Skip to main content
Log in

Results of surgical treatment of spinal thoracic and lumbar metastases

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The results of surgical treatment of vertebral metastases were evaluated from a retrospective review of a consecutive series of 100 patients, with special reference to anatomoclinical aspects and functional outcome. The primary tumour in most cases was lung, breast, or prostate; it was unknown in 11 cases. Diagnosis of the metastasis occurred 4–86 months after that of the primary tumour (lung metastasis: 4 months; breast metastasis: 86 months; prostatic metastasis: 22 months). Patients complained of vertebral pain in 96 cases and/or radicular pain in 43 cases. Intractable pain was observed in lung metastasis in particular. All patients received analgesics, and 57 received morphinics. Walking was impossible for 50 patients. Thirty-eight patients presented with neurologic deficit; neurologic status varied according to the primary tumour. Treatment included anterior surgery in 58 patients, posterior surgery in 33 patients, and combined surgery in 9 patients. Mean duration of hospitalisation was 12 days. No patient was admitted to the intensive care unit. Mean follow-up was 13.5 months. Eighty-nine patients were dead at follow-up, with an average survival of 10 months. Mean survival time was 7 months for patients with lung metastasis, 12 months for those with breast metastasis and 24 months for those with prostatic metastasis. Ten patients were still alive at follow-up (mean follow-up period 45 months, range 17–72 months). Analgesics were stopped for 62 patients following discharge from hospital. Morphinics had to be continued in seven patients. Thirty-five patients out of 50 (70%) recovered walking capacity. Neurologic status improved in 30 out of 38 patients. Although duration of survival was limited, surgery proved to be beneficial in providing a significant and early improvement in the functional status of more than 80% of patients. A precise evaluation of preoperative pain is necessary. Pain is dependent upon the bony lesion, the primary tumour, and the tumoral topography, which defines the surgical approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arguello F, Baggs RB, Duerst RE, Johnstone L, MacQueen K, Frantz CN (1990) Orthogenesis of vertebral metastasis and epidural spinal cord compression. Cancer 65:98–106

    Google Scholar 

  2. Asdourian PL, Weidembaum M, Dewald RL, Hammerberg KW, Ramsey RG (1990) The pattern of vertebral involvement in metastatic vertebral breast cancer. Clin Orthop 250:164–170

    Google Scholar 

  3. Denis F (1984) Spinal instability as defined by the three-column spine concept in acute spinal trauma. Clin Orthop 189:65–76

    Google Scholar 

  4. Deramond H, Debussche-Depriester C, Pruvo JP, Galibert P (1990) La vertébroplastie. Feuill Radiol 30:262–268

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dewald RL, Bridwell KH, Prodromas C, Rodts MF (1985) Reconstructive spinal surgery as palliation for metastatic malignancies of the spine. Spine 10:21–26

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fidler MW (1986) Anterior decompression and stabilization of metastatic spinal fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br 68:83–90

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hertlein AH, Mittlmeier T, Piltz S, Schürmann M, Kauschke T, Lob G (1992) Spinal stabilization for patients with metastatic lesions of the spine using a titanium spacer. Eur Spine J 1:131–136

    Google Scholar 

  8. Johnston AD (1970) Pathology of metastatic tumors in bone. Clin Orthop 73:8–32

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kocialkowski A, Webb JK (1992) Metastatic spinal tumours: survival after surgery. Eur Spine J 1:43–48

    Google Scholar 

  10. Livingston KE, Perrin RG (1978) The neurosurgical management of spinal metastases causing cord and cauda equina compression. J Neurosurg 49:839–843

    Google Scholar 

  11. O'Neil J, Gardner V, Armstrong G (1988) Treatment of tumors of the thoracic and lumbar spinal column. Clin Orthop 227:103–112

    Google Scholar 

  12. Onimus M (1990) Reconstruction antérieure de la colonne vertébrale. Cah Enseign Sofcot 38:175–185

    Google Scholar 

  13. Onimus M, Schraub S, Bertin D, Bosset JF, Guidet M (1986) Surgical treatment of vertebral metastasis. Spine 11: 883–891

    Google Scholar 

  14. Onimus M, Laurain JM, Gangloff S (1993) Le traitement chirurgical des métastases rachidiennes. Un acte thérapeutique bien maîtrisé contre la douleur et la compression neurologique. Rev Prat 43:72–75

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ortiz Gomez JA (1995) The incidence of vertebral body metastases. Intem Orthop (Sicot) 19:309–311

    Google Scholar 

  16. Schaberg J, Gainor BJ (1985) A profile of metastatic carcinoma of the spine. Spine 10:19–20

    Google Scholar 

  17. Siegal T, Tiqua P, Siegal T (1985) Vertebral body resection for epidural compression by malignant tumors. J Bone Joint Surg Am 67:375–382

    Google Scholar 

  18. Touboul E, Roy-Camille R, Guerin RA, Leonard P (1986) Tumeurs extradurales rachidiennes métastatiques. A propos de 130 cas. Semin Hop Paris 62:1785–1794

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Onimus, M., Papin, P. & Gangloff, S. Results of surgical treatment of spinal thoracic and lumbar metastases. Eur Spine J 5, 407–411 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00301969

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00301969

Key words

Navigation