Skip to main content
Log in

Units and passages: A view for evolutionary biology and ecology

  • Published:
Biology and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many authors, including paleobiologists, cladists and so on, adopt a nested hierarchical viewpoint to examine the relationships among different levels of biological organization. Furthermore, species are often considered to be unique entities in functioning evolutionary processes and one of the individuals forming a nested hierarchy.

I have attempted to show that such a hierarchical view is inadequate in evolutionary biology. We should define units depending on what we are trying to explain. Units that play an important role in evolution and ecology do not necessarily form a nested hierarchy. Also the relationships among genealogies at different levels are not simply nested. I have attempted to distinguish the different characteristics of passages when they are used for different purposes of explanation. In my analysis, species and monophyletic taxa cannot be uniquely defined as single units that function in ecological and evolutionary processes.

The view discussed in this paper may provide a more general basis for testing competing theories in evolution, and provide new insights for future empirical studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arthur, W.: 1984, Mechanisms of Morphological Evolution: A Combined Genetic, Developmental and Ecological Approach, J. Wiley & Son, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton, N. H. and B. Charlesworth: 1984, ‘Genetic Revolutions, Founder Effects and Speciation’, Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 15, 133–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandon, R. N. and R. M. Burian (eds.): 1984, Genes, Organisms, Populations: Controversies Over the Units of Selection, MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bush, G. L., S. M. Case, A. C. Wilson and J. L. Patton: 1977, ‘Rapid Speciation and Chromosomal Evolution in Mammals’, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 74, 3942–3946.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charlesworth, B., R. Lande and M. Slatkin: 1982, ‘A Neo-Darwinian Commentary on Macroevolution’, Evolution 36, 474–498.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalmers, A. F.: 1982, What is This Thing Called Science? 2nd ed., Univ. Queensland Press, Queensland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damuth, J.: 1985, ‘Selection Among “Species”: A Formation in Terms of Natural Functional Units’, Evolution 39, 1132–1146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R.: 1982a, The Extended Phenotype: The Gene as the Unit of Selection, Freeman, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R.: 1982b, ‘Replicators and Vehicles’, in King's College Sociobiology Group (ed.), Current Problems in Sociobiology, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, pp. 45–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dover, G. A. and R. B. Flavell (eds.): 1982, Genome Evolution. Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich, P. R. and P. H. Raven: 1969, ‘Differentiation of Populations’, Science 165, 1228–1232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eldredge, N.: 1985, Unfinished Synthesis: Biological Hierarchies and Modern Evolutionary Thought, Oxford Univ. Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eldredge, N. and S. J. Gould: 1972, ‘Punctuated Equilibria: An Alternative to Phyletic Gradualism’, in T. J. M. Schopf (ed.), Models in Paleontology, Freeman, San Francisco, pp. 88–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eldredge, N. and J. Cracraft: 1980, Phylogenetic Patterns and the Evolutionary Process: Methods and Theory in Comparative Biology, Columbia Univ. Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eldredge, N. and S. N. Salthe: 1984, ‘Hierarchy and Evolution’, Oxford Surveys Evol. Biol. 1, 184–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Endler, J. A.: 1977, Geographic Variation, Speciation and Clines, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferris, S. D., R. D. Sage, C. M. Huang, J. T. Nielsen, U. Ritte and A. C. Wilson: 1983, ‘Flow of Mitochondrial DNA Across a Species Boundary’, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 80, 2290–2294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feyerbend, P. K.: 1975, Against Method, New Left Books, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallez, G. P. and L. D. Gottlieb: 1982, ‘Genetic Evidence for the Hybrid Origin of the Diploid Plant, Stephanomeria DiegensisEvolution 36, 1158–1167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghiselin, M. T.: 1974, ‘A radical Solution to the Species Problem’. Syst. Zool. 23, 536–544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilinsky, N. L.: 1986, ‘Species Selection as a Causal Process’, Evol. Biol. 20, 249–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S. J.: 1980, ‘Is a New and General Theory of Evolution Emerging?’ Paleobiol. 6, 119–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S. J.: 1982, ‘The Meaning of Punctuated Equilibrium and its Role in Validating a Hierarchical Approach to Macroevolution. in R. Milkman (ed.), Perspective on Evolution, Sinauer, Sunderland, pp. 83–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S. J. and N. Eldredge: 1977, ‘Punctuated Equilibria: The Tempo and Mode of Evolution Reconsidered’, Paleobiol. 3, 115–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, B. C.: 1984, ‘Changing from an Evolutionary to Generative Paradigm in Biology’ in J. W. Pollard (ed.), Evolutionary Theory: Paths into the Future, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, pp. 99–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, M. M.: 1980, ‘Transposable Genetic Elements in Drosophila and Other Diptera’, Ann. Rev. Genet. 14, 109–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, N. R.: 1969, Perception and Discovery, Freeman, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, A.: 1984, ‘Species Selection’, Evol. Biol. 18, 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holsinger, K. E.: 1984, ‘The Nature of Biological Species’, Phil. Sci. 51, 293–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, D. L.: 1976, ‘Are species Really Individuals? Syst. Zool. 25, 174–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, D. L.: 1980, ‘Individuality and Selection’, Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 11, 311–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, D. L.: 1981, ‘Units of Evolution: A Metaphysical Essay’, in J. Jensen and R. Harre (eds.), The Philosophy of Evolution, Harvester Press, Brinhton, pp. 23–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jablonski, D.: 1986, ‘Background and Mass Extinctions: The Alternation of Macroevolutionary Regimes’, Science 231, 129–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimura, M.: 1983, The Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitcher, P.: 1984, ‘Species’, Phil. Sci. 51, 308–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T.: 1970, The Structure of Scientific Revolution, 2nd ed. Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakatos, I.: 1978, Imre Lalatos, Philosophical Papers Vol. 1: the Methodology of Scientific Research Programs. (J. Worrel and G. Currie eds.), Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.

  • Lande, R.: 1980, ‘Microevolution in Relation to Macroevolution’, Paleobiol. 6, 235–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lande, R. and S. J. Arnold: 1983, ‘The Measurement of Selection on Correlated Characters’, Evolution 37, 1210–1226.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeRoith, D. and J. Roth: 1984, ‘Vertebrate Hormones and Neuropeptides in Microbes: Evolutionary Origin of Intercellular Communication’, Frontiers in Neuroendcrinology 8, 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margulis, L.: 1981, Symbiosis in Cell Evolution: Life and Its Environment of the Early Earth, W. H. Freeman, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith, J.: 1983, ‘The Genetics of Stasis and Punctuation’, Ann. Rev. Genet. 17, 11–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E.: 1963, Animal Species and Evolution, Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishler, B. D.: 1985, ‘The Morphological, Developmental, and Phylogenetic Basis of Species Concepts in Bryophytes’, The Bryologist 88, 207–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishler, B. D. and M. J. Donoghue: 1982, ‘Species Concepts: A Case for Pluralism’, Syst. Zool. 31, 491–503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nei, M.: 1971, ‘Interspecific Gene Differences and Evolutionary Time Estimated from Electrophoretic Data or Protein Identity’, Am. Nat. 105, 385–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohno, S.: 1970, Evolution by Gene Duplication, Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oster, G. and P. Alberch: 1982, ‘Evolution and Bifurcation of Developmental Programs’, Evolution 36, 444–459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paterson, H. E. H.: 1978, ‘More Evidence Against Speciation by Reinforcement’, S. Afr. J. Sci. 74, 369–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paterson, H. E. H.: 1982, ‘Perspective on Speciation by Reinforcement’, S. Afr. J. Sci. 78, 53–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pashley, D. P., K. S. Rai and D. N. Pashley: 1985, ‘Patterns of Allozyme Relationships Compared with Morphology, Hybridization, and Geologic History in Allopatric Island-Dwelling Mosquitoes’, Evolution 39, 985–997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, J. R.: 1983, ‘Interspecific Cytoplasmic Gene Flow in the Absence of Nuclear Gene Flow Evidence Form Drosophila’, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 80, 482–495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricklefs, R. E.: 1979, Ecology, 2nd ed.. Chiron Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roizes, G. P. and M. Pages: 1982, ‘Conserved and Divergent Sequences of Bovine Satellite DNA’, in G. A. Dover and R. B. Flavell (eds.), Genome Evolution, Academic Press, London, pp. 95–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, G. G.: 1961, Principles of Animal Taxonomy, Columbia Univ. Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slack, J.: 1984, ‘A Rosetta Stone for Pattern Formation in Animals?’ Nature 310, 364–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sober, F.: 1984, The Nature of Selection: Evolutionary Theory in Philosophical Focus, MIT Press, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spolsky, C. and T. Uzzel: 1984, ‘Natural Interspecies Transfer Mitochondria DNA Amphibians’, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 81, 5802–5805.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, S. M.: 1979, Macroevolution: Patter and Process, Freeman, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins, G. G.: 1950, Variation and Evolution in Plants, Columbia Univ. Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takahata, N. and M. Nei: 1986, ‘Gene Genealogy and Variance of Interpopulational Nucleotide Differences’, Genetics 110, 325–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Templeton, A. R.: 1981, ‘Mechanisms of Speciation: A Population Genetic Approach’, Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 12, 23–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Valen, L.: 1976, ‘Ecological Species, Multispecies and Oaks’, Taxon 25, 233–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Valen, L.: 1982, ‘Integration of Species: Stasis and Biogeography’, Evol. Theor. 6, 99–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vrba, E. and N. Eldredge: 1984, ‘Individuals, Hierarchies and Processes: Towards a More Complete Evolutionary Theory’, Paleobiol. 10, 146–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, G.: 1984, ‘The Relations of Natural Forms’, H-W. Ho, and P. T. Saunders (eds.), Beyond Neo-Darwinism, Academic Press, New York, pp. 193–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, M. J. D.: 1987, Mode of Speciation, Freeman, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiley, E. O.: 1981, Phylogenetics: The Theory and Practice of Phylogenetic Systematics, Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G. C.: 1985, ‘A Defense of Reductionism in Evolutionary Biology’, Oxford Sur. Evol. Biol. 2, 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D. S.: 1980, The Natural Selection of Populations and Communities, Benjamin/Commings, Menlo Parks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D. S.: 1986, ‘Adaptive Indirect Effect’, in J. Diamond and T. J. Case (eds.), Community Ecology, Harper & Row, New York, pp. 437–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, J. C. and L. Manuelidis: 1980, ‘Sequence Definition and Organization of a Human Repeated DNA’, J. Mol. Biol. 142, 386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yonekawa, H. et al.: 1982, ‘Origins of Laboratory Mice Deduced from Restriction Patterns of Mitochondrial DNA’, Differentiation 22, 222–226.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kawata, M. Units and passages: A view for evolutionary biology and ecology. Biol Philos 2, 415–434 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00127699

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00127699

Key words

Navigation