Skip to main content
Log in

The role of burrowing sponges in bioerosion

  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Among the large number of limestone-eroding organisms, sponges, mainly of the family Clinonidae are of special interest because of their efficient means of substratum penetration by cellular etching and because they release characteristically shaped calcium carbonate chips which can be detected in the mud-size fraction of many sediments. Identifiable trace fossils and sediments are of great ecological and paleoecological significance.

As new data on the excavating mechanism have become available, the questions of burrowing rates and sediment production have gained importance. Extrapolation from shortterm experiments (under 6 months) on substrate invasion are inconclusive because of high initial penetration rates resulting from mechanical stimulation and lack of competition. New experiments show that the rate curve flattens after 6 months and that optimum longterm erosion of CaCO3 does not exceed 700 mg m-2 year-1 (Cliona lampa and C. aprica). Substrate limitations and competition will further reduce this rate.

By monitoring the production of CaCO3 chips by Cliona lampa, it was possible to link activity patterns to certain environmental factors. Mechanical stimuli, high light intensity, strong currents and, possibly, low temperature seem to accelerate the burrowing process. Sponge-generated chips can make up over 40% of coral mud when deposited in the current shadow of the reef framework.

Using transect counts and sponge area-biomass conversion factors, the mean abundance of burrowing sponges on the Bermuda platform could be calculated. On suitable hard bottom substrates it averages 16 g dry weight per m2. From this value the burrowing potential of sponges can be estimated as 256 g CaCO3 per m2 substrate per year. Since 97–98% of the eroded limestone remains in particulate form, the contribution of fine sediments can amount to 250 g m-2 year-1.

Attention is called to the fact that erosion rates by burrowers can not directly be compared with those of borers or scrapers. The former are intermittent and their activities are affected by environmental and biological interactions, while activities of the latter are rather constant and guided by the need for food.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bardach, J. E.: Transport of calcareous fragments by reef fishes. Science 133, 98–99 (1961)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bromley, R. G.: Borings as trace fossils and Entobia cretacea Portlock, as an example. In: T. P. Crimes, J. C. Harper, eds., Trace fossils. Geol. J., Special Issue 3, 49–90 (1970)

  • Bromley, R. G., Tendal, O. S.: Example of substrate competition and phototropism between two clionid sponges. J. Zool. Lond. 169, 151–155 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  • Carriker, M. R., Smith, E. H.: Comparative calcibiocavitology: summary and conclusions. Amer. Zoologist 9, 1011–1020 (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  • Clapp, W. F., Kenk, R.: Marine borers, an annotated bibliography, 1136 pp. Washington, D.C.: Office of Naval Research, Department of the Navy 1963

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, W. R.: Penetration of calcium carbonate substrates by the boring sponge, Cliona. Amer. Zoologist 9, 783–790 (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  • Driscoll, E. G.: Attached epifauna-substrate relations. Limnol. Oceanogr. 12, 633–641 (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fütterer, D. K.: Significance of the boring sponge Cliona for the origin of fine grained material of carbonate sediments. J. sediment. Petrol. 44, 79–84 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginsburg, R. N.: Early diagenesis and lithification of shallow-water carbonate sediments in south Florida. Spec. Publ. Soc. Econ. Paleontologists and Mineralogists 5, 80–100 (1957)

    Google Scholar 

  • Glynn, P. W.: Aspects of the ecology of coral reefs in the western Atlantic region. In: O. A. Jones, R. Endean, eds., Biology and geology of coral reefs, vol. 1, Biology, p. 271–324. New York-London: Academic Press 1973

    Google Scholar 

  • Goreau, T. F., Hartman, W. D.: Boring sponges as controlling factors in the formation and maintenance of coral reefs. In: R. F. Sognnaes, ed., Mechanisms of hard tissue destruction. Publ. Amer. Assn. Advmt. Sci. 75, 25–54 (1963)

  • Hartman, W. D.: Ecological niche differenciation in the boring sponges (Clionidae). Evolution 11, 294–297 (1957)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartman, W. D.: Natural history of the marine sponges of southern New England. Bull. Peabody Mus. nat. Hist. 12, 1–155 (1958)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatch, W.: Physiology of shell penetration by Cliona celata (Abstract) In: M. R. Carriker, ed. Ninth and Tenth Annual Reports on Progress and Ten Year Summary, Systematics-Ecology Program, Woods Hole, Massachusetts, p. 13–14 (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoese, H. D., Durant, J. E.: Notes on the boring sponges of Georgia. Completion Report. Project 2-10-R. Ga. Game and Fish Comm., 7 pp. (1968)

  • Hopkins, S. H.: The boring sponges which attack South Carolina oysters, with notes on some associated organisms. Contr. Bears Bluff Labs. 23, 1–30 (1956)

    Google Scholar 

  • Krumbein, W. E., Van der Pers J. N. C.: Diving investigations on biodeterioration by sea-urchins in the rocky sublittoral of Helgoland. Helgoländer wiss. Meeresunters. 26, 1–17 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  • Laubenfels, M. W. de: An ecological discussion of the sponges of Bermuda. Trans. Zool. Soc. Lond. 27, 155–201 (1950)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, D. R.: The use of clionid sponges in paleoenvironmental analyses. J. Paleont. 43, 539–543 (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, A. C.: Processes of recent carbonate sedimentation in Harrington Sound, Bermuda. Bull. Marine Sci. 15, 987–1035 (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, A. C.: Observations on coastal erosion in Bermuda and measurements of the boring rate of the sponge, Cliona lampa. Limnol. Oceanogr. 11, 92–108 (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  • Otter, G. W.: Rock-destroying organisms in relation to coral reefs. Sci. Rept. Great Barrier Reef Exped. 1, 323–352 (1937)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pang, R. K.: The ecology of some Jamaican excavating sponges. Bull. Marine Sci. 23, 227–243 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rützler, K.: The burrowing sponges of Bermuda. Smithsonian Contr. Zool. 165, 1–32 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rützler, K., Rieger, G.: Sponge burrowing: Fine structure of Cliona lampa penetrating calcareous substrata. Marine Biology 21, 144–162 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarà, M.: Studio quantitativo della distribuzione dei Poriferi in ambienti superficiali della Riviera Ligure di Levante. Arch. Oceanogr. Limnol. 14, 365–386 (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  • Volz, P.: Die Bohrschwämme (Clioniden) der Adria. Thalassia 3, 1–64 (1939)

    Google Scholar 

  • Warburton, F. E.: The manner in which the sponge Cliona bores in calcareous objects. Canad. J. Zool. 36, 555–562 (1958)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This work was supported by the Smithsonian Research Foundation, by the Smithsonian Environmental Sciences Program and by a Sydney L. Wright Fellowship, at the Bermuda Biological Station. Contribution No. 619, Bermuda Biological Station. Contribution No. 10, Investigations of Marine Shallow Water Ecosystems Project, Smithsonian Institution.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rützler, K. The role of burrowing sponges in bioerosion. Oecologia 19, 203–216 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00345306

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00345306

Keywords

Navigation