Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Fertility and eugenics: Singapore's population policies

  • Published:
Population Research and Policy Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Singapore, after serving for two decades as a model for Third World birth control and economic development programs, is now abandoning its earlier population policies in favor of encouraging dramatic population growth. The initial eugenics-based program introduced in 1984 sought increased fertility for university-educated women and provided major subsidies for the voluntary sterilization of poor and uneducated parents. These much publicized and internationally discussed programs have now been abandoned in favor of new population programs seeking to encourage fertility in lower as well as better educated groups. A forty percent population increase is being set as a goal. To accomplish this the effective Singapore Family Planning and Population Board has been abolished and Housing Development Board policies are in the process of being reversed to encourage rather than discourage fertility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Asiaweek (1984). ‘Breeding the Brightest’, Mar. 2: 24–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asiaweek (1984). ‘The Great Debate Over Genes’, Mar. 2: 26–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asiaweek (1984). ‘We're Bail-Bearings, Quality Controlled’, (interview with Toh Chin Chye, Vice-Chancellor (President) of University of Singapore 1968–75), Sept. 7.

  • Bellows, Thomas (1983). ‘Big Fish, Small Pond’, Wilson Quarterly, Winter: 63-82.

  • Buchanan, Iain (1972). Singapore in Southeast Asia. London: G. Bell and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chee Heng Leng and Chan Chee Khoon (eds) (1984). Designer Genes; IQ, Ideology and Biology. Selangor, Malaysia: Institute for Social Analysis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Peter and James Fawcett (eds) (1979). Public Policy and Population Change. New York: The Population Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochrane, S.H. (1979). Fertility and Education: What Do We Really Know? Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crosette, Barbara (1984). ‘The Opulence of Singapore’ New York Times Magazine, Dec. 16: 122, 124, 142–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daily Telegraph (1984). Quoting H.J. Eysenck, London, Jan. 23.

  • David, H.P. and R.J. McIntyre (1981). Reproductive Behavior: Central and Eastern European Experience. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky, T. (1973). Genetic Diversity and Human Equality. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, B. and B. Waites (1981). IQ and Mental Testing. London: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, H.J. versus L. Kamin (1981). Intelligence: The Battle for the Mind. London: Pan Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S.J. (1981). The Mismeasure of Man. New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, Norman D. (1982). ‘Human Behavior Genetics’, Annual Review of Psychology 33: 403–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Housing and Development Board Annual Report 1984/85 (1985). Singapore.

  • Jensen, Arthur R. (1969). ‘How Much We Boost IQ and Scholastic Achievement’, Havard Educational Review 39: 1–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, Arthur R. (1980). Bias in Mental Testing. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamin, Leon J. (1984). Not In Our Genes: Biology, Ideology and Human Nature. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kevles, Daniel J. (1985). In the Name of Eugenics: Genetics and the Uses of Human Heredity. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu Thai-Ker (1982). ‘A Review of Public Housing in Singapore’, in S. Jaykumar (ed), Our Heritage and Beyond. Singapore: NTUC.

    Google Scholar 

  • London Daily Telegraph (1984). ‘Singapore Breeds Intelligence’, London, Jan. 23.

  • Nation Review, ‘Singapore Pays Women Not to Have Babies’, Bangkok, June 7, 1984.

  • Parmer, J. Norman ‘City of the Lion’, Wilson Quarterly, Winter: 49–65.

  • Salaff, Janet W. (1985). ‘Family Size Intentions and Socioeconomic Status in Singapore 1974–1981’, Studies in Family Planning 16: 199–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saw Swee Hock (1980). Population Control for Zero Growth in Singapore. Singapore: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singapore Family Planning and Population Board (1983). Population Projects for Singapore, Singapore.

  • Singapore Monitor (1983). ‘A Mother's Influence is Greater’, Singapore, Sept. 5.

  • Singapore Monitor (1984). ‘The Singaporeans Who Place Self Before Nation’, Singapore, Feb. 10.

  • Singapore Monitor (1984). ‘Jeya and Chiam Win’, Singapore, Dec. 23.

  • Social Development Unit (1985). Information Bulletin. Singapore: Ministry of Finance. June.

  • Social Development Commission (no date). Sharing a Life-Time.

  • Straits Times (1983). ‘Lop-sided Birth Rate Drop’, ‘80pc Nature and 20pc Nurture’, and ‘Talent for the Future’, Singapore, Aug. 15.

  • Straits Times (1983). ‘You Can't Succeed in Both Career and Marriage’, Singapore, Aug. 16.

  • Straits Times (1983). ‘Making of Dull and Bright Children’, Singapore, Sept. 9.

  • Straits Times (1983). ‘When Graduate Doesn't Marry Graduate’, Singapore, Sept. 5.

  • Straits Times (1983). ‘Economy Strong’, Singapore, Nov. 21.

  • Straits Times (1984). ‘Grad Mums Are Best’, Singapore, Jan. 11.

  • Straits Times (1984). P.M. Lee's speech, ‘Of Group Survival and Leadership’, Singapore, Sept. 3.

  • Straits Times (1985). ‘Time To Educate a New Generation’, P.M. Singapore, March 2.

  • Straits Times (1985). ‘When the House Sat and Talked of Love... ’, Singapore, March 7.

  • Straits Times (1985). ‘Graduate Mum Scheme to Go’, Singapore, March 26.

  • Tan Siok Bie, James Lee and S.S. Batnam (1979). ‘Effects of Disincentives About Pregnancy and Abortion’, in Peter Chen and James Fawcett (eds), Public Policy and Population Change. New York: The Population Council.

  • U.S. News and World Report (1984). ‘Singapore Proves Asian Work Ethic Pays Rich Rewards’, Aug. 20, 49-50.

  • Wilson, E.O. (1975). Sociobiology: The New Synthesis. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

  • Wong, Aline and Janet Salaff (1979). ‘Planning Births for a Better Life: Working Class Response to Population Disincentive’, in Peter Chen and James Fawcett (eds), Public Policy and Population Change. New York: The Population Council.

  • Yee, Stephen (1975). Public Housing in Singapore. Singapore: Singapore University Press.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Virginia Commonwealth University, 23284-001, Richmond, VA, USA

    J. John Palen

Authors
  1. J. John Palen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

The research reported here was partially funded by the Rockefeller Foundation and by a grant from the Population Council's International Research Awards Program on the Determinants of Fertility in Developing Countries, a program funded by the U.S. Agency for International Development.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Palen, J.J. Fertility and eugenics: Singapore's population policies. Popul Res Policy Rev 5, 3–14 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00124875

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00124875

Keywords

Search

Navigation