Abstract
This study underscores the importance of place in the political formation of young people. In the research project, students from a middle school in Seattle were asked to map significant historical sites associated with women or an ethnic group in the city. The 29 seventh graders worked in teams and collaborated extensively on each of the mapping projects. The researchers used a participatory action research framework to study the varied ways in which the students began to comprehend how space is actively produced through human agency. Topics and themes that emerged as important included processes of spatial inclusion and exclusion for the historical groups that were studied, as well as the possibilities of challenge and contestation of those processes that were considered unjust. Some of these possibilities of challenge and political agency for the students were made evident through their own collaborative mapping projects.
Research in this article was supported by the National Geographic Education Foundation (#2008–UI03); and the Spencer Foundation (#20100052). Portions of this chapter also appeared in “From Redlining to Benevolent Societies: The Emancipatory Power of Spatial Thinking,” Theory and Research in Social Education 40, 2012, pp. 134–163.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aitken, S. (2002). Public participation, technological discourses and the scale of GIS. In W. Craig, T. Harris, & D. Weiner (Eds.), Community participation and geographic information systems (pp. 357–366). New York: Taylor and Francis.
Bednarz, S., Acheson, G., & Bednarz, R. S. (2006). Maps and map learning in social studies education. Social Education, 70(7), 398–404.
Blades, M., Blaut, J., Darvizeh, Z., Elguea, S., Sowden, S., & Soni, D. (1998). A cross-cultural study of young children’s mapping abilities. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 23, 269–277.
Blaut, J. M. (1997). The mapping abilities of young children: Children can. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 87(1), 152–158.
Blaut, J. M., & Stea, D. (1974). Mapping at the age of three. Journal of Geography, 73, 5–9.
Blaut, J. M., McCleary, G. S., & Blaut, A. S. (1970). Environmental mapping in young children. Environment and Behavior, 2, 335–349.
Bugs, G., Granell, C., Fonts, O., Huerta, J., & Painho, M. (2010). An assessment of public participation GIS and Web 2.0 technologies in urban planning practice in Canela, Brazil. Cities, 27(3), 172–181.
Buras, K. L. (2009). ‘We have to tell our story’: Neo-griots, racial resistance, and schooling in the other south. Race, Ethnicity and Education, 12(4), 427–453.
Cahill, C. (2007). Doing research with young people: Participatory research and the rituals of collective work. Children’s Geographies, 5(3), 297–312.
Cahill, C., Rios-Moore, I., & Threatts, T. (2008). Different eyes/open eyes: Community-based participatory action research. In J. Cammarota & M. Fine (Eds.), Revolutionizing education: Youth participatory action research in motion (pp. 89–124). New York: Routledge.
Cammarota, J., & Fine, M. (2008). Youth participatory action research: A pedagogy for transformational resistance. In J. Cammarota & M. Fine (Eds.), Revolutionizing education: Youth participatory action research in motion (pp. 1–54). New York: Routledge.
Chapin, M., Lamb, Z., & Threlkeld, B. (2005). Mapping indigenous lands. Annual Review of Anthropology, 34, 619–638.
Craig, W., Harris, T., & Weiner, D. (2002). Community participation and geographic information systems. New York: Taylor and Francis.
De Barros, P. (1993). Jackson street after hours: The roots of jazz in Seattle. Seattle: Sasquatch Books.
Driver, F. (2001). Geography militant: Cultures of exploration and empire. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Edney, M. (1997). Mapping an empire: The geographic construction of British India, 1765–1843. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Eley, G. (1992). Nations, publics and political cultures: Placing Habermas in the nineteenth century. In C. Calhoun (Ed.), Habermas and the public sphere (pp. 289–339). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Elwood, S. (2006). Beyond cooptation or resistance: Urban spatial politics, community organizations, and GIS-based spatial narratives. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 96(2), 323–341.
Elwood, S. (2008). Volunteered geographic information: Future research directions motivated by critical, participatory, and feminist GIS. GeoJournal, 72(3), 173–183.
Elwood, S., & Mitchell, K. (2012). Mapping children’s politics: Spatial stories, dialogic relations and political formation. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 94(1), 1–15.
Fiedler, R., Schuurman, N., & Hyndman, J. (2006). Hidden homelessness in greater Vancouver. Cities, 23(3), 205–216.
Fraser, N. (1989). What’s critical about critical theory? The case of Habermas and gender. In N. Fraser (Ed.), Unruly practices: Power, discourse and gender in contemporary social theory (pp. 113–143). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Fraser, N. (1990). Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to actually existing democracy. Social Text, 25(26), 56–80.
Gaudelli, W., & Heilman, E. (2009). Reconceptualizing geography as democratic global citizenship education. Teachers College Record, 111(11), 2647–2677.
Gillespie, C. (2010). How culture constructs our sense of neighborhood: Mental maps and children’s perceptions of place. Journal of Geography, 109(1), 18–29.
Grant, C. A. (2011). Escaping Devil’s Island: Confronting racism, learning history. Race, Ethnicity and Education, 14(1), 33–40.
Harley, J. B. (1989). Deconstructing the map. Cartographica, 26(2), 1–20.
Harris, L., & Hazen, H. (2006). Power of maps: (Counter) mapping for conservation. ACME: An international e-journal for critical geographies, 4(1), 99–130.
Jordan, G. (2002). GIS for community forestry user groups in Nepal: Putting people before the technology. In W. Craig, T. Harris, & D. Weiner (Eds.), Community participation and geographic information systems (pp. 232–245). New York: Taylor and Francis.
Kindon, S., Pain, R., & Kresby, M. (2008). Participatory action research approaches and methods: Connecting people, participation, and place. London: Routledge.
Kwaku Kyem, P. (2002). Promoting local community participation in forest management through a PPGIS application in Southern Ghana. In W. Craig, T. Harris, & D. Weiner (Eds.), Community participation and geographic information systems (pp. 218–231). New York: Taylor and Francis.
Landau, B. (1986). Early map use as an unlearned ability. Cognition, 22, 201–223.
Leinhardt, G., Stainton, C., & Bausmith, J. (1998). Constructing maps collaboratively. Journal of Geography, 97, 19–30.
Liben, L. (2002). Spatial development in childhood: Where are we now? In U. Goswami (Ed.), Blackwell handbook of childhood cognitive development (pp. 326–348). Oxford: Blackwell.
Liben, L., & Downs, R. (1997). Can-ism and can’t-ianism: A straw child. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 87, 159–167.
Lo, J., Chang, C.-J., Tu, H.-H., & Yeh, S.-W. (2009). Applying GIS to develop a web-based spatial-person-temporal history educational system. Computers & Education, 53(1), 155–168.
McMaster, R., Leitner, H., & Sheppard, E. (1997). GIS-based environmental equity and risk assessment: Methodological problems and prospects. Cartography and Geographic Information Systems, 24(3), 172–189.
Owen, D. (2003). Collaborative electronic map creation in a UK 5-11 primary school: Children’s representation of local space and the role of peer and teacher scaffolding in this process. Proceedings of the 21st international cartographic conference, International Cartographic Association, 10–16 Aug, Durban.
Parker, B. (2006). Constructing community through maps? Power and praxis in community mapping. The Professional Geographer, 58(4), 470–484.
Parker, W. C. (2008). Knowing and doing in democratic citizenship education. In L. Levstik & C. Tyson (Eds.), Handbook of research in social studies education (pp. 65–80). New York: Routledge.
Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1956). The child’s conception of space. London: Routledge.
Piaget, J., Inhelder, B., & Szeminska, A. (1960). The child’s conception of geometry. London: Routledge.
Rabasa, J. (1995). Allegories of Atlas. In B. Ashcroft, G. Griffiths, & H. Tiffin (Eds.), The post-colonial studies reader (pp. 358–364). London: Routledge.
Ramasubramanian, L. (2008). PPGIS as critical reflective practice. In L. Ramasubramanian (Ed.), Geographic information science and public participation: Advances in geographic information science (pp. 135–149). Berlin: Springer.
Ryan, M. (1992). Gender and public access: Women’s politics in nineteenth-century America. In C. Calhoun (Ed.), Habermas and the public sphere (pp. 259–288). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Schmidt, S. J. (2011). Making space for the citizen in geographic education. Journal of Geography, 110(3), 107–119.
Sparke, M. (1998). A map that roared and an original atlas: Canada, cartography, and the narration of nation. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 88(3), 464–495.
Stoltman, J. (1990). Geography education for citizenship. Boulder: ERIC Clearinghouse for Social Studies/Social Science Education.
Tate, W. F., & Hogrebe, M. (2011). From visuals to vision: Using GIS to inform civic dialogue about African American males. Race, Ethnicity and Education, 14(1), 51–71.
Tshibalo, A. (2003). Cooperative learning as a strategy to improve the teaching of mapwork to grade 11 and 12 geography learners. Proceedings of the 21st international cartographic conference. International Cartographic Association, 10–16 Aug, Durban.
Vygotsky, L. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Wiegand, P. (2002a). School students’ mental representations of thematic point symbol maps. The Cartographic Journal, 39, 125–136.
Wiegand, P. (2002b). Analysis of discourse in collaborative cartographic problem solving. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 11, 138–158.
Wiegand, P. (2006). Learning and teaching with maps. London: Routledge.
Wood, D. (1993). The power of maps. New York: Guilford.
Young, J., & Gilmore, M. P. (2013). The spatial politics of affect and emotion in participatory GIS. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 103(4), 808–823.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this entry
Cite this entry
Mitchell, K., Elwood, S. (2015). Counter-Mapping for Social Justice. In: Kallio, K., Mills, S., Skelton, T. (eds) Politics, Citizenship and Rights. Geographies of Children and Young People, vol 7. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4585-94-1_19-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4585-94-1_19-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Online ISBN: 978-981-4585-94-1
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Social SciencesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences