Abstract
In many countries and regions, education authorities have shown interests in promoting new education initiatives or innovations. With the hefty investments, they are keen to see that their initiatives are well received by the various stakeholders, namely, national leaders, district-level leaders, school leaders, teachers, students and their parents, and can be successfully scaled and improve learning. However, are the perspectives and expectations of policymakers and practitioners with regard to education innovations and their scaling necessarily the same as those of the researchers? Some of these stakeholders may expect a linear model of scaling, i.e. innovations can be translated into ready intervention packages which can be replicated mechanically by all the practitioners and consequently uplifting learning outcomes within the nation. Others may expect extensive adaptation to be allowed for any education innovations accepted for scaling. This chapter describes an ecological model for scaling that allows for a productive tension due to the differences in stakeholder perspectives. Based on scaling practices and considerations that operate in Singapore, the lessons about how scaling can be advanced at the systems level, which may be relevant for school districts, regions or countries similar in size to Singapore, are drawn. The paper also attempts to distil underlying scaling principles that can provide some directions to help analyse or shape scaling strategies across a hierarchy of much larger scale levels.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Barab, S. L., & Luehmann, A. L. (2003). Building sustainable science curriculum: Acknowledging and accommodating local adaptation. Science Education, 87(4), 454–467.
Beach, K. (1999). Consequential transitions: A sociocultural expedition beyond transfer in education. Review of Research in Education, 24, 101–139.
Bocconi, S., Kampylis, P., & Punie, Y. (2013). Framing ICT-enabled innovation for learning: The case of one-to-one learning initiatives in Europe. European Journal of Education, 48(1), 113–130.
Clarke, J., & Dede, C. (2009). Design for scalability: A case study of the River City Curriculum. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(4), 353–365.
Coburn, C. E. (2003). Rethinking scale: Moving beyond numbers to deep and lasting change. Educational Researcher, 32(6), 3–12.
Dede, C. (2006). Scaling up: Evolving innovations beyond ideal settings to challenging contexts of practice. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of learning sciences (pp. 551–566). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Department of Statistics, Singapore (DOS). (2014). Yearbook of statistics, Singapore, 2014. Retrieved from http://www.singstat.gov.sg/publications/publications_and_papers/reference/yearbook_2014/yos2014.pdf
Dimmock, C., & Goh, J. W. (2011). Transformative pedagogy, leadership and school organisation for the twenty-first-century knowledge-based economy: The case of Singapore. School Leadership & Management, 31(3), 215–234.
eduLab. (2010). Java simulation design for teaching and learning. Unpublished proposal. Singapore: National Institute of Education, NTU.
Fullan, M. (2000). The return of large-scale reform. Journal of Educational Change, 1(1), 5–27.
Fullan, M., Hill, P., & Crevola, C. (2006). Breakthrough. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press/Sage.
Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage Publications Limited.
Glennan, T. K. J., Bodilly, S. J., Galegher, J. R., & Kerr, K. A. (2004). Expanding the reach of educational reforms: Perspectives from leaders in the scale-up of educational interventions. Santa Monica: RAND Corp.
Goh, C. T. (1997) Speech by Prime Minister Goh Chok Tong at the opening of the 7th international conference on thinking. Retrieved February 14, 2014, from http://www.moe.gov.sg/media/speeches/1997/020697.htm
Gopinathan, S. (1985). Education in Singapore: Progress and prospect. In J. S. T. Quah, H. C. Chan, & C. M. Seah (Eds.), Government and politics in Singapore (pp. 197–232). Singapore: Oxford Press.
Hargreaves, D. (2000). The production, mediation and use of professional knowledge among teachers and doctors: A comparative analysis. In OECD/CERI (Ed.), Knowledge management in a learning society (pp. 219–235). Paris: OECD.
Hargreaves, A., & Fink, D. (2000). The three dimensions of reform. Educational Leadership, 57(7), 30–34.
Heng, S. K. (2011). Opening Address by Mr Heng Swee Keat, Minister for Education, at the Ministry of Education (MOE) Work Plan Seminar, on Thursday, 22 September 2011 at 10.00 am at Ngee Ann Polytechnic Convention Centre. Extracted from http://www.moe.gov.sg/media/speeches/2011/09/22/work-plan-seminar-2011.php
Hogan, D. (2007). Policy-driven research and evidence-based educational innovation in Singapore. In OECD/CERI (Ed.), Evidence in education – Linking policy and research (pp. 131–144). Paris: OECD.
Hogan, D. (2011). Interim Core 2 report on classroom pedagogy. Unpublished Report, National Institute of Education, Singapore.
Hogan, D., & Gopinathan, S. (2008). Knowledge management, sustainable innovation, and pre‐service teacher education in Singapore. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 14(4), 369–384.
Hogan, D., Chan, M., Rahim, R., Kwek, D., Aye, K. M., Loo, S. C., Sheng, Y. Z., & Luo, W. (2013). Assessment and the logic of instructional practice in Secondary 3 English and mathematics classrooms in Singapore. Review of Education, 1(1), 57–106.
Hung, D., Lee, S. S., Teh, L. W., Kwan, Y. M., Vishnumahanti, S., & Widiastuti, A. (2014). An ecological perspective on scaling: Balancing structural and individual adaptivities. In D. Hung, K. Y. T. Lim, & S. Lee (Eds.), Adaptivity as a transformative disposition: For learning in the 21st century (pp. 267–285). Singapore: Springer.
Klinger, J. K., Boardman, A. G., & McMaster, K. L. (2013). What does it take to scale up and sustain evidence-based practices? Exceptional Children, 79(2), 195–211.
Ministry of Education, Singapore. (2008). More support for school’s “Teach less, learn more” initiatives. Extracted from http://www.moe.gov.sg/media/press/2008/01/more-support-for-schools-teach.php, on 23rd Feb 2014.
Mulford, B. (2003). School leaders: Challenging roles and impact on teacher and school effectiveness (OECD Commissioned Paper). Retrieved March 11, 2013, from http://www.oecd.org/edu/school/37133393.pdf
Murnane, R. J., & Nelson, R. R. (1984). Production and innovation when techniques are tacit: The case of education. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 5(1984), 353–373.
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.
Peurach, D. J., & Glazer, J. L. (2012). Reconsidering replication: New perspectives on large-scale school improvement. Journal of Educational Change, 13(2), 155–190.
Polanyi, M. (1967). The tacit dimension. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Shweder, R. A. (1980). Rethinking culture and personality theory: From genesis and typology to hermeneutics and dynamics. Ethos, 8, 60–94.
Sternberg, R. J., Birney, D., Jarvin, L., Kirlik, A., Stemler, S., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2006). From molehill to mountain: The process of scaling up educational interventions (First hand experience upscaling the theory of successful intelligence). In M. A. Constas & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Translating theory and research into educational practice – Developments in content domains, large-scale reform, and intellectual capacity (pp. 205–222). Mahwah: Routledge.
Sung, N. S., Crowley, W. F., Genel, M., Salber, P., Sandy, L., Sherwood, L. M., Johnson, S. B., Catanese, V., Tilson, H., Getz, K., Larson, E. L., Scheinberg, D., Reece, E. A., Slavkin, H., Dobs, A., Grebb, J., Martinez, R. A., Korn, A., & Rimoin, D. (2003). Central challenges facing the national clinical research enterprise. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 289(10), 1278–1287.
Teh, L. W. (2014). Singapore’s performance in PISA: Levelling up the long tail. In S. K. Lee, W. O. Lee, & E. L. Low (Eds.), Educational policy innovations – Levelling up and sustaining educational achievement (pp. 71–83). Singapore: Springer.
Teh, L. W., Hogan, D., & Dimmock, C. (2013). Knowledge mobilisation and utilisation in the Singapore Education System: The nexus between researchers, policy makers and practitioners. In B. Levin, J. Qi, H. Edelstein, & J. Sohn (Eds.), The impact of research in education: An international perspective (pp. 41–63). Bristol: The Policy Press.
The National Science Foundation. (2006). Innovative technology experiences for students and teachers (ITEST). Retrieved March 22, 2013, from http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2009/nsf09506/nsf09506.htm
Tushman, M. L. (1977). Special boundary roles in the innovation process. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22(4), 587–605.
University of Miami. (2013). University of Miami healthcare system. Retrieved from http://mscti.med.miami.edu/program/what-is-translational-research/
Westfall, J. M., Mold, J., & Fagnan, L. (2007). Practice-based research – “blue highways” on the NIH roadmap. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 297(4), 403–406.
Woolf, S. H. (2009). The meaning of translational research and why it matters. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 299(2), 211–213.
Wylie, E. C. (2008). Tight but loose: Scaling up teacher professional development in diverse contexts. Princeton: Educational Testing Service.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hung, D., Lee, SS., Teh, L.W. (2015). Scaling from the Perspectives of Policymakers and Practitioners from Singapore. In: Looi, CK., Teh, L. (eds) Scaling Educational Innovations. Education Innovation Series. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-537-2_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-537-2_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-287-536-5
Online ISBN: 978-981-287-537-2
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)