Skip to main content
Log in

Naive realism about operators

  • Published:
Erkenntnis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A source of much difficulty and confusion in the interpretation of quantum mechanics is a “naive realism about operators.” By this we refer to various ways of taking too seriously the notion of operator-as-observable, and in particular to the all too casual talk about “measuring operators” that occurs when the subject is quantum mechanics. Without a specification of what should be meant by “measuring” a quantum observable, such an expression can have no clear meaning. A definite specification is provided by Bohmian mechanics, a theory that emerges from Schrödinger's equation for a system of particles when we merely insist that “particles” means particles. Bohmian mechanics clarifies the status and the role of operators as observables in quantum mechanics by providing the operational details absent from standard quantum mechanics. It thereby allows us to readily dismiss all the radical claims traditionally enveloping the transition from the classical to the quantum realm — for example, that we must abandon classical logic or classical probability. The moral is rather simple: Beware naive realism, especially about operators!

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AlbertD. Z.: 1992, Quantum Mechanics and Experience, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • BellJ. S.: 1964, ‘On the Einstein-Podolski-Rosen Paradox’, Physics 1, 195–200. Reprinted in Bell 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • BellJ. S.: 1966, ‘On the problem of hidden variables in quantum mechanics’, Review of Modern Physics 38, 447–452. Reprinted in Bell 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • BellJ. S.: 1981, ‘Quantum mechanics for cosmologists’, in Quantum Gravity 2, C.Isham, R.Penrose, and D.Sciama (eds.), Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 611–637. Reprinted in Bell 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • BellJ. S.: 1982, ‘On the impossible pilot wave’, Foundations of Physics 12, 989–999. Reprinted in Bell, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • BellJ. S.: 1987, Speakable and unspeakable in quantum mechanics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • BellJ. S.: 1990, ‘Against “measurement”’, Physics World 3, 33–40. [Also appears in ‘Sixty-two Years of Uncertainty: Historical, Philosophical, and Physical Inquiries into the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics’, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 17–31.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Beltrametti, E. G. and Cassinelli, G.: 1981, The Logic of Quantum Mechanics, Reading, Mass..

  • Berndl, K., Dürr, D., Goldstein, S., and Zanghì, N.: 1996, ‘EPR-Bell Nonlocality, Lorentz Invariance, and Bohmian Quantum Theory’, quant-ph/9510027, preprint. (To appear in Physical Review A, April 1996.)

  • BerndlK., DürrD., GoldsteinS., PeruzziG., and ZanghìN.: 1995, ‘On the Global Existence of Bohmian Mechanics’, Communications in Mathematical Physics 173, 647–673.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkhoff, G. and von Neumann, J.: 1936, ‘The logic of Quantum Mechanics’, Ann. Math. 37.

  • BohmD.: 1952, ‘A Suggested Interpretation of the Quantum Theory in Terms of ‘Hidden’ Variables, I and II,’ Physical Review 85, 166–193. Reprinted in Wheeler and Zurek 1983, pp. 369-396.

    Google Scholar 

  • BohmD. and HileyB. J.: 1993, The Undivided Universe: An Ontological Interpretation of Quantum Theory, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daumer, M., Dürr, D., Goldstein, S., and Zanghì, N.: 1996, ‘On the role of operators in quantum theory’, in preparation.

  • DaviesE. B.: 1976, Quantum Theory of Open Systems, Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Witt, B. S. and Graham, N. (eds.): 1973, The Many-Worlds interpretation of Quantum Mechanics, Princeton, N.J.

  • DieksD.: 1991, ‘On some alleged difficulties in interpretation of quantum mechanics’, Synthese 86, 77–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • DürrD., GoldsteinS., and ZanghìN.: 1992, ‘Quantum Equilibrium and the Origin of Absolute Uncertainty’, Journal of Statistical Physics 67, 843–907; “Quantum Mechanics, Randomness, and Deterministic Reality,’ Physics Letters A 172, 6–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dürr, D., Goldstein, S., and Zanghì, N.: 1996, ‘Bohmian Mechanics as the Foundation of Quantum Mechanics’, in Bohmian Mechanics and Quantum Theory: An Appraisal, J. Cushing, A. Fine and S. Goldstein (eds.), Kluwer Academic Press.

  • EverettH.: 1957, ‘Relative state formulation of quantum mechanics’, Review of Modern Physics 29, 454–462. Reprinted in De Witt et al. 1973, and Wheeler et al. 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gell-MannM. and HartleJ. B.: 1993, ‘Classical Equations for Quantum Systems’, Physical Review D 47, 3345–3382.

    Google Scholar 

  • GhirardiG. C., RiminiA., and WeberT.: 1986, ‘Unified Dynamics for Microscopic and Macroscopic Systems’, Physical Review D 34, 470–491.

    Google Scholar 

  • GhirardiG. C., PearleP., and RiminiA.: 1990, ‘Markov Processes in Hilbert Space and Continuous Spontaneous Localization of Systems of Identical Particles’, Physical Review A 42, 78–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • GhirardiG. C., GrassiR., and BenattiF.: 1995, ‘Describing the Macroscopic World: Closing the Circle within the Dynamical Reduction Program’, Foundations of Physics 23, 341–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • GleasonA. M.: 1957, ‘Measures on the Closed Subspaces of a Hilbert Space’, Journal of Mathematics and Mechanics 6, 885–893.

    Google Scholar 

  • GriffithsR. B: 1984, ‘Consistent Histories and the Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics’ Journal of Statistical Physics 36, 219–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • GoldsteinS.: 1987, ‘Stochastic Mechanics and Quantum Theory’, Journal of Statistical Physics 47, 645–667.

    Google Scholar 

  • JauchJ. M. and PironC.: 1963, ‘Can Hidden Variables be Excluded in Quantum Mechanics?’, Helvetica Phisica Acta 36, 827–837.

    Google Scholar 

  • JauchJ. M.: 1968, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • HollandP. R.: 1993, The Quantum Theory of Motion, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • KochenS. and SpeckerE. P.: 1967, ‘The Problem of Hidden Variables in Quantum Mechanics’, Journal of Mathematics and Mechanics 17, 59–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kochen, S.: ‘A New Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics’, in P. Lathi and P. Mittelstaedt (eds.), Symposium on the Foundations of Modern Physics, World Scientific, Singapore.

  • MottN. F.: 1929, Proceedings of the Royal Society A 124, 440.

    Google Scholar 

  • NelsonE.: 1966, ‘Derivation of the Schrödinger Equation from Newtonian Mechanics’, Physical Review 150, 1079–1085.

    Google Scholar 

  • NelsonE.: 1985 Quantum Fluctuations, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • OmnèsR.: 1988, ‘Logical Reformulation of Quantum Mechanics I’, Journal of Statistical Physics 53, 893–932.

    Google Scholar 

  • vonNeumannJ.: 1932, Mathematische Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik Springer Verlag, Berlin. English translation: 1955, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • SchrödingerE.: 1935, ‘Die gegenwärtige Situation in der Quantenmechanik,’ Die Naturwissenschaften 23, 807–812, 824–828, 844–849. [Also appears in translation as “The Present Situation in Quantum Mechanics,” in Wheeler and Zurek 1983, pp. 152–167.]

    Google Scholar 

  • vanFraassenB.: 1991, Quantum Mechanics, an Empiricist View, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • WheelerJ. A. and ZurekW. H. (eds.): 1983, Quantum Theory and Measurement, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Daumer, M., Dürr, D., Goldstein, S. et al. Naive realism about operators. Erkenntnis 45, 379–397 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00276801

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00276801

Keywords

Navigation