Skip to main content
Log in

Husbands' sex-role preferences and contraceptive intentions: The case of the male pill

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Little attention has been given to examining the relationship between males' sex roles and their attitudes and behaviors regarding contraceptive issues. The present study addresses this shortcoming by examining the relationships among husbands' sex-role preferences, perceptions of contraceptive responsibility, and hypothetical intentions regarding the possible adoption of a male birth control pill. Data are drawn from a mailed survey of 49 husbands during 1982 in Columbus, Ohio. Egalitarian sex-role preferences are moderately related to a greater stated likelihood of male pill usage for the sample as a whole and more strongly related for husbands not overly concerned with the chemical nature of a male pill. Modern sex-role preferences are also related to husbands' perception of contraception as a shared responsibility, although this perception is not related to the stated likelihood of male pill usage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Balswick, J. O. Attitudes of lower class males toward taking a male birth control pill. The Family Coordinator, 1972, 21, 195–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benditt, J. M. Current contraceptive research. Family Planning Perspectives, 1980, 12, 149–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson, T. Impregnators of teenagers and their part in the pregnancy resolution decision, Doctoral dissertation. Detroit: Wayne State University, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blalock, H. Social statistics, 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bram, S. Through the looking glass: Voluntary childlessness as a mirror for contemporary changes in the meaning of parenthood. In W. B. Miller & L. F. Newman (Eds.), The first child and family formation. Chapel Hill, N.C.: Carolina Population Center, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, M. P., & Swicegood, G. Husband or wife? A multivariate analysis of decision making for voluntary sterilization. Journal of Family Issues, 1982, 3, 341–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, M. P., Bean, F. D., Swicegood, G., & Ansbacher, R. The decision for male versus female sterilization. The Family Coordinator, 1979, 28, 250–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, P. E., Cumber, B., & Hartner, R. Decision-making patterns and post decision adjustment of childfree husbands and wives. Alternative Lifestyles, 1978, 1, 71–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Djessari, C. The politics of contraception. New York: W. W. Norton, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Djessari, C. Birth control in the year 2001. The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 1981, 37, 24–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, G. L. Sex-role attributes as predictors of contraceptive use among unmarried university students. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 1977, 3, 265–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gough, H. G. Some factors related to men's stated willingness to use a male contraceptive pill. The Journal of Sex Research, 1979, 15, 27–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goyder, J. C. Further evidence on factors affecting response rates to mailed questionnaires. American Sociological Review, 1982, 47, 550–553.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heberlein, T. A., & Baumgartner, R. Factors affecting response rates to mailed questionnaires: A quantitative analysis of the published literature. American Sociological Review, 1978, 43, 447–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaccard, J., Hand, D., Ku, L., Richardson, K., & Abella, R. Attitudes toward male oral contraceptives: implications for models of the relationship between beliefs and attitudes. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1981, 11, 181–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luker, K. Talking chances: Abortion and the decision not to contracept. Chicago: University of California Press, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Misra, B. Correlates of males' attitudes toward family planning. In D. Bogue (Ed.), Sociological contributions to family planning. Chicago: Family and Community Study Center, University of Chicago, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mumford, S. D. The vascetomy decision-making process. Studies in Family Planning, 1983, 14, 83–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nieschlag, E., Wickings, E. J., & Breuer, H. Chemical methods for male fertility control: Expert consultation of the European Medical Research Council Adivsory Subgroup on Human Reproduction. Contraception, 1981, 23, 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, R. H., & Benson, T. The second-class partner: The male role in family-planning decisions. In G. L. Fox (Ed.), The childbearing decision: Fertility attitudes and behavior. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage, 1982, pp. 97–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scanzoni, J., & Szinovacz, M. Family decision-making: A developmental sex role model. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schearer, B. S. Current efforts to develop male hormonal contraception. Studies in Family Planning, 1978, 9, 229–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shain, R., & Jennings, V. A. The influence of sex roles on fertility. In R. N. Shain & C. J. Pauerstein (Eds.), Fertility control: Biologic and behavioral aspects. Hagerstown, Md.: Harper & Row, 1980, pp. 277–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spillane, W. H., & Ryser, P. E. Male fertility survery: Fertility knowledge, attitudes, and practices of married men. Cambridge, Mass. Ballinger, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokes, B. Men and family planning, Worldwatch Paper 41. Washington, D.C.: Worldwatch Institute, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stycos, J. M. A critique of the traditional planned parenthood approach in under-developed areas. In C. V. Kiser (Ed.), Research in family planning. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veevers, J. E. Voluntary childless wives: An exploratory study. Sociology and Social Research, 1973, 57, 356–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, S., & Goebel, G. The relationship between contraceptive sex role stereotyping and attitudes toward male contraception among males. The Journal of Sex Research, 1979, 15, 235–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westoff, C., & Jones, E. F. Patterns of aggregate and individual changes in contraceptive practice: United States, 1965–1975. Hyattsville, Md.: U.S. Department of Health Education and Welfare, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization Task Force on Psychosocial Research in Family Planning. Acceptability of drugs for male fertility regulation: A prospectus and some preliminary data. Contraception, 1980, 21, 121–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization Task Force on Psychosocial Research in Family Planning. Hormonal contraception for men: Acceptability and effects on sexuality. Studies in Family Planning, 1982, 13, 328–342.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

A preliminary version of this paper was presented at the North Central Sociological Association meeting in Columbus, Ohio, April 1983. I would like to thank Elizabeth G. Menaghan and Clyde W. Franklin, II, for their helpful critiques of early drafts of this paper. I am also indebted to an anonymous reviewer for his/her critical comments.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Marsiglio, W. Husbands' sex-role preferences and contraceptive intentions: The case of the male pill. Sex Roles 12, 655–663 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00288184

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00288184

Keywords

Navigation