Skip to main content
Log in

Bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) immunocytochemistry by exonuclease III (Exo III) digestion

  • Published:
Histochemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

A new procedure is described to generate single-stranded DNA by exonuclease III (Exo III) digestion for bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) immunocytochemistry on tissue sections. We compared this procedure with the most widely used procedure of DNA denaturation with 2 N HCl. In vivo and in vitro pulse and continuous labelling of tissues and cells were used. The specimens were fixed in formalin, ethanol, glutaraldehyde, Carnoy's, Bouin's or Zamboni's fixative and embedded in paraffin or used unfixed as cryostat sections or cytospin preparations. After Exo III digestion, BrdU substituted DNA was detected irrespective of the fixation procedure applied. The optimal protocol for nuclease digestion appeared to be simultaneous incubation, of 10 Units Exo III per ml EcoRI buffer and anti-BrdU monoclonal antibody at 37° C. The advantages of Exo III digestion for BrdU immunocytochemistry compared to acid denaturation were: less non-specific nuclear background reactivity, no DNA renaturation, less DNA loss, optimal nuclear morphology, increase in antibody efficiency and the possibility for simultaneous detection of acid-sensitive tissue constituents. Disadvantages of the Exo III digestion are decreased sensitivity and the need for more rigorous pepsin pretreatment. We conclude that Exo III digestion of DNA is an appropriate alternative for acid denaturation for BrdU immunocytochemistry on sections of pulse-labelled specimens.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bayer JA, De Vries P, Herweijer H, Bauman JGJ (1990) The use of E. coli exonuclease III to generate single stranded DNA in BrdUrd cell-cycle analysis permits simultaneous detection of cell surface antigens. J Immunol Methods 132:13–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Campana D, Coustan-Smith E, Janossy G (1988) Double and triple staining methods for studying the proliferative activity of human B and T lymphoid cells. J Immunol Methods 107:79–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean PN, Dolbeare F, Gratzner H, Rice GC, Gray JW (1984) Cell cycle analysis using a monoclonal antibody to BrdUrd. Cell Tissue Kinet 17:427–436

    Google Scholar 

  • De Fazio A, Tattersall MHN (1985) Rapid fluorometric detection of drug resistant tumour cells. Br J Cancer 52:633–636

    Google Scholar 

  • De Fazio A, Leary JA, Hedley DW, Tattersall MHN (1987) Immunohistochemical detection of proliferating cells in vivo. J Histochem Cytochem 35:571–577

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolbeare F, Gray JW (1988) Use of restriction endonucleases and exonuclease III to expose halogenated pyrimidines for immunochemical staining. Cytometry 9:631–635

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolbeare F, Beisker W, Pallavicini MG, Vanderlaan M, Gray JW (1985) Cytochemistry for bromodeoxyuridine/DNA analysis: stoichiometry and sensitivity. Cytometry 6:521–530

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonchoroff NJ, Greipp PR, Kyle RA, Katzmann JA (1985) A monoclonal antibody reactive with 5-bromo-2-deoxyuridine that does not require DNA denaturation. Cytometry 6:506–512

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonchoroff NJ, Katzmann JA, Currie RM, Evans EL, Houck DW, Kline BC, Greipp PR, Loken MR (1986) S-phase detection with an antibody to bromodeoxyuridine. Role of DNase pretreatment. J Immunol Methods 93:97–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Gratzner N (1982) Monoclonal antibody to 5-bromo- and 5-iododeoxyuridine: a new reagent for detection of DNA replication. Science 218:474–475

    Google Scholar 

  • Houck DW, Loken MR (1985) Simultaneous analysis of cell surface antigens, bromodeoxyuridine incorporation and DNA content. Cytometry 6:531–538

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman SJ, Robert-Nicoud M (1985) DNA replication and differentiation in rabbit myoblasts studied with monoclonal antibodies against 5-bromodeoxyuridine, actin and α2-macroglobulin. Cytometry 6:570–577

    Google Scholar 

  • Magaud JP, Sargent I, Clarke PJ, Ffrench M, Rimokh R, Mason DY (1989) Double immunocytochemical labeling of cell and tissue samples with monoclonal anti-bromodeoxyuridine. J Histochem Cytochem 37:1517–1527

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer JS, Nauert J, Koehm S, Hughes J (1989) Cell kinetics of human tumors by in vitro bromodeoxyuridine labeling. J Histochem Cytochem 37:1449–1454

    Google Scholar 

  • Raap AK, Marijnen JGJ, Vrolijk J, Van der Ploeg M (1986) Denaturation, renaturation, and loss of DNA during in situ hybridization procedures. Cytometry 7:235–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Raza A, Preisler HD, Mayers GL, Bankert R (1984a) Rapid enumeration of S-phase cells by means of monoclonal antibodies. N Engl J Med 310:991

    Google Scholar 

  • Raza A, Ucar K, Preisler HD (1984b) Double labelling and in vitro versus in vivo incorporation of bromodeoxyuridine in patients with acute non-lymphocytic leukaemia. Cytometry 6:633–640

    Google Scholar 

  • Raza A, Ucar K, Bhayana R, Kempski M, Preisler HD (1985) Utility and sensitivity of anti-BrdU antibodies in assessing S-phase cells compared to autoradiography. Cell Biochem Funct 3:149–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Schutte B, Reynders MJ, Bosman FT, Blijham GH (1987a) Studies with anti-bromodeoxyuridine antibodies: II. Simultaneous immunocytochemical detection of antigen expression and DNA synthesis by in vivo labeling of mouse intestinal mucosa. J Histochem Cytochem 35:371–374

    Google Scholar 

  • Schutte B, Reynders MMJ, Bosman FT, Blijham GH (1987b) Effect of tissue fixation on anti-bromodeoxyuridine immunohistochemistry. J Histochem Cytochem 35:1343–1345

    Google Scholar 

  • Schutte B, Reynders MMJ, Van Assche CLMVJ, Hupperets PSGJ, Bosman FT, Blijham GH (1987c) Studies with anti-bromodeoxyuridine antibodies. I. An improved method for the immunocytochemical detection of BrdU labeled nuclei using flowcytometry. Cytometry 8:372–376

    Google Scholar 

  • Stroobants C, Sossountzov L, Miginiac E (1990) DNA synthesis in excised tobacco leaves after bromodeoxyuridine incorporation: immunohistochemical detection in semi-thin spurr sections. J Histochem Cytochem 38:641–647

    Google Scholar 

  • Traincard P, Ternynck A, Danchin A, Avrameas S (1983) Une technique immunoenzymatique pour la mise en évidence de l'hybridation moleculaire entre acides nucleiques. Ann Immunol 134 D:399–405

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dekken H, Pinkel D, Mullikin J, Gray JW (1988) Enzymatic production of single-stranded DNA as a target for fluorescence in situ hybridization. Chromosoma 97:1–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanderlaan M, Thomas CB (1985) Characterization of monoclonal antibodies to bromodeoxyuridine. Cytometry 6:501–505

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Furth R, Van Zwet TL (1988) Immunocytochemical detection of 5-bromo-2-deoxyuridine incorporation in individual cells. J Immunol Methods 108:45–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Krimpen C, Schoemaker RG, Cleutjens JPM, Smits JFM, Struyker-Boudier HAJ, Bosman FT, Daemen MJAP (1991) Angiotensin I converting enzyme inhibitors and cardiac remodeling. Basic Res Cardiol 86 [Suppl 1]:149–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams LS, Nordberg JA, Chau PC (1990) Evaluation of immunocytochemical detection methods of incorporated bromodeoxyuridine in hybridomas. Cytometry 11:490–497

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dinjens, W.N.M., ten Kate, J., Lenders, M.H.J.H. et al. Bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) immunocytochemistry by exonuclease III (Exo III) digestion. Histochemistry 98, 199–205 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00315878

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00315878

Keywords

Navigation