Conclusion
ASL compounds are formed through a process which systematically alters the form of both lexical stems which enter into the process. The resulting phonetic form of a productively derived ASL compound is traceable to the two signs from which it was derived, but does not consist of two meaningful phonetic forms. Once lexicalized, ASL compounds undergo diachronic changes to such an extent that there is no longer even the possibility of considering a synchronic derivation for these forms. In spite of this, words such as BELIEVE and AGREE retain their identity as compounds as demonstrated by their unexpected behavior when inflected for unrealized-inceptive aspect. We are led to the conclusion that in ASL a lexical compound (but not a productively formed compound) is composed of two phonological parts which are neither lexical stems nor morphemes. Since they come about as a result of the lexicalization process, we have called them Lexicalized Phonological Remnants.
The illustrations for this paper are by Paul M. Setzer. The production of the illustrations was supported by the Gallaudet Research Institute.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aronoff, Mark: 1976, ‘Word Formation in Generative Grammar’, in Linguistic Inquiry Monograph 1, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Battison, Robbin: 1978, Lexical Borrowing in American Sign Language, Linstok Press, Silver Spring, Maryland.
Bloomfield, Leonard: 1933, Language, Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York.
Bolinger, Dwight: 1972, ‘Accent is Predictable (If You're a Mind-Reader)’, Language 48, 633–44.
Chomsky, Noam and Morris Halle: 1968, The Sound Pattern of English, Harper and Row, New York.
Clements, George and S. Jay Keyser: 1983, CV Phonology: A Generative Theory of the Syllable, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Frishberg, Nancy: 1975, ‘Arbitrariness and Iconicity: Historical Change in American Sign Language’, Language 51, 676–710.
Goldsmith, John A.: 1976, Autosegmental Phonology, unpublished MIT dissertation.
Hayes, Bruce: 1986, ‘Inalterability in CV Phonology, Language 62, 321–351.
Jespersen, Otto: 1984, Analytic Syntax, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois (reprint of the 1937 edition).
Kiparsky, Paul: 1982, ‘Lexical Morphology and Phonology’, in Yang, I.-S. (ed.), Linguistics in the Morning Calm, Hanshin, Seoul, pp. 3–91.
Klima, Edward and Ursula Bellugi: 1979, The Signs of Language, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Langacker, Ronald W.: in press, Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. 1: Theoretical Prerequisites, Stanford University Press, Stanford, California.
Liddell, Scott: 1983, ‘Compound Formation Rules in American Sign Language’, in Stokoe, William and Virginia Volterra (eds.), SLR '83, Sign Language Research, Linstok Press, Silver Spring, Maryland, pp. 144–151.
—: 1984a, ‘THINK and BELIEVE: Sequentiality in American Sign Language’, Language 60, 372–99.
—: 1984b, ‘Unrealized-Inceptive Aspect in American Sign Language: Feature Insertion in Syllabic Frames’, in Drogo, Joseph, Veena Mishra, and David Testen (eds.), Papers from the Twentieth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago, Illinois, pp. 257–270.
-- and Robert E. Johnson: 1985, ‘American Sign Language: The Phonological Base’, ms.
Marantz, Alec: 1982, ‘Re Reduplication’, Linguistic Inquiry 13, 435–482.
Matthews, P. H.: 1974, Morphology, an Introduction to the Theory of Word-Structure, Cambridge University Press, London.
McCarthy, John: 1981, Formal Problems in Semitic Phonology and Morphology, unpublished MIT dissertation.
Mohanan, K. P.: 1982, Lexical Phonology, MIT dissertation, published in revised form as The Theory of Lexical Phonology, D. Reidel, 1986.
Nida, Eugene: 1949, Morphology. The Descriptive Analysis of Words, (2nd and completely new edn., University of Michigan Publications in Linguistics II, Ann. Arbor, Michigan).
Padden, Carol and David Perlmutter: 1985, ‘American Sign Language and the Architecture of Phonological Theory’, ms.
Selkirk, Elisabeth O.: 1982, ‘The Syntax of Words’, in Linguistic Inquiry Monograph 7, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Stokoe, William C., Jr.: 1960, ‘Sign Language Structure: An Outline of the Visual Communication Systems of the American Deaf’, in Studies in Linguistics: Occasional Papers 8, University of Buffalo, Buffalo, New York (rev. edn., Linstok Press, Silver Spring, Maryland, 1978)
—, D. Casterline, and C. Croneberg: 1965, A Dictionary of American Sign Language on Linguistic Principles, Gallaudet College Press, Washington, DC. (rev. edn., Linstok Press, Silver Spring, Maryland, 1976).
Supalla, Ted and Elisa Newport: 1978, ‘How Many Seats in a Chair? The Derivation of Nouns and Verbs in American Sign Language’, in Siple, Patricia (ed.), Understanding Language Through Sign Language Research, Academic Press, New York, pp. 91–132.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
We would like to thank our students over the past four years for their thought provoking reactions to our work on ASL phonetic structure and the structure of compounds in particular. We are also grateful to Susan Fischer, Ceil Lucas, and Walt Wolfram for their comments on an earlier draft of this paper.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Liddell, S.K., Johnson, R.E. American Sign Language compound formation processes, lexicalization, and phonological remnants. Nat Lang Linguist Theory 4, 445–513 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00134470
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00134470