Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Frontiers in Psychiatry pp 355–398Cite as

Theoretical Psychiatry as a Link Between Academic and Clinical Psychiatry

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology ((AEMB,volume 1192))

Abstract

From its beginning, psychiatry has been always characterized by different orientations in the forms of “schools”, “fields”, “branches”, etc., some of which were dominating during different periods of time. Today psychiatry seems to be in cul de sac of a serious scientific crisis and in the midst of the paradigm clashes. Academic psychiatry has been more and more criticized to be more or less irrelevant to clinical practice. The new field called theoretical psychiatry is fundamental for further scientific and professional maturation of psychiatry at the twenty-first century. Theoretical psychiatry pursues knowledge and understanding of mental disorders, and it operates so through the formulation, testing, and evaluation of theories. Digital revolution is changing significantly all fields of science, medicine, and psychiatry changing regimes and methods of knowledge production. Big data approach promises to provide the scientific holy grail in psychiatry, a single overarching theory or multiple theories and models that unify all the scientific disciplines. Brain is place where biological, psychological, social, and spiritual mechanisms meet each other and interact. Theoretical psychiatry should give all psychiatrists a common language, build bridges over academic gaps, and creatively export insights across disciplinary borders.

Nothing is as important as a good theory.

—Kurt Lewin

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Jakovljević M. Psychiatry at crossroad between crisis and new identity. Psychiatria Danubina. 2012;24(suppl 3):267–71.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kirmayer LJ, Lemelson R, Cummings C. Introduction: psychiatry at a crossroads. In: Kirmayer LJ, Lemelson R, Cummings C, editors. Re-visioning psychiatry: cultural phenomenology, critical neuroscience and global mental health. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2015. p. 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Jakovljevic M. Theoretical psychiatry: missing link between academic and clinical psychiatry for further scientific and professional maturation of psychiatry. Psychiatria Danubina 2013; 25:203–206.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Frances A, Carroll B. Barney Carroll: the conscience of psychiatry (obituaries). BMJ. 2018;362:k3016.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kleinman A. Rebalancing academic psychiatry: why it needs to happen—and soon. Brirish J Psychiatry. 2012;201:421–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kendler KS. The structure of psychiatric science. Am J Psychiatry. 2014;171:931–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Best S, Kellner D. Entropy, chaos and organism in postmodern science. In: Best S, Kellner S, editors. The postmodern turn. New York, London: The Guilford Press; 1997. p. 195–252.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jakovljevic M. The brave new psychiatry: beyond modernism, antimodernism and postmodernism in psychiatry. Psychiatria Danubina. 2007;19:122–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Jakovljević M. The brave new psychiatry: a pluralistic integrating transdisciplinary approach in theory and practice. Psychiatria Danubina. 2007;19:262–69.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jakovljevic M. Conceptual cacophony or different parts of a complex puzzle of mental disorders: transdisciplinary holistic integrative perspective. Psychiatria Danubina. 2011;23:232–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Feist GJ. The psychology of science and the origin of the scientific mind. New Haven, London: Yale University Press; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jakovljevic M. The decade of the brain in biological psychiatry—biological psychiatry between conservation and change. Psychiatria Danubina. 1995;7:75–87.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ioannidis JPA. Why most published research findings are false. PLOS Med. 2005;2:e124.A.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Ioannidis JPA. Why most published research findings are false. CHANCE. 2005;18:40–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Fanelli D. How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey data. PLOS ONE. 2009;4(5):e5738.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Boutron I, Dutton S, Ravaud P, Altman DG. Reporting and interpretation of randomized controlled trials with statistically nonsignificant results. JAMA. 2010;303:2058–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bowen A, Casadevall A. Increasing disparities between resource inputs and outcome, as measured by certain health deliverables, in biomedical research. PNAS. 2015;112:11335–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Ioannidis JPA. Why most clinical research is not useful. PLOS Med. 2016;13:e1002049.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Fullford KWMB, Thornton T, Graham G, editors. Oxford textbook of philosophy and psychiatry. New York: Oxford University Press; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kendler KS, Parnas J, editors. Philosophical issues in psychiatry—explanation, phenomenology, and nosology. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sackett DL, Rosenberg WMC, Muir Gray JA, Richards WS. Evidence-based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t? BMJ. 1996;312:71–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Jakovljevic M. Myths and facts in contemporary psychopharmacotherapy: evidence-based vs. evidence-biased treatment algorithms practice. Psychiatria Danubina 2007;19:342–9.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Isaacs D, Fitzgerald D. Seven alternatives to evidence-based medicine. BMJ. 1999;319:1618.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Drake RE. The principles of evidence-based mental health treatment. In: Drake RE, Merrens MR, Lynde DW, editors. Evidence-based mental health practice—a textbook. p. 45–65.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Dictionary Encharta Concise English. Student edition. London: Bloomsbury Publishing Inc; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  26. de Leon J. Is psychiatry scientific? A letter to a 21st century psychiatry resident. Psychiatry Investig. 2013;10:205–17.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Marshall M: Randomized controlled trials—misunderstanding, fraud and spon. In: Priebe S, Slade M, editors. Evidence in mental health care. Hove, New York: Brunner, Routledge; 2002. p. 59–71.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Mueser KT, Drake RE. How does a practice become evidence-based? In: Drake RE, Merrens MR, Lynde DW, editors. Evidence-based mental health practice—a textbook. New York, London: W.W. Norton & Company; 2005. p. 217–41.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Jakovljevic M. New generation vs. first generation antipsychotics debate: pragmatic clinical trials and practice-based evidence. Psychiatria Danubina 2009;21:446–52.

    Google Scholar 

  30. van Baalen, Boon M. An epistemiological shift: from evidence-based medicine to epistemological responsibility. J Eval Clin Pract. 2015;21:433–9.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Djulbegovic B, Guyatt GH, Ashcroft RE. Epistemologic inquiries in evidence-based medicine. Cancer Control. 2009;16:158–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Djulbegovic B, Guyatt GH. Progress in evidence-based medicine: a quarter century on. Lancet. 20017;390:415–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Kecmanović D. DSM-5: the more it changes the more it is the same. Psychiatria Danubina. 2013;25:94–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Slade M. The primacy of personal recovery. In: Slade M, editor. Personal recovery and mental illness—a guide for mental health professionals. Cambridge: University Press; 2011. p. 45–56.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Wakefield JC. Darwin, functional explanation, and the philosophy of psychiatry. In: Adriaens PR, De Block A, editors. Maladapting minds—philosophy, psychiatry and evolutionary theory. New York: Oxford University Press; 2011.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  36. Sims A. Neuroscience as belief. A Christian perspective. In: Cox J, Campbell AV, Fulford BKWM, editors. Medicine of the person—faith, science, and values in health care provision. London, Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley Publishers; 2007. p. 207–24.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Ferrer JN. Revisioning transpersonal theory—a participatory vision of human spirituality. New York: State University of New York; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Derry GN. What science is and how it works. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2002.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  39. Burke KL. Stop using the word pseudoscience. American Science; 2016. www.americanscientist.org.

  40. Kendler KS. Towards scientific psychiatric nosology: strengths and limitations. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1990;47:969–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Farmer A, McGuffin P, Williams J. Measuring psychopathology. New York: Oxford University Press; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Fullford KWMB, Thornton T, Graham G. Natural classifications, realism, and psychiatric science. In: Fullford KWMB, Thornton T, Graham G, editors. Oxford textbook of philosophy and psychiatry. New York: Oxford University Press; 2006. p. 316–83.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Vaughn L. Inference for the best explanation. In: Vaughn L, editor. The power of critical thinking—effective reasoning about ordinary and extraordinary claims. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008. p. 335–811.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Vaughn L. Judging scientific theories. In: Vaughn L, editor. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008. p. 382–441.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Stephan KE, Bach DR, Fletcher PC, Flint J, Frank MJ, Friston KJ, Heinz A, Huys QJM, Owen MJ, Binder EB, Dayan P, Johnstone EC, Meyer-Lindenberg A, Montague PR, Schnyder U, Wang XJ. Charting the landscape priority problems in psychiatry, part 1: classification and diagnosis. Lancet Psychiatry. 2016;3:77–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Weller MPI, Eysenck MW. Changing frontiers. In: Weller MPI, Eysenck MW, editors. The scientific basis of psychiatry, 2nd ed. London: W.B. Sounders Company Ltd; 1992. p. 3–38.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Tretter F. Philosophical aspects of neuropsychiatry. In: Tretter F, Gebicke-Haerter PJ, Mendoza ER, Winterer G, editors. Systems biology in psychiatric research—from high-throughput data to mathematical modeling. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA; 2010. p. 3–25.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Kuhn T. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Corsini R. The dictionary of psychology. Brunner/Mazel: Taylor & Francis Group; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Huck S. Defending science within reason. Between scientism and cynicism. NY: Amherst Prometeus Books; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Webster’s New World College Dictionary, 4th ed. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  52. The Oxford English Dictionary‚ 3rd ed. Oxford University Press; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Krickel B. The mechanical world—the meta physical commitments of the new mechanistic approach. Springer Nature Switzerland; 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Wikipedia: Metapsychiatry. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metapsychiatry.

  55. Kecmanovic D. Metapsihijatrija (Metapsychiatry). Clio, Beograd; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Wikipedia: Philosophy of mind. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metapsychiatry

  57. Bartlett SJ. Normality does not equal mental health—the need to look elsewhere for standards of good psychological health. Denver, Oxford: Praeger, Santa Barbara; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Priebe S, Burns T, Craig TKJ. The future of academic psychiatry may be social. Br J Psychiatry. 2013;202:319–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Kecmanović D. Conceptual discord in psychiatry: origin, implications and failed attempts to resolve it. Psychiatria Danubina. 2011;23:210–22.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Cloninger CR. Feeling good: the science of well-being. Oxford University Press; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Craddock N. Psychiatry needs its Higga boson moment. New Scientist. 2013;2914:29.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Gros C. Complex and adaptive dynamical systems: a primer. New York: Springer; 2013.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  63. Anderson WS, Kreiman G. Neuroscience: what we cannot model, we do not understand. Curr Biol. 2011;8:R123–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Jaccard J, Jacoby J. Theory construction and model-building skills—a practical guide for social scientiss. New York: The Guilford Press; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Senge PM. The fifth discipline: the art and practice of the learning organisation. London: Random House; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  66. De Bono E. Six thinking hats. London: Penguin Books Ltd.; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Sternberg R, Grigorenko E, Singer J. Creativity: from potential to realization. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2004.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  68. Ghaemi SN. The concepts of psychiatry: a pluralistic approach to the mind and mental illness. Baltimore, London: The John Hopkins University Press; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Kuhn T. The essential tension: selected studies in scientific tradition and change. Chicago: Univeresity Chicago Press; 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Auerswald EH. Family healing and planetary healing—three paradigm in search of a culture. In: Prosky PS, Keith DV, editors. Family therapy as ab alternative to medication—an appraisal of pharmaland. New York, Hove: Brunner-Routledge; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Lake J. Textbook of integrative mental health care. New York, Stuttgart: Thieme; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Tataryn D. Paradigms of health and disease: a framework for classifying and understanding complementary and alternative medicine. J Altern Complement Med. 2002:877–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Gallo FP. Energy psychology: explorations at the interface of energy, cognition, behavior, and health. London, New York, Washington, DC: CRC Press, Boca Raton; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Jakovljevic M, Brajkovic L, Jaksic N, Loncar M, Aukst-Margetic B, Lasic D. Posttraumatic stress disorders from different perspectives: a transdisciplinary approach. Psychiatria Danubina. 2012;24:246–55.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Tyrer P, Steinberg D. Models for mental disorders: conceptual models in psychiatry. 3rd ed. Chicester: Willey; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  76. McHugh PR, Slavne PR. The perspectives of psychiatry. 2nd ed. Baltimore, London: The John Hopkins University Press; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  77. WHO: Promoting mental health. Concepts, emerging evidence, practice (Summsry Report) Geneva, 2004 (Google Scholar).

    Google Scholar 

  78. Shives LR. Basic concepts of psychiatric-mentalhealth nursing. 8th ed. Philadelphia: Walters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams, Wikins; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Wakefield JC. The concept of mental disorder: on the boundary between biological facts and social values. Am Psychol. 1992;47:373–88.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. American Psychiatric Association (APA). Definition of a mental disorder. In: APA, editor. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. Fifth edition DSM-5. Washington, DC, London: American Psychiatric Publishing; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  81. WHO: mental disorders https://www.who.int.

  82. Glannon W. Research domain criteria: a final paradigm for psychiatry? Front Hum Neurosci. 2015;9:488. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00488.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  83. Carpenter WT Jr. How diagnosis of schizophrenia impeded the advance of knowledge (and what to do about it). In: Silverstein SM, Moghaddam B, Wykes T, editors. Schizophrenia: evolution and synthesis, 49–62. Cambridge Massachusetts: Struengmann Forum Reports. The MIT Press; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  84. Summerfield D. Cross-cultural perspective on the medicalization of human suffering. In: Rosen GM, editor. Post-traumatic stress disorder—issues and controversies. Willey; 2005. p. 233–45.

    Google Scholar 

  85. Thoits PA. Sociological approaches to mental illness. In: Horwitz AV, Shied TL, editors. A handbook for a study of mental health: social contexts, theories and systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1999. p. 121–38.

    Google Scholar 

  86. Herbert JD, Sageman M. “First do no harm”: emerging guidelines for the treatment of posttraumatic reactions. In: Rosen GM, editor. Post-traumatic stress disorder—issues and controversies. Willey; 2005. p. 213–32.

    Google Scholar 

  87. Shepard B. Risk factors and PTSD. In: Rosen GM, editor. Post-traumatic stress disorder—issues and controversies. Willey; 2005. p. 39–61.

    Google Scholar 

  88. Hilton C, Hilton M. Person in health care: Jewish approaches. In: Cox J, Campbell AV, Fulford BKWM, editors. Medicine of the person—faith, science, and values in health care provision. London, Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley Publishers; 2007. p. 96–109.

    Google Scholar 

  89. Okasha: The individual versus the family: an Islamic and traditional societies perspective. In: Cox J, Campbell AV, Fulford BKWM, editors. Medicine of the person—faith, science, and values in health care provision. London, Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley Publishers; 2007. p. 110–24.

    Google Scholar 

  90. Bhugra D. Hindu and Ayurvedic understanding s of the person. In: Cox J, Campbell AV, Fulford BKWM, editors. Medicine of the person—faith, science, and values in health care provision. London, Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley Publishers; 2007. p. 125–38.

    Google Scholar 

  91. Weller MPI, Peck DF. Personality. In: Weller MPI, Eysenck MW, editors. The scientific basis of psychiatry, 2nd ed. London: W.B. Sounders Company Ltd; 1992. p. 407–14.

    Google Scholar 

  92. Svrakic D, Divac-Jovanovic M. The fragmented personality: an integrative, dynamic, and personalized approach to personality disorder. New York: Oxford University Press; 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  93. Bhar SS, Kyrios M. The self concept: theory and research. In: Kyrios M, Moulding R, Doron G, Bhar SS, Nedeljkovic M, Mikulincer M, editors. The self in understanding and treating psychological disorders. UK: Cambridge University Press; 2016. p. 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  94. Kyrios M. The self in psychological disorders: an introduction. In: Kyrios M, Moulding R, Doron G, Bhar SS, Nedeljkovic M, Mikulincer M, editors. The self in understanding and treating psychological disorders. UK: Cambridge University Press; 2016. p. 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  95. Echezarraga A, Calvete E, Gonzalez-Pinto AM, Las Hayas C. Resilience dimensions and mental health outcomes in bipolar disorder in a follow up study. Stress Health. 2018;34:115–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Kalisch R, Mueller MB, Tuescher O. A conceptual framework for the neurobiological study of resilience. Behav Brain Sci. 2015;62:1–79.

    Google Scholar 

  97. Jakovljevic M. Placebo and nocebo phenomena from the perspective of evidence based and person centered medicine. Hosp Pharmacol Int Multidiscip J. 2017;4:512–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. Shrivastava A, De Sousa A, Sonavane S, Shah N. Resilience improves neurocognition and treatment outcomes in schizophrenia: a hypothesis. Open J Psychiatry. 2016;6:173–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Davidson JRT, Payne VM, Connor KM, Foa EB, Rothbaum BO, Hertzberg MA, Weisler RH. Trauma, resilience and saliostasis: effects of treatment in post-traumatic stress disorder. Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2005;20:43–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Bolos A. Considerations on assisted resilience and individualized therapy in bipolar affective disorder, with a clinical case exemplification. Clujul Medical. 2015;88:462–7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  101. Reivich KJ, Seligman MEP, McBride S. Master resilience training in the US army. Am Psychol. 2011;66:25–34.

    Google Scholar 

  102. Beck AT. Depression: clinical experimental and theoretical aspects. New York: Hoeber; 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  103. Orr SP, McNally RJ, Rosen G, Shalev AY. Psychophysiologic reactivity—implication for conceptualizing PTSD. In: Rosen GM, editor. Posttraumatic stress disorder—issues and controversies. Willey; 2005. p. 101–26.

    Google Scholar 

  104. Kirshenbaum M. Everything happens for a reason: finding the true meaning of the events in our lives; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  105. Bruene M. Textbook of evolutionary psychiatry. New York: Oxford University Press; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  106. Clark J. The Bible and medical practice. In: Cox J, Campbell AV, Fulford BKWM, editors. Medicine of the person—faith, science, and values in health care provision. London, Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley Publishers; 2007. p. 56–69.

    Google Scholar 

  107. Pfeifer HR, Cox J. The man and his message. In: Cox JM Campbell AV, Fullford BKWM, editors. Medicine of the person—faith, science and values in health care provision. London, Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley Publishers; 2007. p. 33–45.

    Google Scholar 

  108. Cox J, Verhagen PJ. Spirituality, religion and psychopathology: towards an integrative psychiatry. Int J Pers Cent Med. 2011;1:146–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  109. Sims A, Cook CCH. Spirituality in psychiatry. In: Cook C, Powell A, Sims A, editors. Spirituality and psychiatry. London: The Royal College of Psychiatrists; 2009. p. 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  110. Gilbert P. Spirituality and mental health: practical proposal for action. In: Cox J, Campbell AV, Fulford BKWM, editors. Medicine of the person—faith, science, and values in health care provision. London, Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley Publishers; 2007. p. 141–55.

    Google Scholar 

  111. Ellison CW. Spiritual well-being: conceptualization and measurement. J Psychol Theol. 1983;11:4.

    Google Scholar 

  112. Levin J. How faith heals: a theoretical model. EXPLORE (NY). 2009;5:77–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  113. Pargament KI. The psychology of religion and coping—theory, research and practice. New York, London: The Guilford Press; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  114. Jakovljevic M. Psychiatry and religion: from divide to dialog and creative synergism in the search for humanistic self and global mental health promotion. In: Kurjak A, Chervenak A, editors. McCullough LB, Hasanovic A, co-editors. Science and religion: synergy and scepticism. New Delhi, London, Panama: Jaypee the Health Sciences Publisher; 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  115. Jakovljevic M. Empathy, sense of coherence and resilience: bridging personal, public and global mental health and conceptual synthesis. Psychiatria Danubina. 2018;30:380–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  116. Lewis B. Narrative psychiatry—how stories can shape clinical practice. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  117. Hamkins SE. The art of narrative psychiatry. New York: Oxford University Press; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  118. Frank AW. The wounded story teller—body, illness and ethics. Chicago, London: The University of Chicago Press; 1995.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  119. Amendolia R. A narrative constructivist perspective of treatment of PTSD with Ericksonian hypnosis and EMDR. The American Academy of Experts in Academic Stres, Inc.; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  120. Kirmayer JK, Crafa D. What kind of science for psychiatry. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014;8:article 435, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00435.

  121. Jakovljevic M, Jakovljevic I. Theoretical psychiatry and transdisciplinary integrative approach: stepping stones to precision and person-centered psychiatry. In: Kim YK, editor. Research methods and interventions in psychiatry—artificial intelligence, precision medicine, and other paradigm shifts.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychiatry, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia

    Miro Jakovljevic & Ivan Jakovljevic

Authors
  1. Miro Jakovljevic
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ivan Jakovljevic
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Miro Jakovljevic .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. College of Medicine, Korea University, Seoul, Gyeonggi-do, Korea (Republic of)

    Yong-Ku Kim

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Jakovljevic, M., Jakovljevic, I. (2019). Theoretical Psychiatry as a Link Between Academic and Clinical Psychiatry. In: Kim, YK. (eds) Frontiers in Psychiatry. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol 1192. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9721-0_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation