Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Dismantling noah's ark

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Feminist theory and research have shown us that gender is a linchpin of social orders, but they have not seriously envisaged a social order without gender. Examination of the various bases of gender demonstrates that gender is essentially a social construction, and the relations between women and men are essentially social relations. What is socially constructed can be reconstructed, and social relations can be rearranged. A social order is possible without gender as an organizing principle. This paper takes forward tendencies and policies in postindustrial societies to show how, if carried through, they could be used to construct a nongendered social order.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altman, D. The homosexualization of America. Boston: Beacon Press, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amundsen, K. A new look at the silenced majority. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bengelsdorf, C., & Hageman, A. Emerging from underdevelopment: Women and work in Cuba. In Z. R. Eisenstein (Ed.), Capitalist patriarchy and the case for socialist feminism. New York: Monthly Review Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing. Psychological Review 1981, 88 354–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. Gender schema theory and its implications for child development: Raising gender-aschematic children in a gender-schematic society. Signs 1983, 8 598–616.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billings, D. B., & Urban, T. The socio-medical construction of transsexualism: An interpretation and critique. Social Problems 1982, 29, 266–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birdwhistell, R. L. Kinesics and context. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackwood, E. Sexuality and gender in certain native American tribes: The case of cross-gender females. Signs 1984, 10 27–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaxall, M., & Reagan, B. B. (Eds.) Women and the workplace: The implications of occupational segregation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumberg, R. L. Stratification: Socioeconomic and sexual inequality. Dubuque, Iowa: William C. Brown, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briscoe, A. M. Hormones and gender. In E. Tobach, & B. Rosoff (Eds.), Genes and gender: Hereditarianism and women. New York: Gordian Press, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. K. A note on the division of labor by sex. American Anthropologist 1970, 72 1073–1078.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chafetz, J. S. Sex and advantage. Totowa, N.J.: Rowman and Allanheld, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chodorow, N. The reproduction of mothering. Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chodorow, N. Feminism and difference: Gender, relation, and difference in psychoanalytic perspective. Socialist Review 1979, 9 51–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cucchiari, C. The gender revolution and transition from bisexual horde to patrilocal band: The origins of gender hierarchy. In S. B. Ortner & H. Whitehead (Eds.), Sexual meanings: The cultural construction of gender and sexuality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalsimer, M., & Nisonoff, L. The new economic readjustment polices: Implications for Chinese urban working women. Review of Radical Political Economics 1984, 16 17–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donovan, C. A question of self-expression. The New York Times Magazine, December 18, 1983, 108.

  • Eisenstein, Z. R. The radical future of liberal feminism. New York: Longman, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, C. F. Encountering the male establishment: Sex status limitations on women's careers in the professions. American Journal of Sociology 1970, 75 965–982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldberg, R. L. Comparable worth: Toward theory and practice in the United States. Signs 1984, 10 311–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fennell, M. L., Barchas, P. R., Cohen, E. G., McMahon, A. M., & Hildebrand, P. An alternative perspective on sex differences in organizational settings: The process of legitimation. Sex Roles 1978, 4 589–604.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedl, E. Women and men. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagnon, J. H., & Simon, J. W. Sexual conduct: The social sources of human sexuality. Chicago: Aldine, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilman, C. P. Herland. New York: Pntheon, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glazer, N. Y. Servants to capital: Unpaid domestic labor and paid work. Review of Radical Political Economics 1984, 16 61–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. Stigma Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartsock, N. C. M. Money, sex, and power. New York: Longman, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann, H. Capitalism, patiarchy, and job segregation by sex. In M. Blaxall & B. B. Reagan (Eds.), Women and the workplace: The implications of occupational segregation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooks, B. Feminist theory: From margin to center. Boston: South End Press, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jagger, A. M. Feminist politics and human nature. Totowa, N.J. Rowman & Allanheld, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, S. J., & McKenna, W. Gender: An ethnomethodological approach. New York: Wiley, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lapidus, G. W. Occupational segregation and public policy: A comparative analysis of American and Soviet patterns. In M. Blaxall & B. B. Reagan (Eds), Women and the workplace: The implications of occupational segregation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lapidus, G. W. Women in Soviet society. Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laws, J. L. The psychology of tokenism: An analysis. Sex Roles 1975, 1 51–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leacock, E. Women's status in egalitarian society: Implications for social evolution. Current Anthropology 1978, 19 247–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeGuin, U. K. The left hand of darkness. New York: Ace Books, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibowitz, L. Origins of the sexual division of labor. In M. Lowe & R. Hubbard (Eds.), Women's nature: Rationalizations of inequality. New York: Pergamon Press, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipman-Blumen, J. Toward a homosocial theory of sex roles: An explanation of the sex segregation of social institutions. In M. Blaxall & B. B. Reagan (Eds.), Women and the workplace: The implications of occupational segregation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loi, M. Chinese women and the “fourth rope.” Feminist Issues 1981, 1 51–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longino, H., & Doell, R. Body, bias, and behavior: A comparative analysis of reasoning in two areas of biological science. Signs 1983, 9 206–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorber, J. Beyond equality of the sexes: The question of the children. Family Coordinator 1975, 24 465–472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorber, J. Minimalist and maximalist feminist ideologies and strategies for change. Quarterly Journal of Ideology 1981, 5 61–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorber, J. Women physicians: Careers, status and power. New York & London: Tavistock, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, P. Y., & Osmond, M. Gender and exploitation: Resources, structure, and rewards in cross-sex social exchange. Sociological Focus 1982, 15 403–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marwell, G. Why ascription? Parts of a more or less formal theory of the functions and dysfunctions of sex roles. American Sociological Review 1975, 40 445–455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthaei, J. An economic history of women in America: Women's work, the sexual division of labor and the development of capitalism. New York: Schocken, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milkman, R. Organizing the sexual division of labor: Historical perspectives on “women's work” and the American labor movement. Socialist Review 1980, 49 95–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Money, J., & Ehrhardt, A. A. Man & woman, boy & girl. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, K. P., & Ayim, M. Comment on Bem's “Gender schema theory and its implications for child development: Raising gender-aschematic children in a gender-schematic society.” Signs 1984, 10 209–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naftolin, F., & Butz, E. (Eds.). Sexual dimorphism. Science 1981, 211 1263–1324.

  • Nazzari, M. The “woman question” in Cuba: An analysis of material constraints on its solution. Signs 1983, 10 246–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, B. J. Women's poverty and women's citizenship: Some political consequences of economic marginality. Signs 1984, 10 209–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okin, S. M. Women in western political thought. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrander, S. A. Women of the upper class. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paige, K. E., & Paige, J. M. The politics of reproductive ritual. Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, A., & Taylor, B. Sex and skill: Notes towards a feminist economics. Feminist Review 1980, 6 79–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piercy, M. Woman on the edge of time. New York: Fawcett Crest, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinchbeck, I. Women workers and the industrial revolution, 1750–1850. London: Virago Press, [1930] 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raymond, J. G. The transsexual empire. Boston: Beacon Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reskin, B. F. Sex differentiation and the social organization of science. Sociological Inquiry 1978, 48 3–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothman, B. K. How science is redefining parenthood. Ms. Magazine July/August, 1982, 11 154–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothman, B. K. The meanings of choice in reproductive technology. In R. Arditti, R. D. Klein, & S. Minden (Eds.), Test-tube women. London: Pandora Press, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, G. The traffic in women: Notes on the “political economy” of sex. In R. Reiter (Ed.), Toward an anthropology of women. New York: Monthly Review Press, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Safilios-Rothschild, C. Dual linkage between the occupational and family systems: A macrosociological analysis. In M. Blaxall & B. B. Reagan (Eds.), Women and the workplace: The implications of occupational segregation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Safilios-Rothschild, C. Sex role socialization and sex discrimination: A synthesis and critique of the literature. Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Education, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanday, P. R. Female power and male dominance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schur, E. Labeling women deviant: Gender, stigma, and social control. New York: Random House, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokoloff, N. J. Between money and love. New York: Praeger, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacey, J. The new conservative feminism. Feminist Studies 1983, 9 559–583. (a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacey, J. Patriarchy and socialist revolution in China. Berkeley, Calif.: California University Press, 1983. (b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Swafford, M. Sex differences in Soviet earnings. American Sociological Review 1978, 43 657–673.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treiman, D. J., & Hartmann, H. (Eds.), Women, work and wages: Equal pay for jobs of equal value. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treiman, D. J., & Roos, P. Sex and earnings in industrial society: A nine-nation comparison. American Journal of Sociology 1983, 89 616–650.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittig, M. One is not born a woman. Feminist Issues 1981, 1 47–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, W. C., & Fligstein, N. D. Sex and authority in the workplace. American Sociological Review 1979, 44 235–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolf, V. Three guineas. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, M. J. Reproductive hazards and “protective” discrimination. Feminist Studies, 1979.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Written with research support from PSC-CUNY Grant #14010. An earlier version was presented at the Eastern Sociological meetings, Boston, Massachusetts, March 1984. I am indebted to Nona Glazer for her comments.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lorber, J. Dismantling noah's ark. Sex Roles 14, 567–580 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287688

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287688

Keywords