Skip to main content
Log in

Scalp distribution of visual evoked potentials to foveal pattern and luminance stimuli

  • Published:
Documenta Ophthalmologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Scalp potentials elicited by pattern reversal, pattern onset, and flash stimulation have been studied in normal subjects by means of a 16-channel brain mapping system. In two groups of experiments the topography of the major positive component in each response was compared with 4° full- and lateral half-field stimuli and, for more detailed exploration of the pattern components by M-scaled stimuli selected to activate 1 cm2-patches of striate cortex and associated extrastriate re-projections. The 4° stimuli were found to elicit scalp distributions for the pattern reversal P100 and the pattern onset C1 consistent with striate and extrastriate visual cortical origins respectively. Data on the flash P2 component suggest that stimulation was not localized accurately; this may have been due to lateral spread of neural activity in the retina. Predictably, the M-scaled stimuli showed extensive inter- and intra-individual variations depending on stimulus type and location relative to fixation. The manner in which, in some subjects, the region of maximal activity on the map appears to migrate with change of stimulus position possibly reflects local retinotopic order in visual evoked potential generator areas. However, data are neither extensive nor detailed enough to be conclusive.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barret G, Blumhardt L, Halliday AM, Halliday E, Kriss A. A paradox in the lateralisation of the visual evoked response. Nature 1976; 261: 253–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boynton RM. Stray light and the human electroretinogram. J Opt Soc Am 1953; 43: 442–449.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeVoe RG, Ripps H, Vaughan HG Jr. Cortical responses to stimulation of the human fovea. Vision Res 1968; 8: 135–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ditchburn RW, Foley Fisher IA. Assembled data on eye movements. Optica Acta 1967; 14: 113–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drasdo N. The neural representation of visual space. Nature 1977; 266: 554–556.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drasdo N. Cortical potentials evoked by pattern presentation in the foveal region. In: Barber C, ed. Evoked potentials. Lancaster: MTP Press, 1980; 167–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drasdo N. Optical techniques for enhancing the specificity of visual evoked potentials. Doc Ophthalmol Proc Ser 1982; 31: 327–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drasdo N. Electrophysiology of the human visual system. Ophthalmol Phys Opt 1983; 3: 321–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drasdo N. The effect of perimetric stimulation on evoked potential distribution - a theoretical model. Ophthalmol Physiol Opt (in press).

  • Halliday AM. The visual evoked potential in healthy subjects. In: Halliday AM, ed. Evoked potentials in clinical testing. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1982; 71–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday AM, Michael WF. Changes in pattern-evoked responses in man associated with the vertical and horizontal meridians of the visual field. J Physiol 1970; 208: 499–513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding GFA. The visual evoked response. Adv Ophthalmol 1974; 28: 2–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding GFA, Smith GF, Smith PA. The effect of various stimulation parameters on the lateralisation of the VEP. In: Barber C, ed. Evoked potentials. Lancaster: MTP Press, 1980; 213–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holder GE. Abnormalities of the pattern visual evoked potential in patients with homonymous visual field defects. In; Barber C, ed. Evoked potentials. Lancaster: MTP Press, 1980; 285–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffreys DA, Axford JG. Source locations of pattern-specific components of human visual evoked potentials. 1. Component of striate cortical origin. Exp Brain Res 1972; 16: 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesevre N, Joseph JP. Modifications of the pattern-evoked potential (PEP) in relation to the stimulated part of the visual field. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1979; 47: 183–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robson JG. Neurophysiology of retinal ganglion cells and optic nerve. In: Hess RF, Plant GT, eds. Optic neuritis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986; 19–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone J, Johnston E. The topography of primate retina; A study of the human, bushbaby and New- and Old-world monkeys. J Comp Neurol 1981; 196: 205–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vos JJ, Walraven J, van Meeteren A. Light profiles of the foveal image of a point source. Vision Res 1976; 16: 215–219.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Edwards, L., Drasdo, N. Scalp distribution of visual evoked potentials to foveal pattern and luminance stimuli. Doc Ophthalmol 66, 301–311 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00213658

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00213658

Key words

Navigation