Abstract
Recently, movement-inspired methods have become more popular among researchers examining the relationships between space, children, and young people. In particular, some have seen mobile interviewing as a suitable method to provide insights into participants’ everyday lives and involve them in the production of research material. While there is great potential in this method, the difficulties that come along with this are less discussed. This chapter suggests that doing interviews in movement involves ethical complexities that may not be evident in “sedentary” methods. In particular, the chapter discusses the difficulties that emerge in the research project when interviews are conducted in movement, by taking a look at (a) the dilemmas that movement brings, and (b) the problematic encounters that may take place during mobile interviews. It seems that when interviewing is mobile, the research setting is less controllable and ethical problems may develop. This chapter evaluates how movement influences the interaction and discusses how a researcher can deal with difficult situations. This chapter explores ethical problems and their possible solutions through four illustrations from research practice and a research diary.
References
Aitken, S. C. (2001). Global crises of childhood: Rights, justice and the unlike child. Area, 33(2), 119–127.
Anderson, J. (2004). Talking whilst walking: A geographical archaeology of knowledge. Area, 36(3), 254–261.
Bachman, V. (2011). Participating and observing: Positionality and fieldwork relations during Kenya’s post-election crisis. Area, 43(3), 362–368.
Barker, J., Kraftl, P., Horton, J., & Tucker, F. (2009). The road less travelled – new directions in children’s and young people’s mobility. Mobilities, 4(1), 1–10.
Brown, L., & Durrheim, K. (2009). Different kinds of knowing. Generating qualitative data through mobile interviewing. Qualitative Inquiry, 15(5), 911–930.
Buliung, R., Sultana, S., & Faulkner, G. (2012). Guest editorial: Special section on child and youth mobility – Current research and nascent themes. Journal of Transport Geography, 20(1), 31–33.
Bushin, N. (2007). Interviewing with children in their homes: Putting ethical principles into practice and developing flexible techniques. Children’s Geographies, 5(3), 235–251.
Carpiano, R. M. (2009). Come take a walk with me: The ‘go-along’ interview as a novel method for studying the implications of place for health and well-being. Health & Place, 15(1), 263–272.
Cele, S. (2006). Communicating place: Methods for understanding children’s experience of place. Stockholm: Acta Universitatis Stockholmiensis.
Dennis, S. F., Jr., Gaulocher, S., Carpiano, R. M., & Brown, D. (2009). Participatory photomapping (PPM): Exploring and integrated method health and place research with young people. Health & Place, 15(2), 466–473.
Edensor, T. (2014). Rhythm and arrhythmia. In P. Adey, D. Bissell, K. Hannam, P. Merriman, & M. Sheller (Eds.), The routledge handbook of mobilities (pp. 163–171). London: Routledge.
Eldén, S. (2013). Inviting the messy: Drawing methods and ‘children’s voices’. Childhood, 20(66), 68–81.
England, K. V. L. (1994). Getting personal: Reflexivity, positionality, and feminist research. Professional Geographer, 46(1), 80–89.
Ergler, C. R. (2012). The power of play: A bourdieusian analysis of seasonal outdoor play practices in Auckland children’s geographies. Auckland: University of Auckland.
Evans, J., & Jones, P. (2011). The walking interview: Methodology, mobility and place. Applied Geography, 31(2), 849–858.
Gallagher, M. (2008). ‘Power is not an evil’: Rethinking power in participatory methods. Children’s Geographies, 6(2), 137–150.
Garcia, C. M., Eisenberg, M. E., Frerich, E. A., Lechner, K. E., & Lust, K. (2012). Conducting go-along interviews to understand context and promote health. Qualitative Health Research, 22(10), 1395–1403.
Guillemin, M., & Gillam, L. (2004). Ethics, reflexivity, and ‘Ethically Important Moments’ in research. Qualitative Inquiry, 10(2), 261–280.
Hadfield-Hill, S., & Horton, J. (2014). Children’s experiences of participating in research: Emotional moments together? Children’s Geographies, 12(2), 1–19.
Hall, T. (2009). Footwork: Moving and knowing in local space(s). Qualitative Research, 9(5), 571–585.
Hannam, K., Sheller, M., & Urry, J. (2006). Editorial: Mobilities, immobilities and moorings. Mobilities, 1(1), 1–22.
Holt, L. (2004). The ‘Voices’ of children: De-centring empowering research relations. Children’s Geographies, 2(1), 13–27.
Holton, M., & Riley, M. (2014). Talking on the move: Place-based interviewing with undergraduate students. Area, 46(1), 59–65.
Jansson, D. (2010). The head vs. the gut: Emotions, positionality, and the challenges. Geoforum, 41(1), 19–22.
Kullman, K. (2010). Transitional geographies: Making mobile children. Social & Cultural Geography, 11(8), 829–846.
Kullman, K. (2012). Experiment with moving children and digital cameras. Children’s Geographies, 10(1), 1–16.
Kusenbach, M. (2003). Street phenomenology. The go-along as ethnographic research tool. Ethnography, 4(3), 455–485.
Kusenbach, M. (2012). Mobile methods. In S. Delamont (Ed.), Handbook of qualitative research in education (pp. 252–264). Massachusetts: Edwar Elgar Publishing.
Langevang, T. (2007). Movements in time and space: Using multiple methods in research with young people in Accra, Ghana. Children’s Geographies, 5(3), 267–281.
Marcus, G. E. (1995). Ethnography in/of the world system. The emergence of multi-sited ethnography. Annual Review of Antropology, 24, 95–117.
McDowell, L. (1992). Doing gender: Feminism, feminists and research methods in human geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 17(4), 399–416.
Moser, S. (2008). Personality: A new positionality? Area, 40(3), 383–392.
Porter, G., Hampshire, K., Abane, A., Robson, E., Munthali, A., Mashiri, M., & Tanle, A. (2010a). Moving young lives: Mobility, immobility and inter-generational tensions in urban Africa. Geoforum, 41(5), 796–804.
Porter, G., Hampshire, K., Abane, A., Munthali, A., Robson, E., Mashiri, M., & Maponya, G. (2010b). Where dogs, ghosts and lions roam: Learning from mobile ethnographies on the journey from school. Children’s Geographies, 8(2), 91–105.
Punch, S. (2002). Interviewing strategies with young people: The ‘Secret Box’, stimulus material and task-based activities. Children & Society, 16(1), 45–56.
Punch, S. (2012). Hidden struggles of fieldwork. Exploring the role and use of field diaries. Emotion, Space and Society, 5(2), 86–93.
Pyyry, N. (2015). ‘Sensing with’ photography and ‘Thinking with’ photographs in research into teenage girls’ hanging out. Children’s Geographies, 13(2), 149–163.
Raevaara, L. (2010). Nuorisotalolla tutkimassa nuorten kielenkäyttöä. In H. Lagström, T. Pösö, N. Rutanen, & K. Vehkalahti (Eds.), Lasten ja nuorten tutkimuksen etiikka (pp. 89–90). Helsinki: Nuorisotutkimuseura.
Robson, E., Poster, G., Hampshire, K., & Bourdillon, M. (2009). ‘Doing it Right?’: Working with young researchers in Malawi to investigate children, transport and mobility. Children’s Geographies, 7(4), 467–480.
Ross, N. J., Renold, S., Holland, E., & Hillman, A. (2009). Moving stories: Using mobile methods to explore the everyday lives of young people in public care. Qualitative Research, 9(5), 605–623.
Sheller, M., & Urry, J. (2006). The new mobilities paradigm. Environment and Planning A, 38(2), 207–226.
Sime, D. (2008). Ethical and methodological issues in engaging young people living in poverty with participatory research methods. Children’s Geographies, 6(1), 63–78.
Skelton, T. (2008). Research with children and young people: Exploring the tensions between ethics, competence and participation. Children’s Geographies, 6(1), 21–36.
Tani, S. (2014). The right to be seen, the right to be shown: Ethical issues regarding the geographies of hanging out. Young, 22(4), 361–379.
Trell, E. M., & Van Hoven, B. (2010). Making sense of place: Exploring creative and (inter) active research methods with young people. Fennia, 188(2), 91–104.
United Nations. (1989). Convention on the rights of the child. New York: United Nations.
Urry, J. (2007). Mobilities. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this entry
Cite this entry
Ponto, H. (2015). Ethical Complexities of Mobile Interviews with Young People. In: Evans, R., Holt, L., Skelton, T. (eds) Methodological Approaches. Geographies of Children and Young People, vol 2. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4585-89-7_2-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4585-89-7_2-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Online ISBN: 978-981-4585-89-7
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Social SciencesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences