Skip to main content
Log in

Transforming adversaries into collaborators

Interest groups and the regulation of chemical pesticides

  • Published:
Policy Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

After more than a decade of sharp conflict, environmental and chemical industry lobbyists sat down in direct, private negotiations on reforming pesticides regulatory policy in the United States. This article examines the dynamics that transformed longtime adversaries into temporary collaborators during 1985–86. It also examines why the efforts of this ad hoc coalition eventually failed. In doing so, this case looks into the current state of relations among American interest groups, and between the interest group community and the Congress.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Berry, Jeffrey M. (1988). ‘Subgovernments, Issue Networks, and Political Conflict’, in: Richard A. Harris and Sidney Milkis (eds), Remaking American Politics. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosso, Christopher J. (1987). Pesticides and Politics: The Life Cycle of a Public Issue. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, Mary Etta and Roger H. Davidson (1984). ‘Deferral Politics: Congressional Decision-Making on Environmental Issues in the 1980s’, in: Helen M. Ingram and R. Kenneth Godwin (eds.), Public Policy and the Natural Environment. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Charles O. (1975). Clean Air: The Politics and Policies of Pollution Control. Pittsburgh:University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Charles O. (1979). ‘American Politics and the Organization of Energy Decision Making’, Annual Review of Energy 4: 99–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, Anthony, (ed.) (1978). The New American Political System. Washington: American Enterprise Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latham, Earl (1952). The Group Basis of Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loomis, Burdett (1986). ‘Coalitions of Interest: Building Bridges in the Balkanized State’, in: Allan J. Cigler and Burdett A. Loomis (eds.), Interest Group Politics, 2d ed. Washington: CQ Press, pp. 258–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFarland, Andrew S. (1986). ‘Groups without Government: The Politics of Mediation’, in: Allan J. Cigler and Burdett A. Loomis (eds.), Interest Group Politics, 2d ed., Washington: CQ Press, pp. 289–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFarland, Andrew S. (1987). ‘Sources of Countervailing Power in America: Contributions from Recent Interest Group Theory’, Paper delivered at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, IL.

  • Marcus, Alfred, (1980). Promise and Performance: Choosing and Implementing an Environmental Policy. Westport CT: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melnick, R. Shep (1983). Regulation and the Courts: The Case of the Clean Air Act. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raiffa, Howard (1982). The Art and Science of Negotiation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schattschneider, E. E. (1935). Politics, Pressures, and the Tariff. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schattschneider, E. E. (1960). The Semi-Sovereign People. Hinsdale, IL: The Dryden Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlozman, Kay Lehman and John T. Tierney (1986). Organized Interests and American Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoenbrod, David (1983). ‘Environmental Mediation: A Review Essay’, in: Stuart L. Duetsch (ed.), Land Use and Environmental Law Review, 1985. New York: Clark Boardman, pp.351–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanfield, Rochelle L. (1985). Politics Pushes Pesticide Manufacturers and Environmentalists Closer Together. National Journal, December 15: 2846–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanfield, Rochelle L. (1987). Legalized Poisons. National Journal, May 5: 1062–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Susskind, Laurence and Alan Weinstein (1983). ‘Towards a Theory of Environmental Dispute Resolution’, in: Stuart L. Duetsch (ed.), Land Use and Environmental Law Review, 1983. New York: Clark Boardman, pp. 433–79.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bosso, C.J. Transforming adversaries into collaborators. Policy Sci 21, 3–22 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00145119

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00145119

Keywords

Navigation