Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Drivers and Consequences in Transforming Work Practices

  • Chapter
The Impact of ICT on Work

Abstract

As information revolution progresses at unprecedented pace, it has been predicted that the current paradigm of work established by industrial technology will be changing taking advantage of capabilities provided by information and communication technologies (ICT). Telecommuting is one of the most cited examples and flexible time another one, brought up to our attention more than decades ago. With the rapid insurgence of smart devices connected to the Internet, the world imagined is now becoming reality. The working paradigm is undergoing tremendous changes as evidenced by proliferating new theories in different areas of business management. Though the work transformation has been expected and envisioned for a while, the world is facing serious challenges in identifying and adapting to the novel characteristics of new ways of working, along with unanticipated side effects.

In this study, a systematic literature review of academic studies was conducted in order to identify constructs involved in realizing this new way of working incurred by ICT. Using keyword search related to work transformation such as telecommuting and flextime, total 913 research articles were selected from academic databases. Initial content analysis of these 913 articles revealed 372 variables related to work transformation; 13 sessions of focus group by different panels of experts were conducted reviewing real meanings and context of these constructs, removing duplicates and grouping similar variables. As a result, total of 37 variables were finalized as critically related to the work transformation; 16 were found to be at the individual level, 15 at the organizational level, and 6 at the society level. These variables are framed into a series of relational diagrams depicting possible drivers and consequences of transforming work practices. Suggestions are made for the use of these frameworks, and implications are discussed with limitations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abdel-Wahab AG (2007) Employees’ attitudes towards telecommuting. An empirical investigation in the Egyptian Governorate of Dakahlia. Behav Inf Technol 26(5):367–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albion MJ (2004) A measure of attitudes towards flexible work options. Aust J Manag 29(2):275–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alkadi I, Alkadi G, Totaro M (2003) Effects of information technology on the business world. Hum Res Manag 22(3):99–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews AB et al (2004) Public perceptions about father involvement: results of a statewide household survey. J Fam Issues 25(5):603–633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson C, Hall L (2009) The role of gender in varying forms of flexible working. Gend Work Organ 16(6):650–666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett RC et al (2004) Unintended consequences of job redesign. Community Work Fam 7(2):227–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beauregard TA (2011) Direct and indirect links between organizational work-home culture and employee well-being. Br J Manag 22(2):218–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belanger F, Collins RW (1998) Distributed work arrangements: a research framework. Inf Soc 14(2):137–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belanger F, Collins RW, Cheney PH (2001) Technology requirements and work group communication for telecommuters. Inf Syst Res 12(2):155–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blair-Loy M (2009) Work without end? Scheduling flexibility and work-to-family conflict among stockbrokers. Work Occup 36(4):279–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blomme RJ, Van Rheede A, Tromp DM (2010) Work-family conflict as a cause for turnover intentions in the hospitality industry. Tour Hosp Res 10(4):269–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogdanski C, Setliff RJ (2000) Leaderless supervision: a response to Thomas. Hum Res Dev Q 11(2):197–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosch-Sijtsema P (2007) The impact of individual expectations and expectation conflicts on virtual teams. Group Organ Manag 32(3):358–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandth B, Kvande E (2001) Flexible work and flexible fathers. Work Employ Soc 15(2):251–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Branine M (1999) Part-time work in the public health service of Denmark, France and the UK. Int J Hum Res Manage 10(3):411–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Branine M (2004) Job sharing and equal opportunities under the new public management in local authorities. Int J Public Sect Manag 17(2):136–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bratu C (2009) Homework -- an Expression of Flexi-Security of Work Relations. Munca la domiciliu -- expresie a flexi-securităţii relaţiilor de muncă 61(4):81–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Brey P (1999) Worker autonomy and the drama of digital networks in organizations. J Bus Ethics 22(1):15–25

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Brown AJ, Swinyard W, Ogle J (2003) Women in academic medicine: a report of focus groups and questionnaires, with conjoint analysis. J Womens Health 12(10):999–1008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cappelli P, Neumark D (2004) External churning and internal flexibility: evidence on the functional flexibility and core-periphery hypotheses. Ind Relat 43(1):148–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cascio WF, Shurygailo S (2003) E-Leadership and virtual teams. Organ Dyn 31(4):362–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damarin AK (2006) Rethinking occupational structure. Work Occup 33(4):429–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Cuyper N et al (2009) Organizations’ use of temporary employment and a climate of job insecurity among Belgian and Spanish permanent workers. Econ Ind Democr 30(4):564–591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dex S, Scheibl F (2001) Flexible and family-friendly working arrangements in UK-based SMEs: business cases. Br J Ind Relat 39(3):411–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eldridge D, Nisar TM (2006) The significance of employee skill in flexible work organizations. Int J Hum Res Manage 17(5):918–937

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fay SJ (1993) The rise and fall of tagging as a criminal justice measure in Britain. Int J Sociol Law 21(4):301–317

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Fay MJ, Kline SL (2011) Coworker relationships and informal communication in high-intensity telecommuting. J Appl Commun Res 39(2):144–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fish LA, Fish LA (2010) Career expectations and perceptions of part-time MBA students. Coll Stud J 44(3):706–719

    Google Scholar 

  • Gajendran RS, Harrison DA (2007) The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting: meta-analysis of psychological mediators and individual consequences. J Appl Psychol 92(6):1524–1541

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Geurts S et al (2009) Worktime demands and work-family interference: does worktime control buffer the adverse effects of high demands? J Bus Ethics 84:229–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giannikis SK, Mihail DM (2011) Flexible work arrangements in Greece: a study of employee perceptions. Int J Hum Res Manage 22(2):417–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gittell JH (2000) Organizing work to support relational co-ordination. Int J Hum Res Manage 11(3):517–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golden TD (2006) The role of relationships in understanding telecommuter satisfaction. J Organ Behav 27(3):319–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golden TD, Veiga JF, Dino RN (2008) The impact of professional isolation on teleworker job performance and turnover intentions: does time spent teleworking, interacting face-to-face, or having access to communication-enhancing technology matter? J Appl Psychol 93(6):1412–1421

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goleden TD, Veiga JF, Simsek Z (2006) Telecommuting’s differential impact on work-family conflict: is there no place like home? J Appl Psychol 91(6):1340–1350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golembiewski RT, Proehl CW Jr (1978) A survey of the empirical literature on flexible workhours: character and consequences of a major innovation. Acad Manage Rev 3(4):837–853

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman WB, Crouter AC (2009) Longitudinal associations between maternal work stress, negative work-family spillover, and depressive symptoms. Fam Relat 58(3):245–258

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grönlund A (2007a) Employee control in the era of flecibility: a stress buffer or a stress amplifier? Eur Soc 9(3):409–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grönlund A (2007b) More control, less conflict? Job demand–control, gender and work–family conflict. Gend Work Organ 14(5):476–497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grosswald B, Ragland D, Fisher JM (2001) Critique of U.S. work/family programs and policies. J Progress Hum Serv 12(1):65–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Guelzow MG, Bird GW, Koball EH (1991) An exploratory path analysis of the stress process for dual-career men and women. J Marriage Fam 53(1):151–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guerrier Y, Lockwood AJ (1989) Managing flexible working in hotels. Serv Ind J 9(3):406–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall L, Atkinson C (2006) Improving working lives: flexible working and the role of employee control. Employ Relat 28(4):374–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammer LB, Barbera KM (1997) Toward an integration of alternative work. Hum Res Plan 20(2):28–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardill I, Green A (2003) Remote working—Altering the spatial contours of work and home in the new economy. N Technol Work Employ 18(3):212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hicks WD, Klimoski RJ (1981) The impact of flextime on employee attitudes. Acad Manage J 24(2):333–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hohl KL (1996) The effects of flexible work arrangements. Nonprofit Manag Leadersh 7(1):69–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes EL, Parkes KR (2007) Work hours and well-being: the roles of work-time control and work-family interference. Work Stress 21(3):264–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson J (2004) Flexible working: changing the manager’s role. Manag Decis 42(6):721–737

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kashefi M (2007) Work flexibility and its individual consequences. Can J Sociol 32(3):341–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelliher C, Anderson D (2008) For better or for worse? An analysis of how flexible working practices influence employees’ perceptions of job quality. Int J Hum Res Manage 19(3):419–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konradt U, Hertel G, Schmook R (2003) Quality of management by objectives, task-related stressors, and non-task-related stressors as predictors of stress and job satisfaction among teleworkers. Eur J Work Organ Psychol 12(1):61–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurland NB, Egan TD (1999) Telecommuting: justice and control in the virtual organization. Organ Sci 10(4):500–513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee MD, MacDermid SM, Buck ML (2000) Organizational paradigms of reduced-load work: accomodation, elaboration, and transformation. Acad Manage J 43(6):1211–1226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee MD et al (2002) Contextual factors in the success of reduced-load work arrangements among managers and professionals. Hum Resour Manage 41(2):209–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee H, Shin B, Higa K (2007) Telework vs. Central work: a comparative view of knowledge accessibility. Decis Support Syst 43(3):687–700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonardi PM, Treem JW, Jackson MH (2010) The connectivity paradox: using technology to both decrease and increase perceptions of distance in distributed work arrangements. J Appl Commun Res 38(1):85–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu H et al (2011) Non-standard work schedules, work–family conflict and parental well-being: a comparison of married and cohabiting unions. Soc Sci Res 40(2):473–484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyness KS, Kropf MB (2005) The relationships of national gender equality and organizational support with work-family balance: a study of European managers. Hum Relat 58(1):33–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacEachen E, Polzer J, Clarke J (2008) “You are free to set your own hours”: governing worker productivity and health through flexibility and resilience. Soc Sci Med 66(5):1019–1033

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mamaghani F (2006) Impact of information technology on the workforce of the future: an analysis. Int J Manag 23(4):845–850

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann S, Holdsworth L (2003) The psychological impact of teleworking: stress, emotions and health. N Technol Work Employ 18(3):196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manoochehri G, Pinkerton T (2003) Managing telecommuters: opportunities and challenges. Am Bus Rev 21(1):9–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Michie J, Sheehan-Quinn M (2001) Labour market flexibility, human resource management and corporate performance. Br J Manag 12(4):287–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moen P, Kelly E, Huang R (2008) ‘Fit’ inside the work-family black box: an ecology of the life course, cycles of control reframing. J Occup Organ Psychol 81(3):411–433

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Molleman E, Slomp J (1999) Functional flexibility and team performance. Int J Prod Res 37(8):1837–1858

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan P, Allington N (2002) Has the public sector retained its ‘Model Employer’ status? Public Money Manag 22(1):35–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munroe F (2007) Managing privacy and security compliance. J Health Care Compliance 9(1):69–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Narayanan VK, Nath R (1982a) A field testing of some attitudinal and behavioral consequences of flexitime. J Appl Psychol 67(2):214–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narayanan VK, Nath R (1982b) Hierarchical level and the impact of flextime. Ind Rel 21(2):216–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nybø G (2004) Personnel development for dissolving jobs: towards a competency-based approach? Int J Hum Res Manage 15(3):549–564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Leary MB, Mortensen M (2010) Go (Con)figure: subgroups, imbalance, and isolates in geographically dispersed teams. Organ Sci 21(1):115–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson MH (1983) Remote office work: changing work patterns in space and time. Commun ACM 26(3):182–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill TA et al (2009) Predicting teleworker success: an exploration of personality, motivational, situational, and job characteristics. N Technol Work Employ 24(2):144–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly J (1992) Banking on flexibility: a comparison of the use of flexible employment strategies in the retail banking sector in Britain and France. Int J Hum Res Manage 3(1):35–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ory DT et al (2004) When is commuting desirable to the individual? Growth Chang 35(3):334–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pitt-Catsouphes M, Sano J, Matz-Costa C (2009) Unions’ responsiveness to the aging of the workforce. J Workplace Behav Health 24(1/2):125–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podnar K, Golob U (2010) Friendly flexible working practices within the internal marketing framework: a service perspective. Serv Ind J 30(11):1773–1786

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polach J (2003) HRD’s role in work-life integration issues: moving the workforce to a change in mindset. Hum Res Dev Int 6(1):57–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Presser HB (1995) Job, family, and gender: determinants of nonstandard work schedules among employed Americans in 1991. Demography 32(4):577–598

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Raghuram S, Wiesenfeld B (2004) Work-nonwork conflict and job stress among virtual workers. Hum Resour Manage 43(2/3):259–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ralston DA (1989) The benefits of flextime: real or imagined? J Organ Behav 10(4):369–373

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Reinsch NL (1997) Relationships between telecommuting workers and their managers: an exploratory study. J Bus Commun 34(4):343–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richman AL et al (2008) The relationship of perceived flexibility, supportive work-life policies, and use of formal flexible arrangements and occasional flexibility to employee engagement and expected retention. Community Work Fam 11(2):183–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson W (2005) Ethical considerations in flexible work arrangements. Bus Soc Rev 110(2):213–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogier SA, Padgett MY (2004) The impact of utilizing a flexible work schedule on the perceived career advancement potential of women. Hum Res Dev Q 15(1):89–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell H, O’Connell PJ, McGinnity F (2009) The impact of flexible working arrangements on work–life conflict and work pressure in Ireland. Gend Work Organ 16(1):73–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scandura TA, Lankau MJ (1997) Relationships of gender, family responsibility and flexible work hours to organizational commitment and job satisfaction. J Organ Behav 18(4):377–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schieman S, Glavin P (2008) Trouble at the border? Gender, flexibility at work, and the work-home interface. Soc Probl 55(4):590–611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoemaker M (2003) Identity in flexible organizations: experiences in Dutch organizations. Creat Innov Manag 12(4):191–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro M et al (2009a) Making sense of women as career self-agents: implications for human resource development. Hum Res Dev Q 20(4):477–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro M, Blake-Beard S, O’Neill R (2009b) Canaries in the mine shaft: women signaling a new career model. People Strategy 32(3):52–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Stavrou ET (2005) Flexible work bundles and organizational competitiveness: a cross-national study of the European work context. J Organ Behav 26(8):923–947

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanberg JE, Simmons LA (2008) Quality jobs in the new millennium: incorporating flexible work options as a strategy to assist working families. Soc Ser Rev 82(1):119–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanberg JE, Pitt-Catsouphes M, Drescher-Burke K (2005) A question of justice disparities in employees’ access to flexible schedule arrangements. J Fam Issues 26(6):866–895

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talukder MDMI (2003) The perception of professionals and management personnel on the virtual organization. J Comput Inf Syst 43(3):92–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Taskin L, Devos V (2005) Paradoxes from the individualization of human resource management: the case of telework. J Bus Ethics 62(1):13–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thom N, Blum A (1998) The structure of working hours in Swiss companies. Hum Res Manag J 8(3):77–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tremblay D-G, Genin É (2008) Permeability between work and non-work: the case of self-employed IT workers. Can J Commun 33(4):701–720

    Google Scholar 

  • Tremblay D-G, Paquet R, Najem E (2006) Telework: a way to balance work and family or an increase in work–family conflict? Can J Commun 31(3):715–731

    Google Scholar 

  • Voudouris I (2004) The use of flexible employment arrangements: some new evidence from Greek firms. Int J Hum Res Manage 15(1):131–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wajcman J et al (2010) Enacting virtual connections between work and home. J Sociol 46(3):257–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weeden KA (2005) Is there a flexiglass ceiling? Flexible work arrangements and wages in the United States. Soc Sci Res 34(2):454–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wellman B et al (1996) Computer networks as social networks: collaborative work, telework, and virtual community. Annu Rev Sociol 22(1):213–238

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Whalley P (2007) Managing teleworkers and telecommuting strategies. Bus Ethics Q 17(1):163–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson K, Brown M, Cregan C (2008) Job quality and flexible practices: an investigation of employee perceptions. Int J Hum Res Manage 19(3):473–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wylie E et al (2010) What influences work-family conflict? The function of work support and working from home. Curr Psychol 29(2):104–120

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Youngsoo J, Sungkwon W (2004) Flexible work breakdown structure for integrated cost and schedule control. J Constr Eng Manag 130(5):616–625

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Preliminary results of this study had been presented at the 7th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance in Seoul, Korea, October 22–25, and the 1st International Workshop on the Changing Nature of Work due to ICT in Milan, Italy, December 15, 2013. This work was partially supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea Grant funded by the Korean Government (NRF-2012S1A3A2033474).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center for Work Science, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea, Republic of (South Korea)

    Jungwoo Lee

Authors
  1. Jungwoo Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jungwoo Lee .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Center for Work Science, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea (Republic of)

    Jungwoo Lee

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lee, J. (2016). Drivers and Consequences in Transforming Work Practices. In: Lee, J. (eds) The Impact of ICT on Work. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-612-6_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation