Abstract
This paper examines the implications for the use of trade measures as “weapons” to address global environmental concerns. There are already proposals in the U.S. senate to impose an environmental tariff against foreign nations whose cost advantages stem from less stringent environmental standards than the U.S. The paper argues that trade policy measures typically are not the first best instruments for achieving environmental objectives. Even theoretically they could be shown to be welfare improving only under a very narrow range of circumstances. Their use in place of more efficient policy instruments may not only end up distorting the patterns of world trade but also may worsen the overall patterns of environmental quality. Simulation exercises undertaken here suggest that it is highly unlikely that countries would alter their environmental behavior because of the imposition of the proposed U.S. tariff. Hence the proposed legislation has very uncertain environmental consequences. Even if the policy has been mainly designed to protect domestic industries, it would only provide a minor margin of protection because the costs of complying with the environmental standards represent a relatively small element in the total costs. The analysis suggests that trade policy introduced in this fashion will have no significant impact on the patterns of world trade and pollution.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baldwin, Robert and Tracy, Murray (1977), ‘MFN Tariff Reductions and Developing Country Benefits Under the GSP’, The Economic Journal 87, 30–46.
Baumol, William J. and W. E., Oates (1988), The Theory of Environmental Policy, 2nd edition, 266–278, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Birdsall, N. and D., Wheeler (1993), ‘Trade Policy and Industrial Pollution in Latin America: Where Are he Pollution Havens’, Journal of Environment and Development 2 (1, Winter), 137–149.
Brodin, A. and D., Blades (1986), ‘The O.E.C.D. Compatible Trade and Production Data Base 1970–1983’, O.E.C.D. Working Paper Number 31, 1–81, Paris: O.E.C.D. Economics and Statistics Department.
Cline, W. R., N., Kawanabe, T. O. M., Kronsjo and T., Williams (1978), ‘Trade Negotiations in the Tokyo Round: A Quantitative Assessment’, pp. 36–40. Washington D.C.: The Brookings Institution.
Duerkson, C. and H. J. Leonard (1980), ‘Environmental Regulations and the Location of Industries: An International Perspective’, Columbia Journal of World Business Summer 1980, 52–68.
Hazilla, M. and R. J., Kopp (1990), ‘Social Cost of Environmental Quality Regulations: A General Equilibrium Analysis’, Journal of Political Economy 94, 853–873.
Kalt, J. P. (1985), ‘Impact of Domestic Environmental Policies on U.S. International Competitiveness’, Energy and Environmental Policy Center Discussion Paper No: 1411. Cambridge: Harvard Institute of Economic Research.
Laird, S. and A., Yeast (1990), Quantitative Methods for Trade Barrier Analysis, pp. 59–87. New York: New York University Press.
Leonard, H. J. (1980), Pollution and the Struggle for the World Product, pp. 83–116. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Low, Patrick (1992), ‘Trade Measures and Environmental Quality: The Implications for Mexico's Exports’, International Trade and the Environment, World Bank Discussion Papers 159, 105–120.
Markusen, J. R. (1975), ‘International Externalities and Optimal Tax Structures’, The Journal of International Economics 5, 15–29.
O.E.C.D. (1990), Pollution Abatement and Control Expenditures in O.E.C.D. Countries: A Statistical Compendium, Paris: O.E.C.D.
O.E.C.D. (1992), Industrial Structure Statistics, Paris: O.E.C.D.
O.E.C.D. (1993), Pollution Abatement and Control Expenditures in O.E.C.D. Countries: Environment Monographs, No. 75, Paris: O.E.C.D.
Panagariya, A., K. Palmer, W. E. Oates and A. Krupnick (1993), ‘Towards an Integrated Theory of Open Economy Environmental and Trade Policy’, University of Maryland Working Paper No: 93-8, College Park, MD 20742, U.S.A.
Pasurka, C. (1984), ‘The Short Run Impact of Environmental Protection Costs on U.S. Product Prices’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 11, 380–390.
Pomfret, R. (1986), ‘Effects of Trade Preferences for Developing Countries’, Southern Economic Journal 53, 18–26.
Richardson, J. D. and J. H., Mutti, (1976), ‘Industrial Development Through Environmental Controls: the International Competitive Aspect’, in Ingo, Walter (ed.), Studies in International Environmental Economics, pp. 57–102, New York: John Wiley and Sons Inc.
Richardson, J. D. (1977), ‘International Competitive Displacement from Environmental Control’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 4, 135–152.
Robison, D. H. (1985), ‘Who Pays for Industry Pollution Abatement?’, Review of Economics and Statistics 67, 702–706.
Robison, D. H. (1988), ‘Industrial Pollution Abatement: The Impact on the Balance of Trade’, Canadian Journal of Economics 21, 702–706.
Shoven, J. B., and J., Whalley (1984), ‘Applied General Equilibrium Models of Taxation and International Trade’, Journal of Economic Literature 22, 1007–1051.
Tobey, J. A. (1990), ‘The Effects of Domestic Environmental Policies on Patterns of World Trade: An Empirical Test’, Kyklos 43, Fasc. 2, 191–209.
Walter, I. (1973), ‘The Pollution Content of American Trade’, Western Economic Journal 11, 61–70.
Walter, I. (1982), ‘Environmentally Induced Industrial Relocation to Developing Countries’, in S., Rubin (ed.), Environmental and Trade, New Jersey: Allanheld, Osmum & Co.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mani, M.S. Environmental tariffs on polluting imports. Environ Resource Econ 7, 391–411 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00369626
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00369626