Skip to main content

Preliminary Investigation of Critical Separation Distance Between Shacks in Informal Settlements Fire

  • Conference paper
The Proceedings of 11th Asia-Oceania Symposium on Fire Science and Technology (AOSFST 2018)

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Approximately, one billion people across the globe are currently living in informal shack settlements with a large potential fire risk. Due to the small distance between shacks, a single shack fire may spread and could cause a large area of informal settlement to be burnt in a short period of time. In this work, the critical fire separation distance between shacks is first discussed and determined using a simple physics-based theoretical model. Aerial photography within geographic information systems (GIS) is then employed to verify the calculated results based on a real informal settlement burn scar in Masiphumelele, Cape Town, South Africa. The radiative heat fluxes along the centerline of the shack window, at different distances, are calculated to estimate the ignition potential of combustible materials in adjacent shacks. Meanwhile, the potential fire risks, assuming separation distance as a proxy for risk, pre- and post- a known fire in Masiphumelele are obtained and compared. It was established that the heat flux would decay from around 100 kW/m2 within 0.5 m to the value smaller than 0.1 kW/m2 at the distance of 3.5 m away from the shack, which can be considered as a relatively safe distance. The theoretical result agrees well with the minimum effective distance of 3.3 m in real fires occurred in Masiphumelele. However, a GIS analysis of the informal settlement layout in 2015 and 2017 demonstrates that, if the critical fire separation distance is more than 3.0 m, 97% of the settlement could be at risk in a single fire incident. Therefore, more research is required to improve the understanding of fire spread mechanisms in informal settlements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Habitat, U. (2013). State of the world’s cities 2012/2013: Prosperity of cities, Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Walls, R., Olivier, G., & Eksteen, R. (2017). Informal settlement fires in South Africa: Fire engineering overview and full-scale tests on “shacks”. Fire Safety Journal, 91, 997–1006.

    Google Scholar 

  3. DMFRS. (2015). Western cape strategic framework for fire and burn injury prevention. In Western cape disaster management and fire rescue services.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Roberts, E. (2017). Migrants without shelter after fire destroys French refugee camp in CNN.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fire in Germany refugee shelter injures 37 in The Local de (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Walls, R., & Zweig, P. (2017). Towards sustainable slums: Understanding fire engineering in informal settlements. In Advanced technologies for sustainable systems (pp. 93–98). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Himoto, K., & Tanaka, T. (2008). Development and validation of a physics-based urban fire spread model. Fire Safety Journal, 43, 477–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Himoto, K., Tsuchihashi, T., Tanaka, Y., & Tanaka, T. (2009). Modeling thermal behaviors of window flame ejected from a fire compartment. Fire Safety Journal, 44, 230–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang, Y., & Rush, D. (2018). Determination of critical fallout condition of tempered glass in an enclosure fire. Fire Safety Journal, 101, 18–24.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Law, M., & O’Brien, T. (1989). Fire safety of bare external structural steel. Steel Construction Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Moradi, A. (2016). Fire spreading in South African low-cost settlements “A physics-based model”. Stellenbosch: Stellenbosch University.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Drysdale, D. (2011). An introduction to fire dynamics. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lee, S. W., & Davidson, R. A. (2010). Physics-based simulation model of post-earthquake fire spread. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 14, 670–687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang, Y., Wang, Q., Su, Y., Sun, J., He, L., & Liew, K. M. (2015). Fracture behavior of framing coated glass curtain walls under fire conditions. Fire Safety Journal, 75, 45–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bergman, T. L., Incropera, F. P., & Lavine, A. S. (2011). Fundamentals of heat and mass transfer. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wang, Y., Li, K., Su, Y., Lu, W., Wang, Q., Sun, J., et al. (2017). Determination of critical breakage conditions for double glazing in fire. Applied Thermal Engineering, 111, 20–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Cuzzillo, B. R., & Pagni, P. J. (1998). Thermal breakage of double-pane glazing by fire. Journal of Fire Protection Engineering, 9, 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Meth, P. (2017). Informal housing, gender, crime and violence: the role of design in Urban South Africa. The British Journal of Criminology, 57, 402–421.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Spearpoint, M. J., & Quintiere, J. G. (2001). Predicting the piloted ignition of wood in the cone calorimeter using an integral model—effect of species, grain orientation and heat flux. Fire Safety Journal, 36, 391–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Smith, W. K., & King, J. B. (1970). Surface temperatures of materials during radiant heating to ignition. Journal of Fire and Flammability, 1, 272–288.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Koo, E., Pagni, P. J., Weise, D. R., & Woycheese, J. P. (2010). Firebrands and spotting ignition in large-scale fires. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 19, 818–843.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by IRIS-Fire project of UK (Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council Grant no.: EP/P029582/1). Aerial photography was obtained from the City of Cape Town via the Open Data portal (https://web1.capetown.gov.za/web1/opendataportal/DatasetDetail?DatasetName=Aerial%20photography), however, the City of Cape Town does not warrant or guarantee the quality or accuracy of the data, accessed, extracted and/or used from this site.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yu Wang or David Rush .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Wang, Y., Gibson, L., Beshir, M., Rush, D. (2020). Preliminary Investigation of Critical Separation Distance Between Shacks in Informal Settlements Fire. In: Wu, GY., Tsai, KC., Chow, W.K. (eds) The Proceedings of 11th Asia-Oceania Symposium on Fire Science and Technology. AOSFST 2018. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9139-3_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9139-3_28

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-32-9138-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-32-9139-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics