Skip to main content
Log in

Propagation of Indian Rhubarh (Rheum emodi Wall.) using shoot-tip and leaf explant culture

  • Published:
Plant Cell Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Shoot-tip explants of Rheum emodi Wall. (Polygonaceae) gave rise to multiple shoots when cultured on a Murashige and Skoog (1962) medium (MS) with 2.0 mg/l 6-benzylaminopurine (BAP) and 1.0 mg/l indole-3-butyric acid (IBA). Also, shoot buds developed from leaf explants using MS medium with 2.0 mg/l BAP and 0.25 to 1.0 mg/l indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) or IBA. Roots were induced when the resulting shoots were placed on MS medium with 1.0 mg/l IBA. Both regeneration procedures gave rise to healthy plantlets that were established in soil under glasshouse conditions at 80% frequency after hardening phase of two weeks. Regenerated plants showed a constant chromosome number of 2n=2x=22, same as the parent plant. The use of liquid shake cultures minimized the time and culture medium requirements for propagation. This procedure can be applied for the conservation and utilization of elite clones of R. emodi.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

BAP:

6-benzylaminopurine

Dd H2O:

Double glass distilled water

IAA:

indole-3-acetic acid

IBA:

indole-3-butyric acid

K:

Kinetin

MS:

Murashige and Skoog's (1962) medium

RH:

Relative humidity

References

  • Anonymous (1972) The Wealth of India, Vol.IX, Chadha YR (ed.) Press and Information Directorate, CSIR, New Delhi, pp. 3–6.

  • Biondi S, Thorpe TA (1981) In: Thorpe TA (ed.) Plant Tissue Culture: Methods and applications in Agriculture, Academic Press, New York, pp.1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohanec B (1985) Fagopyrums: 13–15.

  • Chopra RN, Chopra IC, Handa KL, Kapur LD (1958) Chopra's Indigenous Drugs of India (2nd edn.) UN Dhar and Sons Pvt. Ltd., Calcutta, pp. 233–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghouse M (1935) J Ind Inst Sci. IBA: 134–135.

  • Ghouse M, Katti MCT (1933) J Ind Inst Sci 16A: 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoagland DR, Arnon D (1950) Calif Agric Stn Circ 347.

  • Levine R, Gaba V, Hirsh S, Denola D, Vasil IK (1988) Bio/Technology 6: 1035–1040.

    Google Scholar 

  • Majumdar N, De NK (1938) Ind J Med Res 25: 671–675.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) Physiol Plant 15: 473–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okabe HK, Matsoo K, Nishioka I (1973) Chem Pharm Bull 21: 1254–1260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roggemans J, Claes MC (1979) Sci Hortic 11: 241–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah NC (1983) In: Jain SK and Rao RR (ed.) An assessment of Threatened Plants of India, BSI, Howrah, pp. 40–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srejovic V, Nescovic M (1981) Z Pflanzenphysiol 104: 37–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walkey DGA (1968) J Hort Sci 43: 283–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walkey DGA, Mathews KA (1979) Plant Sci Lett 14: 287–290.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by J. M. Widholm

CIMAP Publication No. 876

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lal, N., Ahuja, P.S. Propagation of Indian Rhubarh (Rheum emodi Wall.) using shoot-tip and leaf explant culture. Plant Cell Reports 8, 493–496 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00269057

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00269057

Keywords

Navigation