Abstract
A strong tradition in educational research has involved several widely-used instruments assessing student or teacher perceptions of characteristics of actual or preferred classroom psychosocial environment. Existing instruments, however, are unsuitable for one of the most important settings in science teaching, namely, the science laboratory class. Consequently, the present research aimed to develop and validate a new instrument, the Science Laboratory Environment Inventory (SLEI), which is specifically suited to science laboratory environments at the higher education level. The SLEI assesses students' or teachers' perceptions of five dimensions of actual or preferred classroom environment, namely, Student Cohesiveness, Open-Endedness, Integration, Rule Clarity, and Material Environment. A distinctive feature of the design of the study was that the instrument was field tested and validated cross-nationally in six different countries, namely, the USA, Canada, Australia, England, Israel, and Nigeria. The total sample consisted of 1720 students in 71 university laboratory classes. Various item and factor analyses guided the evolution of a refined version, and attested to each SLEI scale's internal consistency reliability, discriminant validity, factorial validity, predictive validity (i.e., ability to predict student outcomes), and ability to differentiate between the perceptions of students in different classes. An important finding was that the SLEI is equally valid for use in its actual and preferred versions, and for the individual or the class mean as the unit of analysis. As well, separate within-country analyses confirmed the validity and usefulness of the SLEI in each of the six countries involved in the field testing. Overall, the study attested to the general advantages of employing cross-national designs in learning environment research.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, C.S. (1982). ‘The search for school climate: A review of research’, Review of Educational Research 52, 368–420.
Burden, R., and Fraser, B.J. (1991). ‘Use of classroom environment assessments in school psychology: A British perspective’, Paper presented at annual meeting of American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
Chavez, R.C. (1984). ‘The use of high inference measures to study classroom climates: A review’, Review of Educational Research 54, 237–261.
Cheung, K.C., Keeves, J.P., Sellin, N., and Tsoi, S.C. (1990). ‘The analysis of multilevel data in educational research: Studies of problems and their solutions’, International Journal of Educational Research 14, 215–319. (whole issue).
Ellett, C.D., Loup, K.S., and Chauvin, S.W. (1989). System for Teaching and Learning Assessment and Review (STAR): Annotated Guide to Teaching and Learning. Barton Rouge, LA: Louisiana Teaching Internship and Teacher Evaluation Projects, College of Education, Louisiana State University.
Fisher, D.L. (ed.) (1992). The Study of Learning Environments, Volume 6. Launceston, Tasmania: University of Tasmania.
Fisher, D.L., and Fraser, B.J. (1983). ‘A comparison of actual and preferred classroom environment as perceived by science teachers and students’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching 20, 55–61.
Fisher, D.L., and Fraser, B.J. (1991). ‘Incorporating learning environment ideas into teacher education: An Australian perspective’, Paper presented at annual meeting of American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
Fraser, B.J. (1982). ‘Differences between student and teacher perceptions of actual and preferred classroom learning environment’. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 4, 511–519.
Fraser, B.J. (1986). Classroom Environment. London: Croom Helm.
Fraser, B.J. (ed.) (1987). The Study of Learning Environments, Volume 2. Perth: Curtin University of Technology.
Fraser, B.J. (1989a). ‘Improving science teacher education programs through inclusion of research on classroom psychosocial environments’, in J. Barufaldi (ed.), Improving Preservice/Inservice Science Teacher Education: Future Perspectives. 1987 Yearbook of the Association for Education of Teachers of Science, Columbus, OH: SMEAC Information Reference Center and ERIC Clearinghouse for Science, Mathematics and Environmental Education.
Fraser, B. (1989b). ‘Twenty years of classroom environment work: Progress and prospect’, Journal of Curriculum Studies 21, 307–327.
Fraser, B.J. (in press). ‘Context: Classroom and school climate’, in D. Gabel (ed.), Handbook of Research on Science Teaching and Learning. New York: Macmillan.
Fraser, B.J., Docker, J.G., and Fisher, D.L. (1988). ‘Assessing and improving school climate’, Evaluation and Research in Education 2(3), 109–122.
Fraser, B.J., and Fisher, D.L. (1982). ‘Predicting students’ outcomes from their perceptions of classroom psychosocial environment’, American Educational Research Journal 19, 498–518.
Fraser, B.J., and Fisher, D.L. (1983a). ‘Student achievement as a function of person-environment fit: A regression surface analysis’, British Journal of Educational Psychology 53, 89–99.
Fraser, B.J., and Fisher, D.L. (1983b). ‘Use of actual and preferred classroom environment scales in person-environment fit research’, Journal of Educational Psychology 75, 303–313.
Fraser, B.J., and Fisher, D.L. (1986). ‘Using short forms of classroom climate instruments to assess and improve classroom psychosocial environment’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching 23, 387–413.
Fraser, B.J., Giddings, G.J., and McRobbie, CJ. (1991). ‘Science laboratory classroom environments: A cross-national perspective’, Paper presented at annual meeting of American Educational Research Association, Chicago, April.
Fraser, B J., and O'Brien, P. (1985). ‘Student and teacher perceptions of the environment of elementary-school classrooms’, Elementary School Journal, 85, 567–580.
Fraser, B.J., and Rentoul, A.J. (1982). ‘Relationship between school-level and classroom-level environment’. Alberta Journal of Educational Research 28, 212–225.
Fraser, B.J., and Tobin, K. (1989). ‘Student perceptions of psychosocial environments in classrooms of exemplary science teachers’, International Journal of Science Education 11, 14–34.
Fraser, B.J., and Tobin, K. (1991). ‘Combining qualitative and quantitative methods in classroom environment research’, in B.J. Fraser and H.J. Walberg (eds.), Educational Environments: Evaluation, Antecedents and Consequences. Oxford, England: Pergamon Press.
Fraser, B.J., Tobin, K., and Rennie, L.J. (1990). ‘The learning environment as a focus in a study of higher-level cognitive learning’, International Journal of Science Education 12, 531–548.
Fraser, B.J., and Treagust, D.F. (1986). ‘Validity and use of an instrument of assessing classroom psychosocial environment in higher education’, Higher Education 15, 37–57.
Fraser, B.J., and Walberg, H.J. (eds.) (1991). Educational Environments: Evaluation, Antecedents and Consequences. Oxford, England: Pergamon Press.
Gallagher, J.J. (1987). ‘A summary of research in science education’, Science Education 71, 277–284.
Giddings, G., and Fraser, B.J. (1990). ‘Cross-national development, validation and use of an instrument for assessing the environment of science laboratory classes’, Paper presented at annual meeting of American Educational Research Association, Boston, April.
Goldstein, H. (1987). Multilevel Models in Educational and Social Research. London: Charles Griffin.
Haertel, G.D., Walberg, H.J., and Haertel, E.H. (1981). ‘Socio-psychological environments and learning: A quantitative synthesis’, British Educational Research Journal 7, 27–36.
Hegarty, E. (1987). ‘Science laboratory teaching’, in M.J. Dunkin (ed.), International Encyclopedia of Teaching and Teacher Education. Oxford, England: Pergamon Press.
Hegarty-Hazel, E. (Ed.) (1990). The Student Laboratory and the Science Curriculum. London: Routledge.
Hodson, D. (1988). ‘Experiments in science and science teaching’, Educational Philosophy and Theory 20(2), 53–66.
Hodson, D. (1990). ‘A critical look at practical work in school science’, School Science Review 70, 33–40.
Hofstein, A., and Lunetta, V. (1982). ‘The role of the laboratory in science teaching: Neglected areas of research’, Review of Educational Research 52, 201–207.
Lawrenz, F. (1987). ‘Gender effects for student perceptions of the classroom psychosocial environment’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching 24: 689–697.
Layton, D. (1989). Reconceptualizing Science and Technology Education for Tomorrow. London: British Council.
Luecht, R.M., and Smith, P.L. (1989). ‘The effects of bootstrapping strategies on the estimation of variance components’, Paper presented at annual meeting of American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
MacAuley, D.J. (1990). ‘Classroom environment: A literature review’, Educational Psychology 10, 239–253.
Moos, R.H. (1974). The Social Climate Scales: An Overview. Palo Alto, Calif.: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Moos, R.H. (1978). ‘A typology of junior high and high school classrooms’, American Educational Research Journal 15, 53–66.
Moos, R.H. (1979). Evaluating Educational Environments: Procedures, Measures, Findings and Policy Implications. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Mosteller, F., and Tukey, J.W. (1977). Data Analysis and Regression: A Second Course in Statistics. Reading: Addison-Wesley.
Pickering, M. (1980). ‘Are lab courses a waste of time?’ The Chronicle of Higher Education 19, 44–50.
Raudenbush, S., and Bryk, A.S. (1986). ‘A hierarchical model of studying school effects’, Sociology of Education 59, 1–17.
Raviv, Amiram, Raviv, Alona, and Reisel, E. (1990). ‘Teacher and students: Two different perspectives?! Measuring social climate in the classroom’, American Educational Research Journal 27, 141–157.
Sitronik, K.A. (1980). ‘Psychometric implications of the unit-of-analysis problem (with examples from the measurement of organizational climate)’, Journal of Educational Measurement 17: 245–282.
Stake, R.E., and Easley, J.A. (1978). Case Studies in Science Education. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois.
Tobin, K. (1986). ‘Secondary science laboratory activities’, European Journal of Science Education 8, 199–211.
Tobin, K. (1990). ‘Research on science laboratory activities: In pursuit of better questions and answers to improve learning’, School Science and Mathematics 90, 403–418.
Tobin, K., and Fraser, B.J. (eds.) (1987). Exemplary Practice in Science and Mathematics Education. Perth: Curtin University of Technology.
Tobin, K., Kahle, J.B., and Fraser, B.J. (eds.) (1990). Windows Into Science Classrooms: Problems Associated with Higher-Level Cognitive Learning. London: Falmer Press.
Trickett, E.J. (1978). ‘Toward a social-ecological conception of adolescent socialization: Normative data on contrasting types of public school classrooms’, Child Development 49, 408–414.
Trickett, E.J., Trickett, P.K., Castro, J.J., and Schaffner, P. (1982). ‘The independent school experience: Aspects of normative environments of single sex and coed schools’, Journal of Educational Psychology 74, 374–381.
Walberg, H.J. (ed.) (1979). Educational Environments and Effects: Evaluation, Policy, and Productivity. Berkeley, California: McCutchan.
Walberg, H.J. (1991). ‘Improving school science in advanced and developing countries’, Review of Educational Research 61, 25–69.
Waxman, H.C., and Ellett, C.D. (eds.) (1991). The Study of Learning Environments, Volume 5. Houston, TX: University of Houston.
Welch, W.W., and Walberg, H.J. (1972). ‘A national experiment in curriculum evaluation’, American Educational Research Journal 9, 373–383.
Woolnough, B.E. (ed.) (1991). Practical Science: The Role and Reality of Practical Work in School Science. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
Wubbels, Th., Brekelmans, M., and Hooymayers, H. (1991). ‘Interpersonal teacher behavior in the classroom’, in B.J. Fraser and H.J. Walberg (eds.), Educational Environments: Evaluation, antecedents and consequences. Oxford, England: Pergamon Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fraser, B.J., Giddings, G.J. & McRobbie, C.J. Assessment of the psychosocial environment of university science laboratory classrooms: a cross-national study. High Educ 24, 431–451 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00137241
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00137241