Skip to main content
Log in

Problems of variation and heredity in Russian biology in the late nineteenth century

  • Published:
Journal of the History of Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. See K. A. Timiryazev, Sochineniia [Works], vol. VI (Moscow, 1939), pp. 264–265.

  2. See A. E.Gaissinovitch, Zarozhdenie genetiki [Origins of Genetics] (Moscow: Isdatel'stvo Nauka, 1967), pp. 129–131; idem, “The Rise and Development of Mendelism,” [Russian] in A. E. Gaissinovitch, ed., Gregor Mendel', Sharl' Noden, Ogiusten Sazhre: Izbrannye raboty [Gregor Mendel, Charles Naudin, Augustin Sageret: Selected Works] (Moscow: Meditsina, 1968), pp. 49–50; and idem, “Clement A. Timiryazev and Mendelism,” Folia Mendeliana, Brno, 6 (1971), 305–310.

    Google Scholar 

  3. See H. F.Roberts, Plant Hybridization Before Mendel (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1929); C. Zirkle, The Beginnings of Plant Hybridization (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1935); A. E. Gaissinovitch, “Gregor Mendel and his Forerunners [Russian],” in Augustin Sageret, Charles Naudin, and Gregor Mendel, Izbrannye Raboty o Rastitel'nykh Gibridakh [Selected Papers on Plant Hybrids] (Moscow: Gos. Izd. Biol. i med. Lit., 1935), pp. 9–155; R. Olby, The Origins of Mendelism (London: Constable, 1966); H. Stubbe, Kurze Geschichte der Genetik bis zur Wiederentdeckung der Vererbungsregeln Gregor Mendels (2nd ed.; Jena: Fischer, 1965); and articles by Gaissinovitch in n. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  4. See A. E.Gaissinovitch, “The Beginning of Soviet Genetics. I. The Fight Against Lamarckism (1922–1927) [Russian],” Genetika, 4, no. 6 (1968), 158–175.

    Google Scholar 

  5. See, for example, I. A.Polyakov, “The Struggle of Russian Biologists against Mendelism [Russian],” Trudy Instituta Istorii Estestvoznaniia3 (1949), 3–27; P. A. Novikov, “The Struggle against Weismannism-Mendelism-Morganism in Russian Zoology [Russian],” ibid., 5 (1953), 93–144; B. E. Raikov, “V. I. Shmankevitch and his Works on the Effect Exerted by the Environment upon the Organism [Russian],” ibid., 5 (1953), 245–272; and the sections in Istoriia Estestvoznaniia v Rossii [History of Natural Science in Russia] (Moscow: Akademiia Nauk, 1962) vol. III, by S. L. Sobol (pp. 251–271) and P. A. Novikov (pp. 272–346).

    Google Scholar 

  6. For details see Gaissinovitch, “Gregor Mendel and his Forerunners,” pp. 127–129; and “The First Account of G. Mendel's Work in Russia (I. F. Schmalhausen, 1874) [Russian],” Byulleten' Moskovskogo obshchestva ispytatelei prirody (biol.), 70 (1965), 22–24; and Zarozhdenie genetiki, pp. 105–107.

  7. V. I.Shmankevitch, “Some Species of Crustacea of Saltlake and Fresh Waters and their Reaction to Environment [Russian],” Zapiski Novorossiiskago Obshchestva Estestvoispytatelei, 2 (1875), 1–391, especially 369–370.

    Google Scholar 

  8. V. I.Shmankevitch, “Über das Verhältniss der Artemia salina Milne Edw. zur Artemia Mühlhausenii und dem Genus Branchipus Scharff.,” Zeitschrift für wissenschaftliche Zoologie, 25 (1875), 109.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Shmankevitch, “Some Species of Crustacea,” p. 381.

  10. KarlSemper, Die Natürlichen Existenzbedingungen der Theire, 2 vols. (Leipzig: Brockhaus, 1980). Darwin read the book in English translation: Natural Conditions of Existence as They Affect Animal Life (London: International Science Series, 1881).

    Google Scholar 

  11. CharlesDarwin, More Letters, ed. FrancisDarwin and A. C.Seward (London: Murray, 1903), I, 391.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Alfed RusselWallace, Darwinism (London: Macmillan, 1889), p. 427.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Raikov, “Shmankevitch,” p. 264.

  14. AugustWeismann, Studien zur Descendenzlehre, 2 vols. (Leipzig: Englemann, 1875–76): vol. 1 was Uber den Saisondimorphismus der Schmetterlinge.

    Google Scholar 

  15. “Die Entwicklungsrichtung der Art wird eine andere. Die complicirten chemisch-physikalischen Vorgänge im Stoffwechsel der Puppenschlafs verschieden sich allmählich derart, dass daraus als End-Resultante eine neue Zeichnung und Färbung der Schmetterlings hervorgeht.” Ibid., I, 43.

  16. I. I.Metchnikov, “Investigations into Axolotl Transformations (1876)” [Russian] in his Akademicheskoe sobranie sochinenii [Collected Works] (Moscow: Gos. Izd. Med. Lit., 1955), III, 49.

    Google Scholar 

  17. N. S. Gaevskaya, “Variations in Artemia salina [Russian],” Trudy Osoboi Zoologicheskoi Laboratorii i Sebastopol'skoi Biologicheskoi Stantsii (Imperatorskoi) Akademii Nauk, ser. ii, no. 3.

  18. On this see Gaissinovitch, “Darwin's Views on Variation and Heredity [Russian],” Iz Istorii Biologii2 (1970), 33–59, especially pp. 36–37 and 51–52.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Timiryazev, Sochineniia, II (Moscow, 1937), 92.

    Google Scholar 

  20. See Gaissinovitch,“Darwin's Views,” p. 53.

  21. Timiryazev, Sochineniia, V (Moscow, 1938), 138.

    Google Scholar 

  22. See Gaissinovitch, “Timiryazev and Mendelism.”

  23. See Gaissinovitch, “The Great Russian Biologist I. I. Metchnikov [Russian],” in I. I. Metchnikov, Izbrannye sochinenii [Selected Works] (Moscow: Utchpedgiz, 1956), pp. 6–30; idem, “Elie Metchnikov et le Darwinisme,” Proceedings of the XVth International Congress of Zoology, London (1959), pp. 110–113; and idem, “I. I. Metchnikov, The Great Russian Biologist [Russian],” Zhurnal Obshchei Biologii, 31 (1970), 490–499.

    Google Scholar 

  24. I. I. Metchnikov, “Essays on the Problem of the Origin of Species (1876)” [Russian], in Akademicheskoe sobranie sochinenii, IV, 155–327; the quotation is from p. 182.

  25. I. I.Metchnikov, Nevospriimchivost V Infektsionnikh Bolieznyakh [The Non-Susceptibility of Infectious Diseases] (St. Petersburg: Rikker, 1903), p. 477.

    Google Scholar 

  26. I. I. Metchnikov, “Darwinism and Medicine (1910)” [Russian], in Akademicheskoe sobranie sochinenii, IV, 404.

  27. Ibid., IV. 405.

  28. I. I. Metchnikov, “Celebration in Darwin's Honor in Cambridge (1909)” [Russian], in Akademicheskoe sobranie sochinenii, IV, 400.

  29. I. I. Metchnikov, “Embryologische Studien an Medusen, (1886),” in Akademicheskoe sobranie sochinenii, III, 197.

  30. For details see Gaissinovitch, “Darwin's Views on Variation and Heredity [Russian],” Iz Istorii Biologii2 (1970), pp. 43–45.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Metchnikov, “Essay on the Problem of the Origin of Species (1876)” [Russian], in Akademicheskoe sobranie sochinenii, IV, 247.

  32. Ibid.

  33. Ibid.

  34. Ibid., IV, 248.

  35. Ibid., IV, 249.

  36. It is known that even before de Vries, the theory of “discontinuous” variation was substantiated by William Bateson (1894), and in 1899 S. I. Korzhinsky (1861–1900) suggested a theory of “heterogenesis” also based on saltatory hereditary variation. Unfortunately, this theory cannot be discussed in this paper.

  37. Metchnikov, “Celebration,” IV, 398.

  38. Ibid., IV, 399.

  39. P. F. Leshaft, “Heredity [Russian],” Russkoye Bogatstvo (1889), no. 9, pp. 33–80; no. 10, pp. 3–59; no. 11, pp. 98–132; and no. 12, pp. 39–83; quotation from no. 10, p. 15.

  40. Ibid.

  41. P. F.Leshaft, “Editorial [Russian],” [Proceedings of St. Petersburg Biological Laboratory], 1 (1896), 17.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Leshaft, “Heredity,” no. 10, p. 15.

  43. Ibid., no. 10, p. 42.

  44. Ibid., p. 43.

  45. Ibid., no. 12, p. 82.

  46. Ibid., no. 11, p. 120.

  47. P. F.Leshaft, “Editorial [Russian],” [Proceedings of St. Petersburg Biological Laboratory], 1 (1896), no. 10, pp. 43–48; no. 11, pp. 101–106; and no. 12, pp. 69–73.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Ibid., no. 7, p. 106.

  49. V. L.Komarov, Lamarck [Lamarck] (Leningrad: Gosizdat, 1925), p. 142.

    Google Scholar 

  50. See, for example, G. G. Shakhverdov, “P. F. Leshaft's Struggle agains Weismannism and his Teaching of Heredity, Environment, and Upbringing, in the Light of Mitchurin's Biology [Russian],” Sovetskaya pedagogika (1949), no. 4, pp. 44–55; and idem, P. F. Lesgaft, ocherk zhizni i nauchnopedagogichoskoi deiatol'nosti [p. F. Leshaft, A Survey of his Life and Scientific and Pedagogical Activities] (Leningrad: “Znanie”, 1950).

  51. V. G.Kas'ianenko, Petr Francevich Lesgaft (Kiev: Akademii nauk Ukrainskoi SSR, 1950), p. 51. [Italics mine-A.E.G.]

    Google Scholar 

  52. D. A.Zhdanov, “The Anatomical Investigations and World Outlook of P. F. Leshaft and their Significance for Modern Anatomy [Russian],” in P. F. Leshaft, Izbrannye trudy po anatomii [Selected Works on Anatomy] (Moscow: Meditsina, 1968), p. 16.

    Google Scholar 

  53. N. A. Kholodkovsky, “Heredity. Essays on Various Problems of General Zoology [Russian],” Russkoye Bogatstvo (1887), no. 7, pp. 39–55, and no. 8, pp. 3–19; quotation from no. 8, p. 14.

  54. Ibid., no. 8, p. 4.

  55. Ibid., no. 7, p. 50.

  56. Ibid., no. 8, p. 7.

  57. Ibid., p. 18.

  58. N. A.Kholodkovsky, “The Naegeli/Darwin Theory, Critics of the Theory and Its Further Development” (1888) [Russian], in N. A. Kholodkovsky, Biologicheskie ocherki [Biological Essays], E. N.Pavlovskii, ed., (Moscow: Gosizdat, 1923). The quotation is from p. 113.

    Google Scholar 

  59. M. A. Menzbier, “The Progress of Biology [Russian],” Russkaya Mysl' (1888), no. 5, pp. 184–210; quotation from p. 201.

  60. Ibid., p. 199.

  61. M. A. Menzbier, “The Present Tasks of Biology [Russian],” Russkaya Mysl' (1891), no. 9, pp. 170–191; no. 10, pp. 182–201; and no. 12, pp. 278–198; quotation from no. 9, p. 179.

  62. Ibid., no. 9, p. 188.

  63. M. A. Menzbier, “Experience of the Theory of Heredity [Russian],” Russkaya Mysl' (1893), no. 10, pp. 208–231; quotation from pp. 214–215.

  64. Ibid., p. 217.

  65. Ibid., p. 219.

  66. Ibid., p. 227.

  67. Ibid., p. 230.

  68. Novikov, “Struggle against Weismannism,” p. 114.

  69. See L. Ya.Blyakher, Istoriia embriologii v Rossi s seredny XIXdo seredry XX veka; bespozvonochnye [History of Embryology in Russia from the Middle of the Nineteenth to the Middle of the Twentieth Century] (Moscow: Izo-vo Akademii nauk, 1959), pp. 81–82.

    Google Scholar 

  70. M. S. Ganin, “The Cell Nucleus as an Organ of Heredity (A Critical Analysis of ‘Nuclear’ Theory) [Russian],” Nautchnoe Obozrenie (1894), no. 28, pp. 872–880; no. 29, pp. 897–905; and no. 30, pp. 929–937; quotation from p. 875.

  71. Ibid., p. 874.

  72. Ibid., p. 878.

  73. Ibid., p. 887.

  74. Ibid.

  75. Ibid., p. 931.

  76. Ibid., p. 936.

  77. Novikov, “Struggle against Weismannism,” p. 112.

  78. V. M.Shimkevitch, Izmeniaemost' i nasledstvennost'. [Variation and Heredity] (St. Petersburg: Izdanie Peterburgskogo universiteta, 1894) and “The Ancient Puzzle (the Problem of Heredity) [Russian],” Severnyi Vestnik (1894), no. 10, pp. 49–64.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Shimkevitch, “Ancient Puzzle,” pp. 50–51.

  80. Ibid., p. 63.

  81. V. M.Shimkevitch, Izmeniaemost' i nasledstvennost'. [Variation and Heredity] (St. Petersburg: Izdanie Peterburgskogo universiteta, 1894) p. 23.

    Google Scholar 

  82. V. M.Shimkevitch, Nasledstvennost' i popytki eë ob'iasneniia [Heredity and Attempt to Explain It] (St. Petersburg: Izdanie L. F. Panteleeva, 1896), p. 62.

    Google Scholar 

  83. N. A. Kholodkovsky, “Heredity” (1897) [Russian], in Kholodkovsky, Biologicheskie ocherki [Biological Essays], pp. 116–142; quotation from p. 119.

  84. Ibid., p. 122.

  85. Ibid., p. 142.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gaissinovitch, A.E. Problems of variation and heredity in Russian biology in the late nineteenth century. J Hist Biol 6, 97–123 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00137300

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00137300

Keywords

Navigation