Skip to main content
Log in

Indentation size effect: reality or artefact?

  • Papers
  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this investigation was to study the load dependence of the microhardness, typically in the range 5–500 gf. This well known phenomena is called the indentation size effect (ISE) and was investigated for two sets of specimens: titanium and aluminium alloys. Variation of the hardness with applied load was first compared with various existing models and the surface profile, near the indent, was measured by confocal microscopy. The formation of pile-ups near the indentation print led to the correction of the indent diagonal which is found to fit well with our experimental data as well as with other results in the literature. For the materials investigated, the ISE effect is an artefact, i.e. the variation of hardness with the applied load is only a consequence of the variation of the contact surface between the specimen and the indenter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. P. M. Sargent, in “Microindentation Techniques in Materials Sciences and Engineering”, ASTM STP 889, edited by P. J. Blau and B. R. Lawn (American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, 1986) pp. 160–174.

    Google Scholar 

  2. B. W. Mott, in “Microindentation Hardness Testing” (Butterworths, London, 1957).

    Google Scholar 

  3. H. Buckle, in “Science of Hardness Testing and Its Research Applications”, edited by J. H. Westbrook and H. Conrad (American Society for Metals, Metals Park, Ohio, 1971) ch. 33, pp. 453–491.

    Google Scholar 

  4. D. Tabor, Rev. Phys. Technol. 1 (1970) 145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Idemin “Microindentation Techniques in Materials Science and Engineering”, ASTM STP 889, edited by P. J. Blau and B. R. Lawn (American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, 1986) pp. 129–159.

    Google Scholar 

  6. C. Hays and E. G. Kendall, Metallog. 6 (1973) 275.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. H. Li and R. C. Bradt, J. Mater. Sci. 28 (1993) 917.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. E. O. Bernhardt, Z. Metallkde 33 (1941) 135.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. F. Fröhlich, P. Grau and W. Grellmann, Phys. Status Solidi A 42 (1977) 79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. O. Vingsbo, S. Hogmark, B. Jönsson and A. Ingermarson, in “Microindentation Techniques in Materials Science and Engineering”, ASTM STP 889, edited by P. J. Blau and B. R. Lawn (American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, 1986) pp. 257–271.

    Google Scholar 

  11. A. Thomas, Surf. Eng. 3 (1987) 117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. J. P. Riviere, P. Guesdon, G. Farges and D. Degout, Surf. Coatings Technol. 42 (1990) 81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. G. Farges and D. Degout, Thin Solid Films 181 (1989) 365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. T. Yokohata and K. Kato, Wear 168 (1993) 109.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. N. A. Stelmashenko, M. G. Walls, L. M. Broxwn and Yu. V. Milman, Acta Metall. Mater. 41 (1993) 2855.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Iost, A., Bigot, R. Indentation size effect: reality or artefact?. JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE 31, 3573–3577 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00360764

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00360764

Keywords

Navigation