Skip to main content
Log in

Spatial heterogeneity, population “regulation” and local extinction in simulated host-parasitoid interactions

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Simulation models have recently been used to suggest that spatial heterogeneity, acting on small spatial scales within local populations, may allow parasitoids and other natural enemies to “regulate” host or prey populations in ways that would not be detected by conventional (k-factor) analyses of life table data. However, additional study of these models suggests that local extinction may be a frequent event in the simulated interactions. The “spreading of risk” concept appears more applicable to the simulated populations than a classical view emphasizing tight regulation around stable equilibrium points. The spreading of risk viewpoint also appears to shed additional light on questions raised in the recent debate between Dempster (1983); Hassel (1985); Dempster and Pollard (1986), concerning the modeling of spatial heterogeneity and “regulation” in temperate-zone insect populations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrewartha HG, Birch LC (1954) The Distribution and Abundance of Animals. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Beddington JR, Free CA, Lawton JH (1976) Concepts of stability and resilience in predator-prey models. J Anim Ecol 45:791–816

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesson PL (1978) Predator-prey theory and variability. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 9:323–347

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesson PL, Murdoch WW (1986) Aggregation of risk: Relationships among host-parasitoid models. Am Nat 127:696–715

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell JH, Sousa WP (1983) On the evidence needed to judge ecological stability or persistence. Am Nat 121:789–824

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowley PH (1981) Dispersal and the stability of predator-prey interactions. Am Nat 118:673–701

    Google Scholar 

  • Dayton PK (1971) Competition, disturbance and community organization: the provision and subsequent utilization of space in a rocky intertidal community. Ecol Monogr 41:351–389

    Google Scholar 

  • Dempster JP (1983) The natural control of populations of butterflies and moths. Biol Rev 58:461–481

    Google Scholar 

  • Dempster JP, Pollard E (1986) Spatial heterogeneity, stochasticity and the detection of density dependence in animal populations. Oikos 46:413–416

    Google Scholar 

  • den Boer PJ (1968) Spreading of risk and stabilization of animal numbers. Acta Biotheoretica 18:165–194

    Google Scholar 

  • den Boer PJ (1981) On the survival of populations in a heterogeneous and variable environment. Oecologia (Berlin) 50:39–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich PR (1965) The population biology of the butterfly, Euphydryas editha. II. The structure of the Jasper Ridge colony. Evolution 11:327–336

    Google Scholar 

  • Fahrig L, Merriam G (1985) Habitat patch connectivity and population survival. Ecology 66:1762–1768

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurney WSC, Nisbet RM (1978) Predator-prey fluctuations in patchy environments. J An Ecol 47:85–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassell MP (1978) The Dynamics of Arthropod Predator-Prey Systems. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassell MP (1985) Insect natural enemies as regulating factors. J Anim Ecol 54:323–334

    Google Scholar 

  • Hastings A (1977) Spatial heterogeneity and the stability of predator-prey systems. Theor Popul Biol 12:37–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Hastings A (1978) Spatial heterogeneity and the stability of predator-prey systems: Predator-mediated coexistence. Theor Popul Biol 14:380–395

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling CS (1973) Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 4:1–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin SA (1976) Population dynamics in heterogeneous environments. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 7:287–310

    Google Scholar 

  • May RM (1978) Host-parasitoid systems in patchy environments: A phenomenological model. J Anim Ecol 47:833–843

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith J (1974) Models in Ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Murdoch WW, Reeve JR, Huffaker CB, Kennett CE (1984) Biological control of olive scale and its relevance to ecological theory. Am Nat 123:371–392

    Google Scholar 

  • Murdoch WW, Chesson J, Chesson PL (1985) Biological control in theory and practice. Am Nat 125:344–366

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickett STA, White PS (1985) The Ecology of Natural Disturbance and Patch Dynamics (eds). Academic Press, Orlando

    Google Scholar 

  • Price PW (1980) Evolutionary Biology of Parasites. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddingius J, den Boer PJ (1970) Simulation experiments illustrating stabilization of animal numbers by spreading of risk. Oecologia (Berlin) 5:240–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Roff DA (1974) The analysis of a population model demonstrating the importance of dispersal in a heterogeneous environment. Oecologia (Berlin) 15:259–275

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandermeer JH (1973) On the regional stabilization of locally unstable predator-prey relationships. J Theor Biol 41:161–170

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Morrison, G., Barbosa, P. Spatial heterogeneity, population “regulation” and local extinction in simulated host-parasitoid interactions. Oecologia 73, 609–614 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00379424

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00379424

Key words

Navigation