Why the evolution of resistance to anthropogenic toxins normally involves major gene changes: the limits to natural selection

Abstract

Standard population genetic theory suggests that adaptation should normally be achieved by the spread of many genes each of small effect (polygenes), and that adaptation by major genes should be unusual. Such models depend on consideration of the rates of acquisition of adaptation. In practice, adaptation to pollutants and anthropogenic toxins has most frequently been achieved by the spread of major genes. A simple model is developed to explain this discrepancy, in which the determining factor is not the rate of spread, but the maximum response achievable under the two contrasting models of polygenic or major gene inheritance. In the short term, for a given mean and genetic variance, characters in which the additive genetic variance is produced by the segregation of many genes of small effect at intermediate gene frequencies are unable to produce as large a response to directional selection as characters in which the variance is caused by genes of large effect at low frequency. If the ‘target’ for selection is a long way from the mean prior to selection (as it may well be for adaptation to novel anthropogenic stresses) then adaptation can only be achieved by species possessing major genes. The model is discussed with reference to the example of heavy metal tolerance in plants.