Skip to main content
Log in

Contributions of taste factors and gender to opioid preference in C57BL and DBA mice

  • Original Investigations
  • Published:
Psychopharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

C57BL/6J and DBA/2J mouse strains have been characterized as morphine preferrers and avoiders, respectively (Horowitz et al. 1977). Previously, sweetened morphine solutions were presented with a water alternative, primarily with male subjects. Because sweetness may affect the endogenous opioid system and rodents have shown strain and sex differences in taste preferences, this study looked for strain- and gender-related taste preferences that might have affected opiate consumption. Preference for sweetened and unsweetened morphine and etonitazene was compared across gender and strain. In all choice tests, the control was a similar tasting quinine sulphate solution. Under these conditions, C57BL/6J mice continued to show strong preference for morphine. However, DBA/2J mice drank approximately equal amounts of morphine and quinine solutions, rather than avoiding morphine as when water was the alternative. Both strains appeared surprisingly indifferent to the synthetic opioid etonitazene, compared because it is potent at concentrations having barely perceptible bitterness. This raises the possibility of unexpected differences in post-ingestional effects between morphine and etonitazene. Contrary to reports of gender differences in sweet preference in rats, none were found in either strain of mouse. Neither were there any significant sex differences in opiate preference in either strain. C57 mice preferred sweetness more than did DBA mice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander BK, Beyerstein BL, Hadaway PF, Coambs RB (1981) Effect of early and later colony housing or oral ingestion of morphine in rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 15:571–576

    Google Scholar 

  • Baran A, Shuster L, Eleftheriou BE, Bailey DW (1975) Opiate receptors in mice: Genetic differences. Life Sci 17(4):633–640

    Google Scholar 

  • Castellano C, Llovera BE, Oliverio A (1975) Morphine-induced running and analgesia in two strains of mice following septal lesions or modification of brain amines. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch Pharmacol 288:355–370

    Google Scholar 

  • Chernov HI, Ambrose FG, Plummer AJ (1968) Pattern of consumption of etonitazene solutions by naive rats. Arch Int Pharmacodyn 175(2):309–318

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper SJ (1983) Effects of opiate agonists and antagonists on fluid intake and saccharin choice in the rat. Neuropharmacology 22(3A):323–328

    Google Scholar 

  • Dykstra LA, Wharton W, McMillan DE (1977) Antagonism of etonitazene's effects in rats and pigeons. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 6:215–219

    Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson K, Kiianmaa K (1971) Genetic analysis of susceptibility to morphine addiction in inbred mice. Ann Med Exp Fenn 49:73–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadaway PF, Alexander BK, Coambs RB, Beyerstein BL (1979) The effect of housing and gender on preference for morphine-sucrose solution in rats. Psychopharmacology 66:87–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Horowitz G (1976) Morphine self administration by inbred mice: A preliminary report. Behav Genet 6:109–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Horowitz GP, Whitney G, Smith JC, Stephan FK (1977) Morphine ingestion: Genetic control in mice. Psychopharmacology 52:119–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Howell DC (1982) Statistical methods for psychology. Duxbury Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein TW, DeFries JC (1970) Similar polymorphism of taste sensitivitiy to PTC in mice and men. Nature 225:555–557

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieblich I, Cohen E, Ganchrow JR, Blass EM, Bermann F (1983) Morphine tolerance in genetically selected rats induced by chronically elevated saccharine intake. Science 221:871–872

    Google Scholar 

  • McMillan DE, Leander JD, Wilson TW, Wallace SC, Fix T, Redding S, Turk RT (1976) Oral ingestion of narcotic analgesics by rats. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 196(2):269–279

    Google Scholar 

  • Meisch RA, Stark LJ (1977) Establishment of etonitazene as a reinforcer for rats by use of schedule-induced drinking. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 7:195–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols JR, Hsiao S (1967) Addiction liability of albino rats: Breeding for quantitative differences in morphine drinking. Science 157:561–563

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliverio A, Castellano C, Eleftheriou BE (1975) Morphine sensitivity and tolerance: A genetic investigation in the mouse. Psychopharmacologia 42:219–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosow CE, Miller JM, Pelikan EW, Cochin J (1980) Opiates and thermal regulation in mice. 1. Agonists. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 213(2):273–283

    Google Scholar 

  • Synder SH, Childers SR (1979) Opiate receptors and opioid peptides. Annu Rev Neurosci 2:35–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Valenstein ES, Kakolewski JW, Cox VC (1967) Sex differences in taste preference for glucose and saccharin solutions. Science 156:942–943

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitney G, Horowitz GP (1978) Morphine preference of alcohol-avoiding and alcohol-preferring C57BL mice. Behav Genet 8(2):177–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Zellner DA, Berridge KC, Grill HJ, Ternes JW (1985) Rats learn to like the taste of morphine. Behav Neurosci 99(2):290–300

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Forgie, M.L., Beyerstein, B.L. & Alexander, B.K. Contributions of taste factors and gender to opioid preference in C57BL and DBA mice. Psychopharmacology 95, 237–244 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00174516

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00174516

Key words

Navigation