Abstract
Simulation software allows detailed modeling of building behavior. Nevertheless, they require a large number of input parameters, which can be affected by uncertainty leading to differences between actual and simulated results and making a calibration process required. The present study investigates an automatic optimization-based calibration built by coupling the simulation engine EnergyPlus and Python as simulation and optimization manager. Given the numerical feature of the building energy model, the elitist genetic algorithm was selected to execute a scalarized multi-objective optimization aiming to identify the most effective combinations of seven uncertain input parameters, which affect the space heating consumption. The optimization problem is solved scalarizing two objective functions—normalized mean bias error (NMBE) and coefficient of variation of the RMSE (CV(RMSE))—into a utility function, to minimize the difference between simulated and monitored space heating consumption based on a five-month control period. The methodology was thus tested on a school building located in southern Italy. The model accuracy was evaluated using the ASHRAE Guideline 14–2014 metrics: NMBE and CV(RMSE). An NMBE of 0.11% and a CV(RMSE) of 13.9% were reached after the optimization process, allowing the model to be considered calibrated.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
IEA Buildings—Tracking Report; Paris (2022)
Ferkl, L.: Jan Široký ceiling radiant cooling: comparison of ARMAX and subspace identification modelling methods. Build. Environ. 45, 205–212 (2010)
Li, X., Wen, J.: Review of building energy modeling for control and operation. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 37, 517–537 (2014)
Chong, A., Gu, Y., Jia, H.: Calibrating building energy simulation models: A review of the basics to guide future work. Energy Build. 253, 111533 (2021)
CIBSE TM54:2022 Evaluating Operational Energy Use at the Design Stage (2022)
ASHRAE Guideline 14-2014: Measurement of Energy, Demand, and Water Savings (2014)
Ruiz, G.R., Bandera, C.F.: Validation of Calibrated Energy Models: Common Errors. Energies (Basel) 10 (2017)
Reddy, T.A.: Literature review on calibration of building energy simulation programs: uses, problems, procedures, uncertainty, and tools. ASHRAE Trans. 112, 226–240 (2006)
Holland, J.H.: Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, and Artificial Intelligence (1975)
McCall, J.: Genetic algorithms for modelling and optimisation. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 184, 205–222 (2005)
Zinzi, M., Agnoli, S., Battistini, G., Bernabini, G.: Deep energy retrofit of the T. M. Plauto School in Italy—a five years experience. Energy Build. 126, 239–251 (2016)
Big Ladder Software Elements.
Bhandari, M., Shrestha, S., New, J.: Evaluation of weather datasets for building energy simulation. Energy Build. 49, 109–118 (2012)
Arpa Puglia. Dati Meteo Arpa Puglia. Available online: http://www.webgis.arpa.puglia.it/meteo/index.php. Accessed on 3 May 2022
Watanabe, T., Urano, Y., Hayashi, T.: Procedures for separating direct and diffuse insolation on a horizontal surface and prediction of insolation on tilted surfaces. Trans. Archit. Inst. Jpn. 330, 96–108 (1983)
Hopfe, C.J.: Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analysis in Building Performance Simulation for Decision Support and Design Optimization, Eindhoven University of Technology (2009)
UNI. UNI 10355: Walls and Floors. Thermal Resistance Values and Calculation Method; Milan (1994)
UNI. UNI/TS 11300-1: Energy Performance of Buildings—Part 1: Evaluation of Energy Need for Space Heating and Cooling; Milan (2014)
UNI UNI/TS 11300-2, Energy Performance of Buildings—Part 2: Evaluation of Primary Energy Need and of System Efficiencies Production, for Space Heating and Domestic Hot Water; Milan (2014)
D.P.R. n. 412 del 26 Agosto 1993: Regolamento recante norme per la progettazione, l'installazione, l'esercizio e la manutenzione degli impianti termici degli edifici ai fini del contenimento dei consumi di energia (1993)
Martínez, S., Eguía, P., Granada, E., Moazami, A., Hamdy, M.: A performance comparison of multi-objective optimization-based approaches for calibrating white-box building energy models. Energy Build 216, 109942 (2020)
Guanantara, N.: A review of multi-objective optimization: methods and its applications. Cogent. Eng. 5, 1502242 (2018)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Campagna, L.M., Carlucci, F., Carlucci, S., Fiorito, F. (2024). Automatic Optimization-Based Calibration Using Genetic Algorithms: A Case Study of a School Energy Model. In: Littlewood, J.R., Jain, L., Howlett, R.J. (eds) Sustainability in Energy and Buildings 2023. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 378. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-8501-2_62
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-8501-2_62
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-99-8500-5
Online ISBN: 978-981-99-8501-2
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)