Abstract
Continuous movement of striped patterns was presented on either side of a tethered fruitfly, Drosophila melanogaster, in order to simulate the displacement of stationary landmarks within the visual field of the freely moving fly. The horizontal components of the stimulus elicit, predominantly, yaw-torque responses during flight, or turning responses on the ground, which counteract involuntary deviations from a streight course in the corresponding mode of locomotion. The vertical components elicit, predominantly, covariant responses of lift and thrust which enable the fly to maintain a given level of flight. Monocular stimulation is sufficient to produce antagonistic responses, if the direction of the stimulus is reversed. The following constituents of the responses were derived mainly from properties of wing beat and body posture on photographs of fixed flight under visual stimulation. Wing stroke modulation (W. S. M.): The difference, and the sum, of the stroke amplitudes on either side are independently controlled by horizontal and vertical movement components, respectively. The maximum range of modulation per wing (12.3°) is equivalent to a 63% change in thrust on the corresponding side. Leg stroke modulation (L.S.M.): In the walking fly each pair of legs is under control of visual stimulation. The details of leg articulation are still unknown. Abdominal deflection (A.D.): An actively induced posture effect. Facilitates steering during free flight at increased air speed. Hind leg deflection (H.L.D.): Same as before. On most of the photographs the hind legs were deflected simultaneously and in the same direction as the abdomen. Hitch inhibition (H.I.): The term “hitch” denotes a transient reduction of stroke amplitude which seems to occur spontaneously and independently on either side of the fly. The hitch angle (12.2±3.8° S.D.) is most probably invariant to visual stimulation. Hitches are comparatively frequent in the absence of pattern movement. Their inhibition under visual stimulation is equivalent to an increase of the average thrust of the corresponding wing. The different constituents contribute to the optomotor responses according to the following tentative scheme (Fig. 7). The torque response is essentially due to the effects of W.S.M., A.D., H.L.D. and H.I., and the turning response to L.S.M. and possibly H.L.D., if the landmarks drift from anterior to posterior. So far, H.I. seems to be the only source of the torque response, and L.S.M. the only source of the turning response, if the landmarks drift in the opposite direction. The lift/thrust response results essentially from the effects of W.S.M. and H.I., no matter whether the landmarks drift from inferior to superior or in the opposite direction. The results obtained so far suggest that the optomotor control of course and altitude in Drosophila requires at least eight independent input channels or equivalent means for the separation of the descending signals from the visual centres. Further extension and refinement of the “wiring scheme” is required in order to improve the identification of the sensory inputs of the motor system and the classification of optomotor defective mutants.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bellesme, J. de: Sur une fonction de direction dans le vol des insects. Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. 89b (1879)
Blondeau, J.: Electrically evoked motor activity in the fly. Thesis, Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen 1977
Bishop, L.G., Keehn, D.G., McCann, G.D.: Motion detection by interneurons of the optic lobes and brain of the flies, Calliphora phaenicia and Musca domestica. J. Neurophysiol. 31, 509–525 (1968)
Boettiger, E.G., Furshpan, E.: The mechanics of flight movements in Diptera. Biol. Bull. 102, 200–211 (1952)
Buchner, E.: Elementary movement detectors in an insect visual system. Biol. Cybernetics 24, 85–101 (1976)
Buchner, E., Götz, K.G., Straub, C.: Elementary detectors for vertical movement in the visual system of Drosophila. Biol Cybernetics 31, 235–242 (1978)
Camhi, J.M.: Yaw-correcting postural changes in locusts. J. Exp. Biol. 52, 519–531 (1970a)
Camhi, J.M.: Sensory control of abdomen posture in flying locusts. J. Exp. Biol. 52, 533–537 (1970b)
Collett, T.S., King, A.J.: Vision during flight. In: The compound eye and vision of insects. Horridge, G.A. (ed.), pp. 437–466. Oxford: Clarendon Press 1975
Collett, T.S., Land, M.F.: Visual control of flight behaviour in the hoverfly, Syritta pipiens L. J. Comp. Physiol. 99, 1–66 (1975)
David, C.T.: The relationship between body angle and flight speed in free-flying Drosophila. Physiol. Entomol. 3, 191–195 (1978)
DeVoe, R., Ockleford, E.M.: Intracellular responses from cells of the medulla of the fly, Calliphora erythrocephala. Biol. Cybernetics 23, 13–24 (1976)
Dvorak, D.R., Bishop, L.G., Eckert, H.E.: On the identification of movement detectors in the fly optic lobe. J. Comp. Physiol. 100, 5–23 (1975)
Eckert, H.E.: Response properties of dipteran giant visual interneurons involved in control of optomotor behaviour. Nature 271, 358–360 (1978)
Eckert, H.E., Bishop, L.G.: Anatomical and physiological properties of the vertical cells in the third optic ganglion of Phaenicia sericata. J. Comp. Physiol. 126, 57–86 (1978)
Ewing, A.W.: The neuromuscular basis of courtship song in Drosophila: The role of the direct and axillary wing muscles. J. Comp. Physiol. 130, 87–93 (1979)
Franceschini, N.: Sampling of the visual environment by the compound eye of the fly: Fundamentals and applications. In: Photoreceptor optics. Snyder, A.W., Menzel, R. (eds.), pp. 98–125. Berlin, Heidelberg. New York: Springer 1975
Geiger, G., Poggio, T.: On head and body movements of flying flies. Biol. Cybernetics 25, 177–180 (1977)
Gewecke, M., Philippen, J.: Control of the horizontal flight-course by air-current sense organs in Locusta migratoria. Physiol. Entomol. 3, 43–52 (1978)
Götz, K.G.: Flight control in Drosophila by visual perception of motion. Kybernetik 4, 199–208 (1968)
Götz, K.G.: Movement discrimination in insects. In: Processing of optical data by organisms and by machines. Rendiconti S.I.F. XLIII, pp. 494–509. Reichardt, W.E. (ed.), London, New York: Academic Press 1969
Götz, K.G.: Hirnforschung am Navigationssystem der Fliegen. Naturwissenschaften 62, 468–475 (1975a)
Götz, K.G.: The optomotor equilibrium of the Drosophila navigation system. J. Comp. Physiol. 99, 187–210 (1975b)
Götz, K.G., Buchner, E.: Evidence for one-way movement detection in the visual system of Drosophila. Biol. Cybernetics 31, 243–248 (1978)
Götz, K.G., Wenking, H.: Visual control of locomotion in the walking fruitfly Drosophila. J. Comp. Physiol. 85, 235–266 (1973)
Hausen, K.: Struktur, Funktion und Konnektivität bewegungsempfindlicher Interneurone im dritten optischen Neuropil der Schmeißfliege Calliphora erythrocephala. Thesis, Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen, 1976a
Hausen, K.: Functional characterization and anatomical identification of motion sensitive neurons in the lobula plate of the blowfly Calliphora erythrocephala. Z. Naturforsch., Teil C 31, 629–633 (1976b)
Hausen, K.: Signal processing in the insect eye. In: Function and formation of neural systems. Stent, G.S. (ed.) pp. 81–110. Berlin, Danlem Konferenzen 1977
Heide G.: Flugsteuerung durch nicht-fibrilläre Flugmuskeln bei der Schmeißfliege Calliphora. Z. Vgl. Physiol. 59, 456–460 (1968)
Heide, G.: Die Funktion der nicht-fibrillären Flugmuskeln von Calliphora. I. Lage, Insertionsstellen und Innervierungsmuster der Muskeln. Zool. Jahrb., Abt. Allg. Zool. Physiol. Tiere 76, 87–98 (1971a)
Heide, G.: Die Funktion der nicht-fibrillären Flugmuskeln von Calliphora. II. Muskuläre Mechanismen der Flugsteuerung und ihre nervöse Kontrolle. Zool. Jahrb., Abt. Allg. Zool. Physiol. Tiere 76, 99–137 (1971b)
Heide, G.: Properties of a motor output system involved in the optomotor response in flies. Biol. Cybernetics 20, 99–112 (1975)
Heide, G.: Proprioceptorische Beeinflussung der Impulsmusterbildung im neuromotorischen System fliegender Dipteren. Verh. Dtsch. Zool. Ges. 1978, 256
Heisenberg, M.: Comparative behavioral studies on two visual mutants of Drosophila. J. Comp. Physiol. 80, 119–136 (1972)
Heisenberg, M., Buchner, E.: The rôle of retinula cell types in visual behaviour of Drosophila melanogaster. J. Comp. Physiol. 117, 127–162 (1977)
Heisenberg, M., Götz, K.G.: The use of mutations for the partial degradation of vision in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Comp. Physiol. 98, 217–241 (1975)
Heisenberg, M., Wolf, R.: On the fine structure of yaw torque in visual flight orientation of Drosophila melanogaster. J. Comp. Physiol. 130, 113–130 (1979)
Heisenberg, M., Wonneberger, R., Wolf, R.: Optomotor-blind H31—a Drosophila mutant of the lobula plate giant neurons. J. Comp. Physiol. 124, 287–296 (1978)
Hengstenberg, R.: The effect of pattern movement on the impulse activity of the cervical connective of Drosophila melanogaster. Z. Naturforsch., Teil C 28, 593–596 (1973)
Hengstenberg, R.: Spike response of “non-spiking” visual interneurone. Nature 270 338–340 (1977)
McCann, G.D., Dill, J.C.: Fundamental properties of intensity, form, and motion perception in the visual nervous system of Calliphora phaenicia and Musca domestica. J. Gen. Physiol. 53, 385–413 (1969)
McCann, G.D., Foster, S.F.: Binocular interactions of motion detection fibers in the optic lobes of flies. Kybernetik 8, 193–203 (1971)
Mimura, K.: Neural mechanisms, subserving directional selectivity of movement in the optic lobe of the fly. J. Comp. Physiol. 80, 409–437 (1972)
Mulloney, B.: Interneurons in the central nervous system of flies and the start of flight. Z. Vgl. Physiol. 64, 243–253 (1969)
Nachtigall, W., Wilson, D.: Neuro-muscular control of dipteran flight. J. Exp. Biol. 47, 77–97 (1967)
Pfau, H.K.: Fliegt unsere Schmeißfliege mit Gangschaltung? Naturwissenschaften 60, 160–161 (1973)
Pick, B.: Visual pattern discrimination as an element of the fly's orientation behaviour. Biol. Cybernetics 23, 171–180 (1976)
Pierantoni, R.: A look into the cock-pit of the fly. The architecture of the lobula plate. Cell Tissue Res. 171, 101–122 (1976)
Poggio, T., Reichardt, W.: Visual control of orientation behaviour in the fly. II. Towards the underlying neural interactions. Q. Rev. Biophys. 9, 377–438 (1976)
Pringle, J.W.S.: Insect flight. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press 1957
Reichardt, W., Poggio, T.: Visual control of orientation behaviour in the fly. I. A quantitative analysis. Q. Rev. Biophys. 9, 311–375 (1976)
Schneider, P.: Vergleichende Untersuchungen zur Steuerung der Fluggeschwindigkeit bei Calliphora vicina. Z. Wiss. Zool. 173, 114–173 (1965)
Smyth, T., Yurkiewicz, W.J.: Visual reflex control of indirect flight muscles in the sheep blowfly. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 17, 1175–1180 (1966)
Spüler, M., Heide, G.: Simultaneous recordings of torque, thrust and muscle spikes from the fly Musca domestica during optomotor responses. Z. Naturforsch., Teil C 33, 455–457 (1978)
Srinivasan, M.V.: A visually-evoked roll response in the housefly. J. Comp. Physiol. 119, 1–14 (1977)
Srinivasan, M.V., Bernard, G.D.: The pursuit response of the housefly and its interaction with the optomotor response. J. Comp Physiol. 115, 101–117 (1977)
Stellwaag, F.: Wie steuern Insekten während des Fluges? Biol. Zentralbl. 36, 30–44 (1916)
Strausfeld, N.J.: Atlas of an insect brain. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer 1976
Vogel, S.: Flight in Drosophila. I. Flight performance in tethered flies. J. Exp. Biol. 44, 567–578 (1966)
Vogel, S.: Flight in Drosophila. II. Variations in stroke parameters and wing contour. J. Exp. Biol. 46 383–392 (1967)
Voss, F.: Vergleichende Untersuchungen über die Flugwerkzeuge der Insekten, 2. Abhandlung. Verh. Dtsch. Zool. Ges. 24, 59–90 (1914)
Wehrhahn, C., Reichardt, W.: Visually induced height orientation of the fly Musca domestica. Biol. Cybernetics 20, 37–50 (1975)
Wehrhahn, C.: Flight torque and lift responses of the housefly (Musca domestica) to a single stripe moving in different parts of the visual field. Biol. Cybernetics 29, 237–247 (1978a)
Wehrhahn, C.: The angular orientation of the movement detectors acting on the flight lift response in flies. Biol. Cybernetics 31, 169–173 (1978b)
Wyman, R.J.: A simple network for the study of neurogenetics. In: Simpler networks and behavior. Fentress, J.C. (ed.), pp. 153–166. Sunderland, Mass.: Sinauer 1976
Zaagman, W.H., Mastebroek, H.A.K., Kuiper, J.W.: On the correlation model: Performance of a movement detecting neural element in the fly visual system. Biol. Cybernetics 31, 163–168 (1978)
Zalokar: Anatomie du thorax de Drosophila melanogaster. Rev. Suisse Zool. 54, 17–53 (1947)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Götz, K.G., Hengstenberg, B. & Biesinger, R. Optomotor control of wing beat and body posture in drosophila. Biol. Cybernetics 35, 101–112 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00337435
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00337435