiol 131:278–282

    Google Scholar 

  • Krzycki JA, Morgan JB, Conrad R, Zeikus JG (1987) Hydrogen metabolism during methanogenesis from acetate by Methanosarcina barkeri. FEMS Microbiol Lett 40:1193–1198

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovley DR (1985) Minimum threshold for hydrogen metabolism in methanogenic bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 49:1530–1531

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovley DR, Ferry JG (1984) Production and consumption of H2 during growth of Methanosarcina spp. on acetate. Appl Environ Microbiol 49:247–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovley DR, Klug MJ (1983) Sulfate reducers can outcompete methanogens at freshwater sulfate concentrations. Appl Environ Microbiol 45:187–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovley DR, Dwyer DF, Klug MJ (1982) Kinetic analysis of competition between sulfate reducers and methanogens for hydrogen in sediments. Appl Environ Microbiol 43:1373–1379

    Google Scholar 

  • Lupton FS, Zeikus JG (1984) Physiological basis for sulfate-dependent hydrogen competition between sulfidogens and methanogens. Curr Microbiol 11:7–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Lupton FS, Conrad R, Zeikus JG (1984) Physiological function of hydrogen metabolism during growth of sulfidogenic substrates. J Bacteriol 1959:843–849

    Google Scholar 

  • Mah RA (1982) Methanogenesis and methanogenic partnerships. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 297:599–616

    Google Scholar 

  • McInerney MJ, Bryant MP (1980) Review of methane fermentation fundamentals. In: Wise DL (ed) Fuel gas production from biomass. Chemical Rubber Co. Press, West Palm Beach, pp 20–46

    Google Scholar 

  • McInerney MJ, Bryant MP, Hespell RB, Costerton JW (1981) Synthrophomonas wolfei gen. nov. sp. nov., an anaerobic synthrophic, fatty acid oxidizing bacterium. Appl Environ Microbiol 41:1029–1039

    Google Scholar 

  • Mountfort DO, Bryant MP (1982) Isolation and characterization of an anaerobic syntrophic benzoate degrading bacterium from sewage sludge. Arch Microbiol 133:249–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Novelli PC, Scranton MI, Michener RH (1987) Hydrogen distributions in marine sediments. Limnol Oceanogr 32:565–576

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Brien JM, Wolkin RH, Moench TT, Morgan JB, Zeikus JG (1984) Association of hydrogen metabolism with unitrophic or mixotrophic growth of Methanosarcina barkeri on carbon monoxide. J Bacteriol 158:373–375

    Google Scholar 

  • Phelps TJ, Conrad R, Zeikus JG (1985) Sulfate-dependent interspecies H2 transfer between Methanosarcina barkeri and Desulfovibrio vulgaris during coculture metabolism of acetate or methanol. Appl Environ Microbiol 50:589–594

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell GE (1984) Equalisation of specific growth rates for syntrophic associations in batch culture. J Chem Tech Biotechnol 34B:97–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell GE (1985) Stable coexistence of syntrophic associations in continuous culture. J Chem Tech Biotechnol 35B:46–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson JA, Tiedje JM (1984) Competition between sulfate-reducing and methanogenic bacteria for H2 under resting and growing conditions. Arch Microbiol 137:26–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson JA, Strayer RF, Tiedje JM (1981) Method for measuring dissolved hydrogen in anaerobic ecosystems: applications to the rumen. Appl Environ Microbiol 41:545–548

    Google Scholar 

  • Schink B (1987) Principles and limits of anaerobic degradation: environmental and technological aspects. In: Zehnder AJB (ed) Environmental microbiology of anaerobes. Wiley, New York, in press

    Google Scholar 

  • Seiler W (1978) The influence of the biosphere on the atmospheric CO and H2 cycles. In: Krumbein WE (ed) Environmental biogeochemistry and geomicrobiology, vol 3. Ann Arbor Science Publ Ann Arbor, MI, pp 773–810

    Google Scholar 

  • Seiler W, Giehl H, Roggendorf P (1980) Detection of carbon monoxide and hydrogen by conversion of mercury oxide to mercury vapor. Atmos Technol 12:40–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Seitz H-J, Cypionka H (1986) Chemolithotrophic growth of Desulfovibrio desulfuricans with hydrogen coupled to ammonification of nitrate. Arch Microbiol 146:63–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Strayer RF, Tiedje JM (1978) Kinetic parameters of the conversion of methane precursors to methane in hypereutrophic lake sediment. Appl Environ Microbiol 36:330–340

    Google Scholar 

  • Thauer RK, Jungermann K, Decker K (1977) Energy conservation in chemotrophic anaerobic bacteria. Bacteriol Rev 41:100–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Traoré SA, Hatchikian EC, Belaich JP, LeGall J (1981) Microcalorimetric studies of the growth of sulfate-reducing bacteria. Energetics of D. vulgaris growth. J Bacteriol 45:191–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Tschech A, Pfennig N (1984) Growth yield increase linked to caffeate reduction in Acetobacterium woodii. Arch Microbiol 137:163–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsuji K, Yagi T (1980) Significance of hydrogen burst from growing cultures of Desulfovibrio vulgaris, Miyazaki and the role of hydrogenase and cytochrome c3 in energy producing system. Arch Microbiol 125:35–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Tzeng SF, Bryant MP, Wolfe RS (1975) Factor 420-dependent pyridine nucleotide-linked formate metabolism of Methanobacterium ruminantium. J Bacteriol 121:192–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward DM, Winfrey MR (1986) Interactions between methanogenic and sulfate-reducing bacteria in sediments. Adv Aquat Microbiol 3:141–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Widdel F, Pfennig N (1984) Dissimilatory sulfate- or sulfur-reducing bacteria. In: Krieg NR, Holt JG (eds) Bergey's manual of systematic bacteriology. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore London, pp 663–679

    Google Scholar 

  • Winfrey MR, Zeikus JG (1977) Effect of sulfate on carbon and electron flow during microbial methanogenesis in freshwater sediments. Appl Environ Microbiol 33:275–281

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolin MJ (1982) Hydrogen transfer in microbial communities. In: Bull AT, Slater JH (eds) Microbial interactions and communicaties. Academic Press, London, pp 475–543

    Google Scholar 

  • Zehnder AJB (1978) Ecology of methane formation. Water pollution Microbiol 2:349–376

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Parts of this work (grant to R C-R) was supported by the European Community (ST2A-0022)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cord-Ruwisch, R., Seitz, HJ. & Conrad, R. The capacity of hydrogenotrophic anaerobic bacteria to compete for traces of hydrogen depends on the redox potential of the terminal electron acceptor. Arch Microbiol 149, 350–357 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00411655

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00411655

Key words

Navigation