Skip to main content
Log in

Breeding-habitat use by five Amazonian frogs at forest edge

  • Papers
  • Published:
Biodiversity & Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Understanding patterns of speciesl habitat use and their response to dramatic changes in habitat constitutes a basis for sound conservation practice. This study examined use of breeding habitat by two rainforest-breeding frog species near primary forest edge. Nine artificial breeding pools were established along each of three transects perpendicular to continuous primary forest near Manaus, Brazil. Five frog species bred in the pools over the six-month monitoring period. For the two most abundant species, patterns of habitat use were independent of proximity to forest edge. Also,Epipedobates femoralis used pools outside the forest, in secondary growth, at the same frequency as pools inside the forest.Osteocephalus taurinus did not breed outside primary forest. These results have clear implications for conservation biology: (i) buffer zones around isolated reserves, to counter possible negative edge effects on habitat, are unnecessary for these frog species, and (ii) secondary growth habitat, which is not ‘natural’ breeding habitat forE. femoralis, could serve as a source of colonists for emigration into new areas and does not represent a barrier to dispersal for this species. These results argue against generalization of edge effects for different taxa.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andren, H. and Angelstam, P. (1988) Elevated predation rates as an edge effect in habitat islands; experimental exidence.Ecology 69, 544–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bierregaard, R.O. and Lovejoy, T.E. (1988) Birds in Amazonian forest fragments; effects of insularization. InActa XIX Cong. Intl. Ornith. (M., Ouellet, ed.) pp. 1564–79. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blouin, M.S. and Connor, E.F. (1985) Is there a best shape for nature reserves?Biol. Conserv. 32, 277–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brittingham, M.C. and Temple, S.A. (1983) Have cowbirds caused songbirds to decline?BioScience 33, 31–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, J.M. (1975) The island dilemma: lessons of modernbiogeographic studies for the design of natural reserves.Biol. Conserv. 7, 129–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, J.M. and May, R.M. (1976) Island biogeography and the design of natural reserves. InTheoretical Ecology (R.M., May, ed.) pp. 163–86. Philadelphia: Saunders.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duellman, W.E. (1978) The biology of an equatorial herpetofauna in Amazonian Ecuador.Misc. Publ. Mus. Nat. Hist. Univ. Kansas 65, 1–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Game, M. (1980) Best shape for natural reserves.Nature 287, 630–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gascon, C. (1991) Population and community level analyses of species occurrences of central amazonian rainforest tadpoles.Ecol. 72, 1731–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gosner, K.L. (1960) A simplified table for staging Anuran embryos and larvae with notes on identification.Herpetol. 16, 183–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, L.D. (1988) Edge effects and conservation of biotic diversity.Conserv, Biol. 2, 330–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janzen, D.H. (1983) No park is an island: increase interference from outside as park size decreases.Oikos 41, 402–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janzen, D.H. (1986) The eternal external threat. InConservation Biology (M., Soulé, ed.) pp. 286–303. Sunderland, Massachussets: Sinauer Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, V.R. (1947) Breeding birds of the forest edge in Illinois.Condor 2, 45–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapos, V. (1989) Effects of isolation on the water status of forest patches in the Brazilian Amazon.J. Trop. Ecol. 5, 173–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levenson, J.B. (1981) Woodlots as biogeographic islands in Southeastern Wisconsin, InForest islands in man-dominated landscapes (R.L., Burgess and D.M., Sharpe, eds) pp. 13–39. New York: Springer-Verlag Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovejoy, T.E., Bierregaard, R.O., Rylands, A.B., Malcolm, J.R., Quintela, C.E., Harper, L.H., Brown, K.S., Powell, A.H., Powell, G.U.N., Schubart, H.O.R. and Hays, M.B. (1986) Edge and other effects of isolation on Amazon forest fragments, InConservation Biology (M., Soulé, ed.) pp. 257–85. Sunderland, Massachussets: Sinauer Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piper, J.K. (1986) Effects of habitat and size of fruit display on removal ofSmilacena stellata (Liliaceae) fruits.Can. J. Bot. 64, 1050–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranney, J.W., Bruner, M.C. and Levenson, J.B. (1981) The importance of edge in the structure and dynamics of forest islands. InForest islands in man-dominated landscapes (R.L., Burgess and D.M., Sharpe, eds) pp. 67–95. New York: Springer-Verlag Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, R.R. (1976) Spatial heterogeneity and bird species diversity.Ecology 57, 773–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schonewald-Cox, C.M. and Bayless, J.W. (1986) The boundary model: a geographical analysis of design and conservation of nature reserves.Biol. Conserv. 38, 305–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Temple, S.A. (1986) Predicting impacts of habitat fragmentation on forest birds: A comparison of two models. InWildlife 2000 (J., Verner, M.L., Morrison and C.J., Ralph, eds) pp. 301–4. Madison, Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J.W., Maser, C. and Rodiek, J.E. (1978) Edges: their interspersion, resulting diversity and its measurement. InProceedings of a Workshop on Nongame Bird Habitat Management in the Coniferous Forests of the Western United States (R. DeGraaf, ed.) pp. 91–100. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report PNW64.

  • Whitcomb, R.F., Lynch, J.F., Opler, P.A. and Robbins, C.S. (1976) Letter to the editor,Science 193, 1030–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcove, D.S., McLellan, C.H. and Dobson, A.P. (1986) Habitat fragmentation in the temperate InConservation Biology (M., Soulé, ed.) pp. 237–56. Sunderland, Massachussets: Sinauer Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox, B.A. and Murphy, D.D. (1985) Conservation strategy: the effects of fragmentation on extinction.Am. Nat. 125, 879–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, M.H. (1975) The design of wildlife reserves.Nature 256, 519.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis, E.O. (1984) Conservation, subdivision of reserves and the anti-dismemberment hypothesis,Oikos 42, 396–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E.O. and Willis, E.O. (1975) Applied biogeography. InEcology and evolution of communities (M.L., Cody and J.M., Diamond, eds) pp. 522–34. Cambridge, Massachussets Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yahner, R.H. (1988) Changes in wildlife communities near edges.Conserv. Biol. 2, 333–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B.L. and Bierregaard, R.O. (1986) Relevance of the equilibrium theory of island biogeography and species-area relations to conservation, with a case from Amazonia.J. Biogeog. 13, 133–43.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gascon, G. Breeding-habitat use by five Amazonian frogs at forest edge. Biodivers Conserv 2, 438–444 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00114045

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00114045

Keywords

Navigation