Skip to main content

Neo-pragmatist Philosophy of Education

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory
  • 451 Accesses

Synonyms

Edification; Holism; Instrumentalism; Problem-centered view; Redescription

Introduction

Neo-pragmatism refers to the developments of pragmatism of the early twentieth century originated by Charles Pierce, William James, and John Dewey. These developments are introduced by people like Nelson Goodman, Willard Van Orman Quine, Richard Rorty, Donald Davidson, Hilary Putnam, and Richard Bernstein. Neo-pragmatism shows an important development of the early pragmatism because of the emphasis that neo-pragmatism puts on language, which shows its accommodation to the linguistic turn in the philosophy of the twentieth century. While according to pragmatism action is what should be at stake, neo-pragmatism shows the importance of language in dealing with action. Thus, neo-pragmatism draws our attention to the roles description and redescription play in the actual change of problematic situations.

What makes neo-pragmatism important for education is the very emphasis it puts on language...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Evers, C. (1979). Analytic philosophy of education: From a logical point of view. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 12, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer, H. G. (1989). Truth and method. London: Sheed and Ward.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, R. S. (1966). Ethics and education. London: George Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, M., & Ghiraldelli, P. (2001). Richard Rorty: Education, philosophy, and politics. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W. V. O. (1966). The ways of paradox and other essays. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W. V. O. (1981). Theories and things. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R. (1979). Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R. (1982). Method, social science, and social hope. In Consequences of pragmatism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R. (1989). Education without dogmas. Dissent, Spring, 198–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R. (1994). Feminism and pragmatism. In The Tanner lectures on human values (Vol. 13). Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wain, K. (2001). Richard Rorty and the end of philosophy of education. In M. Peters & P. Ghiraldelli (Eds.), Richard Rorty: Education, philosophy, and politics. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, J. C., & Evers, C. W. (1988). The epistemological unity of educational research. In J. P. Keeves (Ed.), Educational research, methodology, and measurement: An international handbook (pp. 28–36). Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Khosrow Bagheri Noaparast .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this entry

Cite this entry

Noaparast, K.B. (2015). Neo-pragmatist Philosophy of Education. In: Peters, M. (eds) Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-532-7_145-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-532-7_145-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-287-532-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education

Publish with us

Policies and ethics