Abstract
The relationship between model modification and predictive validity in covariance structure models is studied. It is shown that a function of the modification index (MI) (Joreskog and Sorbom, 1986; Sorbom, 1989) is asymptotically equivalent to changes in the predictive validity of the model as measured by Akaike's (1973; 1987) information criterion (AIC). Given this equivalency, it is argued that competing models should be modified independently in substantively plausible directions. The choice among the modified competing models should be made via the AIC. However, given the unreliable nature of the modification index as a specification error search tool, it is argued that a combination of the MI and expected parameter change methodology advocated by Saris, Satorra, and Sorbom (1987) and Kaplan (1990a, 1990b) may be more useful for guiding specification error searches. Implications for modeling practice are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akaike, H. (1973). “Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle”, in B.N. Petrov and F. Csake (eds.), Second International Symposium on Information Theory, Budapest Akademiai Kiado, 267–281.
AkaikeH. (1985). “Prediction and entropy”, in A.C.Atkinson and S.E.Fienberg (eds.), A Celebration of Statistics (pp. 1–24). New York: Springer-Verlag.
AkaikeH. (1987). “Factor analysis and AIC”, Psychometrika 53: 317–332.
BozdoganH. (1987). “Model selection and Akaike's information criterion (AIC): The general theory and its analytical extensions”, Psychometrika 53: 345–370.
BrowneM.W. and CudeckR. (1989). “Single sample cross-validation indices for covariance structures”, Multivariate Behavioral Research 24: 445–455.
CudeckR. and BrowneM.W. (1983). “Cross-validation of covariance structures”, Multivariate Behavioral Research 18: 147–167.
GraybillF.A. (1983). Matrices with Applications in Statistics. Belmont: Wadsworth Press.
JoreskogK.G. (1978). “Structural analysis of covariance and correlation matrices”, Psychometrika 43: 443–477.
JoreskogK.G. and SorbomD. (1986). LISREL-VI: Analysis of Linear Structural Relationships by the Method of Maximum Likelihood. Mooresville: Scientific Software, Inc.
KaplanD. (1988). “The impact of specification error on the estimation, testing, and improvement of structural equation models”, Multivariate Behavioral Research 23: 69–86.
KaplanD. (1989). “Modification of structural equation models: Application of the expected parameter change statistic”, Multivariate Behavioral Research 24: 285–305.
KaplanD. (1990a). “Evaluating and modifying covariance structure models: A review and recommendation”. Multivariate Behavioral Research 25: 137–155.
KaplanD. (1990b). “A rejoinder on evaluating and modifying covariance structure models”, Multivariate Behavioral Research 25: 197–204.
Luijben, T., Boomsma, A., and Molenaar, I.W. (1987). “Modification of factor analysis models in covariance structure analysis: A Monte Carlo study”, Heymans Bulletins Psychologische Instituten. University of Groningen.
MacCallumR. (1986). “Specification searches in covariance structure modeling”, Psychological Bulletin 100: 107–120.
SarisW.E., SatorraA., and SorbomD. (1987). “The detection and correction of specification errors in structural equation models”, in C.C.Clogg (ed.), Sociological Methodology. 1987, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
SatorraA. (1989). “Alternative test criteria in covariance structure analysis: A unified approach”, Psychometrika 54: 131–151.
SatorraA. and SarisW.E. (1985). “Power of the likelihood ratio test in covariance structure analysis”, Psychometrika 50: 83–90.
SorbomD. (1989). “Model modification”, Psychometrika 54: 371–384.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kaplan, D. On the modification and predictive validity of covariance structure models. Qual Quant 25, 307–314 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00167535
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00167535