Abstract
Well-being is historically conceptualized in vague terms related to psychosocial variables and researched through the absence of poor health outcomes, including anxiety, depression, suicide risk, and poor overall mental health. However, recently, there has been a shift in the literature so that wellness scholarship includes basic rights and access to factors associated with mental health. The World Health Organization (2011) considers mental health synonymous with a state of “wellbeing, in which every individual realizes his or her own potential, can cope with the normal stresses of life, can work productively and fruitfully, and is able to make a contribution to her or his community.” While this definition begins to hint at the historical, political, economic, and other sociocultural systems that profoundly affect a person’s wellness, it continues to neglect the co-constitutive elements of a person in context. A co-constitutive understanding acknowledges and emphasizes a relational dynamic that includes the productive interactions between people, culture, and the various social and physical places and spaces they at once shape and inhabit. This predominant and limited understanding is particularly pronounced when considering young people’s well-being. Developmental theories are frequently conceptualized in sequential, linear, decontextualized ways. Moreover, developmental processes are often understood as static, predetermined, and staged accomplishments that are linked in a de facto way to future prospects. Through this developmental perspective, young people are often understood non-relationally or through a series of dichotomies separating, for example, individual from society and person from place; youths are often characterized as passive non-agents: as dependent recipients or receptors of culture, history, and education or as victims of poverty, racism, class, etc. This dominant developmental perspective obscures young people’s active roles in their life endeavors, their abilities to impact the very contexts that shape them, and their potential to reimagine their possible futures. This blind spot not only limits our understanding of the dynamic systems involved in youth well-being but hides from view the powerful impact young people are making in their own worlds as they at once create and are created by the places they live in and through. In this chapter, we reconsider youth well-being as a fluid, dynamic, and relational process that is constituted by and through historical, political, economic, physical, and social geographies. The chapter illustrates this process through examples from the lives of indigenous young people in New York City, NY, rural subarctic Canada, and a remote village in Alaska, USA.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Armstrong, M. I., Birnie-Lefcovitch, S., & Ungar, M. T. (2005). Pathways between social support, family well being, quality of parenting, and child resilience: What we know. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 14(2), 269–281.
Barber, B. K. (2013). Annual research review: The experience of youth with political conflict – Challenging notions of resilience and encouraging research refinement. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 54, 461–473.
Benson, P. L. (2002). Adolescent development in social and community context: A program of research. New directions for youth development,2002(95), 123–148
Benson, P. L., Scales, P. C., Hamilton, S. F., & Sesma, A. (2006). Positive youth development: Theory, research, and applications. In R. M. Lerner & W. Damon (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 1: Theoretical models of human development (6th ed., pp. 894–941). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Bruner, J. S. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Burch, E. S. (2006). Social life in northwest alaska. Fairbanks: University of Alaska Press.
Cameron, E., Mathers, J., & Parry, J. (2006). ‘Health and well-being’: Questioning the use of health concepts in public health policy and practice. Critical Public Health, 16(4), 347–354. doi:10.1080/09581590601128166.
Castells, M. (2004). The power of identity, the information age: Economy, society and culture (Vol. 2). Oxford: Blackwell.
Chen, H., Cohen, P., Kasen, S., Gordan, K., Dufur, R., & Smailes, E. (2004). Construction and validation of a quality of life instrument for young adults. Quality of Life Research, 13(4), 747–759.
Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Cole, M., & Engestrom, Y. (1993). A cultural-historical approach to distributed cognition. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognition (pp. 1–46). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Eccles, J., & Gootman, J. A. (2002). Committee on Community-Level Programs for Youth Community programs to promote youth development (National Research Council & Institute of Medicine, Eds.). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Edwards, L. (2003). Promoting young people’s wellbeing: A review of research on emotional health. Glasgow: The SCRE Centre, Faculty of Education, University of Glasgow.
Eglinton, K. A. (2013). Youth identities, localities, and visual material culture: Making selves, making worlds (Vol. 25). Dordrecht: Springer.
Erikson, E. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. New York: Norton.
Gubrium, A., & Turner, K. C. N. (2011). Digital storytelling as an emergent method for social research and practice. In S. N. Hess-Biber (Ed.), Handbook of emergent technologies in social research (pp. 469–491). Oxford: Oxford University.
Jess, P., & Massey, D. (1995). The conceptualization of place. In D. Massey & P. Jess (Eds.), A place in the world? Places, cultures and globalization (pp. 45–85). Oxford: Oxford University Press/The Open University.
Lambert, J. (2006). Digital storytelling: Capturing lives, creating community. Berkeley: Life on the Water.
Lerner, R. M., Almerigi, J. B., Theokas, C., & Lerner, J. V. (2005). Positive youth development. Journal of Early Adolescence, 25(1), 10–16.
Levin, B. W., & Browner, C. H. (2005). The social production of health: Critical contributions from evolutionary, biological, and cultural anthropology. Social Science & Medicine, 61(4), 745–750.
Lewis, C., Enciso, P., & Moje, E. B. (2007). Introduction: Reframing sociocultural research on literacy. In C. Lewis, P. Enciso, & E. B. Moje (Eds.), Reframing sociocultural research on literacy: Identity, agency, and power (pp. 1–11). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Massey, D. (1993). Power-geometry and a progressive sense of place. In J. Bird, B. Curtis, T. Putnam, G. Robertson, & L. Tickner (Eds.), Mapping the futures: Local cultures, global change (pp. 59–69). London: Routledge.
Massey, D. (1998). The spatial construction of youth cultures. In T. Skelton & G. Valentine (Eds.), Cool places: Geographies of youth cultures (pp. 121–129). London: Routledge.
Rogoff, R., & Angelillo, C. (2002). Investigating the coordinated functioning of multifaceted cultural practices in human development. Human Development, 45(4), 211–225.
Rose, T. (1994). Black Noise: Rap Music and Black Culture in Contemporary America. Hanover: Wesleyan University Press: Published by University Press of New England.
Schulz, A., & Northridge, M. E. (2004). Social determinants of health: Implications for environmental health promotion. Health Education & Behavior, 31(4), 455–471.
Ungar, M. (2004). A constructionist discourse on resilience: Multiple contexts, multiple realities among at-risk children and youth. Youth & Society, 35(3), 341.
Ungar, M. (2011). The social ecology of resilience: Addressing contextual and cultural ambiguity of a nascent construct. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 81(1), 1–17.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Wertsch, J. (1995). The need for action in sociocultural research. In J. Wertsch, P. Del Rio, & A. Alvarez (Eds.), Sociocultural studies of mind (pp. 56–74). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wexler, L. (2013). Looking across three generation of Alaska Natives to explore how culture fosters indigenous resilience. Transcultural Psychiatry. doi:10.1177/1363461513497417.
Wexler, L. M., Eglinton, K. A., & Gubrium, A. (2012). Using digital stories to understand the lives of Alaska Native young people. Youth & Society. doi:10.1177/0044118X12441613.
World Health Organization (2011). State of wellbeing. http://www.who.int/features/factfiles/mental_health/en/
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this entry
Cite this entry
Wexler, L., Eglinton, K.A. (2015). Reconsidering Youth Well-Being as Fluid and Relational: A Dynamic Process at the Intersection of Their Physical and Social Geographies. In: Wyn, J., Cahill, H. (eds) Handbook of Children and Youth Studies. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4451-15-4_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4451-15-4_11
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-4451-14-7
Online ISBN: 978-981-4451-15-4
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and Law