Skip to main content
Log in

The importance of fixation procedures on DNA template and its suitability for solution-phase polymerase chain reaction and PCR in situ hybridization

  • Papers
  • Published:
The Histochemical Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Conventional solution-phase polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and in situ PCR/PCR in situ hybridization are powerful tools for retrospective analysis of fixed paraffin wax-embedded material. Amplification failure using these techniques is now encountered in some centres using archival fixed tissues. Such ◂ailures’ may not only be due to absent target DNA sequences in the tissues, but may be a direct effect of the type of fixative, fixation time and/or fixation temperature used. The type of nucleic acid extraction procedure applied will also influence amplification results. This is particularly true with in situ PCR/PCR in situ hybridization.

To examine these effects in solution-phase PCR, β-globin gene was amplified in 100 mg pieces of tonsillar tissue fixed in Formal saline, 10% formalin, neutral buffered formaldehyde, Carnoy's, Bouin's, buffered formaldehyde sublimate, Zenker's, Helly's and glutaraldehyde at 0 to 4°C, room temperature and 37°C fixation temperatures and for fixation periods of 6, 24, 48 and 72 hours and 1 week. DNA extraction procedures used were simple boiling and 5 days' proteinase K digestion at 37°C. Amplified product was visible primarily yet variably from tissue fixed in neutral buffered formaldehyde and Carnoy's, whereas fixation in mercuric chloride-based fixatives produced consistently negative results. Room temperature and 37°C fixation temperature appeared most conducive to yielding amplifiable DNA template. Fixation times of 24 and 48 hours in neutral buffered formaldehyde and Carnoy's again favoured amplification.

Fixed SiHa cells (containing 1–2 copies of HPV 16) were examined using PCR in situ hybridization for the amplification of HPV 16. Discrete and diffuse amplification signals were obtained. Neutral buffered formaldehyde fixation for 12–24 hours yielded amplifiable material suitable for use with PCR in situ hybridization. Overall amplification success within cellular preparations was 40%, with non-specific background staining also seen. Possible technical problems encountered with PCR in situ hybridization are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • An, S. F. & Fleming, K. A. (1991) Removal of inhibitor(s) of the polymerase chain reaction from formalin fixed, paraffin wax embedded tissues. J. Clin. Pathol. 44, 924–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton Rogers, B., Alpert, L. C., Hine, E. A. S. & Buffone, G. J. (1990) Analysis of DNA in fresh and fixed tissue by the polymerase chain reaction. Am. J. Pathol. 136, 541–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Battifora, H. & Kopinski, M. (1986) The influence of proteinase digestion and duration of fixation on the immunostaining of keratins. A comparison of formalin and ethanol fixation. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 34, 1095.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, C. T. & O'Leary, J. J. (1992) The search for the universal fixative or ‘magic juice’. J. Pathol. 166, 331–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubeau, L., Chandler, L. A., Gralow, J. R., Nichols, P. W. & Jones, P. A. (1986) Southern blot analysis of DNA extracted from formalin fixed pathology specimens. Cancer Res. 46, 2964–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goelz, S. E., Hamilton, S. R. & Vogelstein, B. (1985) Purification of DNA from formaldehyde fixed and paraffin embedded human tissue. Biochem. Biol. Res. Commun. 130, 118–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greer, C. E., Patterson, S. L., Kiviat, N. B. & Manos, M. (1991) PCR amplification from paraffin embedded tissues; effects of fixative and fixation time. Am. Clin. Pathol. 95, 117–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopwood, D. (1972) Theoretical and practical aspects of glutaraldehyde fixation. Histochem. J. 4, 267–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopwood, D. (1985) Cell and tissue fixation, 1972–1982. Histochem. J. 17, 389–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, D. P., Lewis, F. A., Taylor, G. R., Boylston, A. W. & Quirke, P. (1990) Tissue extraction of DNA and RNA and analysis by the polymerase chain reaction. J. Clin. Pathol. 43, 499–504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lench, N., Stanier, P. & Williamson, R. (1988) Simple noninvasive method to obtain DNA for gene analysis. Lancet ii, 1356–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, F. A., Griffiths, S., Dunnicliff, R., WellsM., Dudding, N. & BirdC. C. (1987) Sensitive in-situ hybridisation technique using biotin-streptavidin polyalkaline phosphatase complex. J. Clin. Pathol. 40, 163–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mcghee, J. D. & VonHippel, P. H. (1975a) Formaldehyde as a probe of DNA structure 1. Reaction with exocyclic amino groups of DNA bases. Biochemistry 14, 1281–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mcghee, J. D. & VonHippel, P. H. (1975b) Formaldehyde as a probe of DNA structure 2. Reaction with endocyclic imino groups of DNA bases. Biochemistry 14, 1297–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mcghee, J. D. & VonHippel, P. H. (1976a) Formaldehyde as a probe of DNA structure 3. Mechanism of the initial reaction of formaldehyde with DNA. Biochemistry 16, 3267–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mcghee, J. D. & VonHippel, P. H. (1976b) Formaldehyde as a probe of DNA structure 4. Equilibrium denaturation of DNA and synthetic polynucleotides. Biochemistry 16, 3276–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuovo, G. J., Gallery, F., Macconnell, P., Becker, P. & Bloch, W. (1991) An improved technique for the detection of DNA by in-situ hybridisation after PCR amplification. Am. J. Pathol. 139, 1239–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuovo, G. J. (1992) PCR in situ hybridization. Protocols and Applications. New York: Raven Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuovo, G. J., Gallery, F., Hom, R., Macconnell, P. & Bloch, W. (1993) Importance of different variables for enhancing in-situ detection of PCR amplified DNA. PCR Meth. App. 305–12.

  • O'Leary, J. J., Browne, G., Bashir, M. S., Crowley, M., HEALY, I., Lewis, F. A. & Doyle, C. T. (1994) Non-Isotopic Detection of DNA in tissues. Practical approach series. Oxford: Oxford University Press (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Saiki, R. H., Scharf, S., Faloona, F., Mullis, K. B., Horn, G. T., Erlich, H. A., & Arnheim, N. (1985) Enzymatic amplification of β-globin genetic sequence and restriction site analysis for diagnosis of sickle cell anaemia. Science 230, 1350–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shibata, D., Forrester, K., Martin, J., Arnheim, N. & PeruchoM. (1988) Most human carcinomas of exocrine pancreas contain mutant K-ras genes. Cell 53, 549.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheibani, K., Wu, A., Ben-Ezra, J. & Battifora, H. (1989) Analysis of Ha-Ras sequence in DNA's of malignant mesothelioma and pulmonary adenocarcinoma by a sensitive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method. Lab. Invest. 60, 87A.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

O'Leary, J.J., Browne, G., Landers, R.J. et al. The importance of fixation procedures on DNA template and its suitability for solution-phase polymerase chain reaction and PCR in situ hybridization. Histochem J 26, 337–346 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00157767

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00157767

Keywords

Navigation