Skip to main content
Log in

Genetic variation for rate of development in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster

  • Published:
Genetica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We have sampled wild chromosomes from two natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster and obtained flies fully homozygous for the second chromosome, the third chromosome, or both, as well as flies heterozygous for one or both wild chromosomes and balancer chromosomes. Rate of embryogenesis (egg laying to larval hatching) and rate of development from egg to adult are measured, by classifying the individuals into fast, intermediate, and slow developmental classes. The experiments indicate that variation for rate of embryogenesis and for rate of egg-to-adult development is plentiful in the natural populations. Various hypotheses are enunciated to account for the small range of phenotypic variation observed in wild-type individuals with respect to the two parameters (embryogenesis and egg-to-adult development) and for the difficulty in changing the mean rates by artificial selection. Appropriate experiments may decide among the hypotheses, helping us to understand the genetic control of rate of ontogenesis, which is an important fitness component.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cavener, D. R., 1983. The response of enzyme polymorphisms to developmental rate selection in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 105: 105–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, L. C., 1954. The population consequences of life history phenomena. Quart. Rev. Biol. 29: 103–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, J. M., Maynard Smith, J. & Sodhi, K. C., 1961. Asymmetrical responses to selection for rate of development in Drosophila subobscura. Gen. Research 2: 70–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, S. P., 1966. Correlated responses to selection for developmental rate of Tribolium. Genetica 37: 63–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky, Th., 1970. Genetics of the evolutionary process. Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky, Th., Lewontin, R. C. & Pavlovsky, O., 1964. The capacity for increase in chromosomally polymorphic and monomorphic populations of D. melanogaster. Heredity 19: 597–614.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J. B. & Thoday, J. M., 1963. Effects of disruptive selection. VIII. Imposed quasi-random mating. Heredity 18: 513–524.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ives, P. T., 1945. The genetic structure of American populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 30: 167–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kidwell, J. F. & Kidwell, M. M., 1966. The effect of inbreeding on body weight and abdominal chaeta number in Drosophila melanogaster. Can. J. genet. Cytol. 8: 207–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, I. M., 1954. Genetic homeostasis. Dover Publications, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, I. M. & Dempster, R., 1951. Attenuation of genetic progress under continued selection in poultry. Heredity 5: 75–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D., 1954. Gene-environment interaction: a relationship between dominance, heterosis, phenotypic stability and variability. Heredity 8: 333–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin, R. C., 1965. Selection for colonizing ability. In: The genetics of colonizing species (eds. H. G.Bauer & G. L.Stebbins). pp. 77–94. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marien, D., 1958. Selection for developmental rate of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics 43: 3–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marinković, D., 1967. Genetic loads affecting fertility in natural populations of D. pseudoobscura. Genetics 57: 701–709.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marinković, D., 1977. A new model explaining the variation of quantitative traits. Genetika 9/1: 17–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marinković, D. & Ayala, F. J. Selection for different rates of embryonic development in Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans. (submitted)

  • Mather, K., 1941. Variation and selection of polygenic characters. J. Genet. 41: 159–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mather, K., 1942. The balance of polygenic combinations. J. Genet. 43: 309–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mather, K., 1943. Polygenic inheritance and natural selection. Biol. Rev. 18: 32–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mather, K., 1953. Genetic control of stability in development. Heredity 7: 297–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mather, K. & Harrison, J. B., 1949. The manifold effect of selection. Heredity 3: 131–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mather, K. & Jinks, J. L., 1982. Biometrical genetics. 3rd ed. Chapman and Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, P. A., 1983. The evolutionary biology of colonizing species. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prout, T., 1962. The effects of stabilizing selection on the time of development in Drosophila melanogaster. Genet. Research 3: 364–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sang, J. H. & Clayton, G. A., 1957. Selection for larval development time in Drosophila. J. Hered. 48: 265–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, F. T. & Briles, W. E., 1953. The adaptive value of blood group genes in chickens. Genetics 38: 34–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seager, R. D., Ayala, F. J. & Marks, R. W., 1982. Chromosome interactions in Drosophila melanogaster. II. Total fitness. Genetics 102: 485–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thoday, J. M., 1953. Components of fitness. Symp. Soc. exp. Biol. 7: 96–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tigerstadt, F. M. A., 1969. Experiments on selection for developmental rate in Drosophila melanogaster. Ann. Acad. Sci. Fenn., Ser. A/IV, 148: 1–53.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Marinkovic, D., Ayala, F.J. Genetic variation for rate of development in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster . Genetica 71, 123–132 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00058695

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00058695

Keywords

Navigation