Skip to main content
Log in

Low frequency hearing in cephalopods

  • Published:
Journal of Comparative Physiology A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Classical conditioning was employed to test the sensitivity of cephalopods to vibrations between 1 and 100 Hz generated in a standing wave acoustic tube. The animals were trained to associate sound stimuli with a weak electric shock, and the recorded conditioned responses were changes in breathing and jetting activity. Five specimens of Sepia officinalis were tested, and all responded to these low frequency sounds. The relevant stimulus parameter was particle motion rather than sound pressure. The threshold values (measured as particle acceleration) decreased towards lower frequencies in the tested range, reaching values below 4 × 10-3 m/s2. The thresholds in the most sensitive range may have been masked by the considerable background noise at the experimental site (Naples). Two individuals of Octopus vulgaris and one Loligo vulgaris were also tested, and showed a similar sensitivity to low frequency sound.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arnold JM, Williams-Arnold LD (1980) Development of the ciliature pattern on the embryo of the squid Loligo pealei: a scanning electron microscope study. Biol Bull 159:102–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Budelmann B-U (1970) Die Arbeitsweise der Statolithenorgane von Octopus vulgaris. Z Vergl Physiol 70:278–312

    Google Scholar 

  • Budelmann B-U (1976) Equilibrium receptor systems in molluscs. In: Mill PJ (ed) Structure and function of proprioceptors in the invertebrates. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 529–566

    Google Scholar 

  • Budelmann B-U (1979) Hair cell polarization in the gravity receptor systems of the statocysts of the cephalopods Sepia officinalis and Loligo vulgaris. Brain Res 160:261–270

    Google Scholar 

  • Budelmann B-U, Bleckmann H (1988) A lateral line analogue in cephalopods: water waves generate microphonic potentials in the epidermal head lines of Sepia and Lolliguncula. J Comp Physiol A 164:1–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Budelmann B-U, Wolff HG (1973) Gravity response from angular acceleration receptors in Octopus vulgaris. J Comp Physiol 85:283–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman CJ, Hawkins AD (1973) A field study of hearing in the cod, Gadus morhua L. J Comp Physiol 85:147–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Corner BD, Moore HT (1980) Field observations on the reproductive behavior of Sepia latimanus. Micronesica 16:235–260

    Google Scholar 

  • Dijkgraaf S (1963) Versuche über Schallwahrnehmung bei Tintenfischen. Naturwissenschaften 50:50

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon WJ (1965) The up-and-down method for small samples. J Am Statist Ass 60:967–978

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanlon RT, Budelmann B-U (1987) Why cephalopods are probably not “deaf”. Am Nat 129:312–317

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanlon RT, Hixon RF, Hulet WH (1983) Survival, growth, and behavior of the loliginid squids Loligo plei, Loligo pealei, and Lolliguncula brevis (Mollusca: Cephalopoda) in closed sea water systems. Biol Bull 165:637–685

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins AD, MacLennan DN (1976) An acoustic tank for hearing studies in fish. In: Schuijf A, Hawkins AD (eds) Sound reception in fish. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 149–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard SJ (1960) Hearing and the octopus statocyst. J Exp Biol 37:845–853

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulet WH (1982) Commentary on the international symposium on functional morphology of cephalopods. Malacologia 23:203–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Moynihan M (1985) Why are cephalopods deaf? Am Nat 125:465–469

    Google Scholar 

  • Moynihan M, Rodaniche AF (1982) The behavior and natural history of the Caribbean reef squid Sepioteuthis sepioidea. Advances in ethology 25. Paul Parey, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris KS, Møhl B (1983) Can odontocetes debilitate prey with sound? Am Nat 122:85–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Packard A, Trueman ER (1974) Muscular activity of the mantle of Sepia and Loligo (Cephalopoda) during respiratory movements and jetting, and its physiological interpretation. J Exp Biol 61:411–419

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid ML, Eckert CG, Muma KE (1986) Booming odontocetes and deaf cephalopods: putting the cart before the horse. Am Nat 128:438–439

    Google Scholar 

  • Sand O (1981) The lateral-line and sound reception. In: Tavolga WN, Popper AN, Fay RR (eds) Hearing and sound communication in fishes. Springer, New York, pp 459–480

    Google Scholar 

  • Sand O (1984) Lateral-line systems. In: Bolis L, Keynes RD, Maddrell SHP (eds) Comparative physiology of sensory systems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 3–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Sand O, Karlsen HE (1986) Detection of infrasound by the atlantic cod. J Exp Biol 125:197–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephens PR, Young JZ (1982) The statocyst of the squid Loligo. J Zool Lond 197:241–266

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundermann G (1983) The fine structure of epidermal lines on arms and head of postembryonic Sepia officinalis and Loligo vulgaris (Mollusca, Cephalopoda). Cell Tissue Res 232:669–677

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundermann-Meister G (1978) Ein neuer Typ von Cilienzellen in der Haut von spätembryonalen und juvenilen Loligo vulgaris (Mollusca, Cephalopoda). Zool Jahrb Abt Anat Ontog Tiere 99:493–499

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor MA (1986) Stunning whales and deaf squids. Nature 323:298–299

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells MJ (1978) Octopus: physiology and behaviour of an advanced invertebrate. Chapman and Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells MJ, Wells J (1956) Tactile discrimination and the behavior of blind Octopus. Pubbl Stn Zool Napoli 28:94–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson R (1988) Vibration sensitivity in the statocyst of the northern octopus. Eledone cirrosa. J Exp Biol 134:451–454

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson R, Budelmann B-U (1985) The response of the Octopus angular acceleration receptor system to sinusoidal stimulation. J Comp Physiol A 156:403–412

    Google Scholar 

  • Young JZ (1960) The statocysts of Octopus vulgaris. Proc R Soc Lond B 152:3–29

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Packard, A., Karlsen, H.E. & Sand, O. Low frequency hearing in cephalopods. J Comp Physiol A 166, 501–505 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00192020

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00192020

Key words

Navigation