Abstract
Every year, more than one million people die from road accidents. Between 10 and 30% of these accidents are due to human factors, especially drowsiness, stress, and inattention. Determining the psychophysical condition of the driver is important to help prevent those accidents, limit damage to things and people, and even reduce the number of deaths. Today's technology is moving in the analysis of the physiological data necessary to determine these states. However, one of the major problems concerning data collection is conducting the tests in a real-world environment. For this reason, designing and employing a virtual environment that recreates a simulation of real-world’s conditions would enable researchers to obtain reliable and realistic data without putting users at risk. The paper describes the development and validation of a configurable and scalable virtual environment, conceived to help researchers to set up the environment freely according to their research needs. The in-depth analysis explored a normal and an altered environmental condition to investigate and assess the negative parameters responsible for increasing driving inattention. Finally, the outcomes have become the first experimentation to create an AI-based simulator for diagnosing the driver's state of health.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
World Health Organization: Global status report on road safety 2018, Geneve (2018)
Medina, A.L., Lee, S.E., Wierwille, W.W., Hanowski, R.J.: Relationship between infrastructure, driver error, and critical incidents. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, vol. 48, pp. 2075–2079 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1177/154193120404801661
Stanton, N.A., Salmon, P.M.: Human error taxonomies applied to driving: a generic driver error taxonomy and its implications for intelligent transport systems. Saf. Sci. 47, 227–237 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2008.03.006
Hills, B.L.: Vision, visibility, and perception in driving. Perception 9, 183–216 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1068/p090183
Endsley M.R.: Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Hum. Factors J. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. 37, 32–64 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1518/001872095779049543
Green, M.: “How Long Does It Take to Stop?” Methodological analysis of driver perception-brake times. Transp. Hum. Factors 2, 195–216 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1207/STHF0203_1
Driver, J.: A selective review of selective attention research from the past century. Br. J. Psychol. 92, 53–78 (2001)
Cnossen, F., Meijman, T., Rothengatter, T.: Adaptive strategy changes as a function of task demands: a study of car drivers. Ergonomics 47, 218–236 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130310001629757
Patten, C.J., Kircher, A., Östlund, J., Nilsson, L.: Using mobile telephones: cognitive workload and attention resource allocation. Accid. Anal. Prev. 36, 341–350 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-4575(03)00014-9
Harbluk, J.L., Lalande, S.: Performing e-mail tasks while driving: the impact of speech-based tasks on visual detection. In: Driving Assessment 2005: Proceedings of the 3rd International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training, and Vehicle Design, pp. 311–317. University of Iowa, Iowa (2005). https://doi.org/10.17077/drivingassessment.1178
Jordan, P.W., Johnson, G.I.: Exploring mental workload via TLX: the case of operating a car stereo whilst driving. Vis. Veh. 4, 255–262 (1993)
Spence, C., Ho, C.: Multisensory warning signals for event perception and safe driving. Theor. Issues Ergon. Sci. 9, 523–554 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1080/14639220701816765
Damiani, S., Deregibus, E., Andreone, L.: Driver-vehicle interfaces and interaction: where are they going? Eur. Transp. Res. Rev. 1, 87–96 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12544-009-0009-2
Ho, C., Spence, C.: The Multisensory Driver: Implications for Ergonomic Car Interface Design (Human Factors in Road and Rail). CRC Press, Boca Raton (2008)
Ayoub, J., Zhou, F., Bao, S., Yang, X.J.: From manual driving to automated driving. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, pp. 70–90. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3342197.3344529
Gibson, Z., Butterfield, J., Marzano, A.: User-centered design criteria in next generation vehicle consoles. Procedia CIRP 55, 260–265 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.07.024
Pitts, M.J., Skrypchuk, L., Attridge, A., Williams, M.A.: Comparing the user experience of touchscreen technologies in an automotive application. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, pp. 1–8. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2014). https://doi.org/10.1145/2667317.2667418
Wintersberger, P., Riener, A., Schartmüller, C., Frison, A.-K., Weigl, K.: Let me finish before I take over. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, pp. 53–65. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3239060.3239085
Dukic, T., Hanson, L., Falkmer, T.: Effect of drivers’ age and push button locations on visual time off road, steering wheel deviation and safety perception. Ergonomics 49, 78–92 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540500422320
Lu, M., Wevers, K., Van Der Heijden, R.: Technical feasibility of advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) for road traffic safety. Transp. Plan. Technol. 28, 167–187 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1080/03081060500120282
Meschtscherjakov, A., Perterer, N., Trösterer, S., Krischkowsky, A., Tscheligi, M.: The neglected passenger—how collaboration in the car fosters driving experience and safety. In: Meixner, G., Müller, C. (eds.) Automotive User Interfaces, pp. 187–213. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49448-7_7
SAE: Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to On-Road Motor Vehicle Automated Driving Systems (2014). https://doi.org/10.4271/j3016_201401
McEvoy, S.P., Stevenson, M.R., Woodward, M.: The prevalence of, and factors associated with, serious crashes involving a distracting activity. Accid. Anal. Prev. 39, 475–482 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2006.09.005
Johns, M.W.: A sleep physiologist’s view of the drowsy driver. Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 3, 241–249 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-8478(01)00008-0
Soares, S., Ferreira, S., Couto, A.: Driving simulator experiments to study drowsiness: a systematic review. Traffic Inj. Prev. 21, 29–37 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2019.1706088
Wang, J., Sun, S., Fang, S., Fu, T., Stipancic, J.: Predicting drowsy driving in real-time situations: using an advanced driving simulator, accelerated failure time model, and virtual location-based services. Accid. Anal. Prev. 99, 321–329 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2016.12.014
Gielen, J., Aerts, J.-M.: Feature extraction and evaluation for driver drowsiness detection based on thermoregulation. Appl. Sci. 9, 3555 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/app9173555
May, J.F., Baldwin, C.L.: Driver fatigue: the importance of identifying causal factors of fatigue when considering detection and countermeasure technologies. Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 12, 218–224 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2008.11.005
Waterhouse, J., Fukuda, Y., Morita, T.: Daily rhythms of the sleep-wake cycle. J. Physiol. Anthropol. 31, 5 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1186/1880-6805-31-5
Pack, A.I., Pack, A.M., Rodgman, E., Cucchiara, A., Dinges, D.F., Schwab, C.W.: Characteristics of crashes attributed to the driver having fallen asleep. Accid. Anal. Prev. 27, 769–775 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-4575(95)00034-8
Gimeno, P.T., Cerezuela, G.P., Montanes, M.C.: On the concept and measurement of driver drowsiness, fatigue and inattention: implications for countermeasures. Int. J. Veh. Des. 42, 67 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1504/IJVD.2006.010178
Gastaldi, M., Rossi, R., Gecchele, G.: Effects of driver task-related fatigue on driving performance. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 111, 955–964 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.130
Ahlström, C., Anund, A., Fors, C., Åkerstedt, T.: The effect of daylight versus darkness on driver sleepiness: a driving simulator study. J. Sleep Res. 27, e12642 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1111/jsr.12642
Du, H., Zhao, X., Zhang, X., Zhang, Y., Rong, J.: Effects of fatigue on driving performance under different roadway geometries: a simulator study. Traffic Inj. Prev. 16, 468–473 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2014.971155
Ahlström, C., Anund, A., Fors, C., Åkerstedt, T.: Effects of the road environment on the development of driver sleepiness in young male drivers. Accid. Anal. Prev. 112, 127–134 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2018.01.012
Morales, J.M., Díaz-Piedra, C., Rieiro, H., Roca-González, J., Romero, S., Catena, A., Fuentes, L.J., Di Stasi, L.L.: Monitoring driver fatigue using a single-channel electroencephalographic device: a validation study by gaze-based, driving performance, and subjective data. Accid. Anal. Prev. 109, 62–69 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2017.09.025
Olstam, J.: Simulation of vehicles in a driving simulator using microscopic traffic simulation. In: Transport Simulation, pp. 43–58. EFPL Press (2009). https://doi.org/10.1201/9781439808016-c3
Carsten, O., Jamson, A.H.: Driving simulators as research tools in traffic psychology. In: Handbook of Traffic Psychology, pp. 87–96. Elsevier (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-381984-0.10007-4
Filtness, A.J., Anund, A., Fors, C., Ahlström, C., Åkerstedt, T., Kecklund, G.: Sleep-related eye symptoms and their potential for identifying driver sleepiness. J. Sleep Res. 23, 568–575 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1111/jsr.12163
Shahid, A., Wilkinson, K., Marcu, S., Shapiro, C.M.: Karolinska sleepiness scale (KSS). In: STOP, THAT and One Hundred Other Sleep Scales, pp. 209–210. Springer New York, NY (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9893-4_47
Allen, J.: Photoplethysmography and its application in clinical physiological measurement. Physiol. Meas. 28, R1–R39 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1088/0967-3334/28/3/R01
Kurian, D., Johnson Joseph, P.L., Radhakrishnan, K., Balakrishnan, A.A.: Drowsiness detection using photoplethysmography signal. In: 2014 Fourth International Conference on Advances in Computing and Communications, pp. 73–76. IEEE (2014). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICACC.2014.23
Cao, A., Chintamani, K.K., Pandya, A.K., Ellis, R.D.: NASA TLX: software for assessing subjective mental workload. Behav. Res. Methods. 41, 113–117 (2009). https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.1.113
Kirakowski, J., Corbett, M.: SUMI: the software usability measurement inventory. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 24, 210–212 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.1993.tb00076.x
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Longhin, J., Amidei, A., Giacobone, G.A. (2023). Exploring a Configurable Virtual Environment for the Assessment and Diagnosis of the Driver's Psychophysical State. In: Scataglini, S., Imbesi, S., Marques, G. (eds) mHealth and Human-Centered Design Towards Enhanced Health, Care, and Well-being. Studies in Big Data, vol 120. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-3989-3_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-3989-3_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-99-3988-6
Online ISBN: 978-981-99-3989-3
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)