Skip to main content
Log in

Peripheral cholangiocarcinoma: comparison of MRI with CT

  • Published:
Abdominal Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To evaluate the clinical utility of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the diagnosis of peripheral cholangiocarcinoma of the liver, 11 patients with pathologically proven peripheral cholangiocarcinoma were examined with both CT and MRI. On CT scans in 10 cases, the tumors appeared as irregular, low-attenuation masses with a wide variation in heterogeneity. Contrast enhancement of the tumors was mild in nine cases and moderate in one case, at the periphery. Tumor was not identified in one case. On T1-weighted MRIs, the tumors showed low intensity in eight cases and isointensity in three cases. On T2-weighted images, the tumors showed high intensity in all 11 cases. Focal dilatation of the intrahepatic bile ducts around the tumor was seen in one case on MRIs and in four cases on CT scans. Portal vein invasion of the tumors was seen in one case, and lymphadenopathy was seen in four cases on both MRIs and CT scans. MRI was slightly superior to CT in detecting the tumors, was inferior to CT in delineating focal ductal dilatation around the tumors, and was equal to CT in assessing extent of the tumors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Choi BI, Park JH, Kim YI, et al. Peripheral cholangiocarcinoma and clonorchiasis: CT findings. Radiology 1988;169:149–153

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ros PR, Buck JL, Goodman ID, Ros AMV, Olmsted WW. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiology 1988;167:689–693

    Google Scholar 

  3. Itai Y, Araki T, Furui S, Yashiro N, Ohtomo K, Iio M. Computed tomography of primary intrahepatic biliary malignancy. Radiology 1983;147:485–490

    Google Scholar 

  4. Yamashita Y, Takahashi M, Kanazawa S, Charnsangavej C, Wallace S. Parenchymal changes of the liver in cholangiocarcinoma: CT evaluation. Gastrointest Radiol 1992;17:161–166

    Google Scholar 

  5. Nesbit GM, Johnson CD, James EM, Macclarty RL, Nargorney DM, Bender CE. Cholangiocarcinoma: diagnosis and evaluation of resectability by CT and sonography as procedures complementary to cholangiography. AJR 1988;151:933–938

    Google Scholar 

  6. Honda H, Onitsuka H, Yasumori K, et al. Peripheral cholangio-carcinoma: two-phased dynamic incremental CT and pathologic correlation. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1993;17:397–402

    Google Scholar 

  7. Tani K, Kubota Y, Yamaguchi T, et al. MR imaging of peripheral cholangiocarcinoma. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1991;15:975–978

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hamrick-Turner J, Abbitt PL, Ros PR. Intrahepatic cholangio-carcinoma: MR appearance. AJR 1992;158:77–79

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fan ZM, Yamashita Y, Harada M, et al. Intrahepatic cholangio-carcinoma: spin-echo and contrast-enhanced dynamic MR imaging. AJR 1993;161:313–317

    Google Scholar 

  10. Yoshikawa J, Matsui O, Kadoya Y, Gabata T, Arai K, Takashima. Delayed enhancement of fibrotic areas in hepatic masses: CT pathologic correlation. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1992;16:206–211

    Google Scholar 

  11. Yamashita Y, Fan ZM, Yamamoto H, et al. Sclerosing hepatocellular carcinoma: radiologic finding. Abdom Imaging 1993;18:347–351

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This work was supported in part by the MR Research Fund of the Korean Radiological Research Foundation. We thank Sung Min Hong for preparing the manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Choi, B.I., Han, J.K., Shin, Y.M. et al. Peripheral cholangiocarcinoma: comparison of MRI with CT. Abdom Imaging 20, 357–360 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00203371

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00203371

Key words

Navigation