Skip to main content

Residual Strength Prediction of a Pipeline with Interacting Corrosion Defects Subjected to Combined Loading Using Artificial Neural Networks

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
ICPER 2020

Abstract

Predicting the failure pressure of corroded pipelines has long been a topic of great interest for researchers all around the world. There are several methods and guidelines available to estimate the failure pressures of pipelines with the most commonly used being DNV-RP-F101. However, despite being the most comprehensive method, neither DNV-RP-F101 nor any other widely used corrosion assessment methods consider interacting defects subjected to both internal pressure and longitudinal compressive stress, despite this scenario being extremely common in the real world. In this work, the relationship between interacting corrosion defects and applied loadings (internal pressure and longitudinal compressive stress) with the failure pressure of pipeline is investigated by predicting the failure pressure using an artificial neural network (ANN). Data regarding the failure pressure of pipelines with interacting defects and combined loading is collected from FEA and full-scale burst tests. These data are then fed to an artificial neural network, allowing it to provide appropriate results for new cases, i.e., for other defects, corrosion defect parameters and loadings. This research will provide a gateway to help predict the failure pressure of pipes with interacting corrosion defects subjected to both internal pressure and longitudinal compressive stress using ANN. The greatest advantage of utilizing an artificial neural network is its ability and ease to improve failure prediction accuracy. Over time, more failure data can be fed into the artificial neural network, allowing it to “learn”, thus being able to provide better failure pressure predictions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Benjamin A, Freire J, Vieira R (2007) Part 6: analysis of pipeline containing interacting corrosion defects. Exp Tech 31(3):74–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chauhan V, Swankie TD, Espiner R, Wood I (2009) Developments in methods for assessing the remaining strength of corroded pipelines. NACE international

    Google Scholar 

  3. Xu L, Cheng Y (2012) Reliability and failure pressure prediction of various grades of pipeline steel in the presence of corrosion defects and pre-strain. Int J Press Vessels Pip 89:75–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bjørnøy OH, Sigurdsson G, Marley MJ (2004) Updated DNV-RP-F101 for corroded pipelines, 2004. 2004 international pipeline conference, vol 1, 2 and 3

    Google Scholar 

  5. Terán G, Capula-Colindres S, Velázquez J, Fernández-Cueto M, Angeles-Herrera D, Herrera-Hernández H (2017) Failure pressure estimations for pipes with combined corrosion defects on the external surface: a comparative study. Int J Electroch Sci, 10152–10176

    Google Scholar 

  6. Andrade EQ, Benjamin AC, Machado PR, Pereira LC, Jacob BP, Carneiro EG, … Noronha DB (2006) Finite element modeling of the failure behavior of pipelines containing interacting corrosion defects. Vol 4: Terry Jones Pipeline Technology; Ocean Space Utilization; CFD and VIV Symposium

    Google Scholar 

  7. Li X, Chen Y, Zhou J (2010) Plastic interaction relations for corroded steel pipes under combined loadings. Earth and Space 2010

    Google Scholar 

  8. Silva R, Guerreiro J, Loula A (2007) A study of pipe interacting corrosion defects using the FEM and neural networks. Proceedings of the fourth international conference on engineering computational technology

    Google Scholar 

  9. Karuppanan S, Aminudin A, Wahab A (2012) Burst pressure estimation of corroded pipeline with interacting defects using finite element analysis. J Appl Sci 12(24):2626–2630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lee Y, Kim YP, Moon M, Bang WH, Oh KH, Kim WS (2005) The prediction of failure pressure of gas pipeline with multi corroded region. Mater Sci Forum 475–479:3323–3326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chen Y, Zhang H, Zhang J, Zheng W, Liu X, Liang L (2015) Failure analysis of X90 pipeline with circumferentially aligned interacting corrosion defects. Adv Energy Equip Sci Eng, 2141–2145

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mondal B, Dhar A (2017) Interaction of multiple corrosion defects on burst pressure of pipelines. Can J Civ Eng 44(8):589–597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Belachew CT, Ismail MC, Karuppanan S (2011) Burst strength analysis of corroded pipelines by finite element method. J Appl Sci 11(10):1845–1850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lee GH, Pouraria H, Seo JK, Paik JK (2015) Burst strength behaviour of an aging subsea gas pipeline elbow in different external and internal corrosion-damaged positions. Int J Naval Archit Ocean Eng 7(3):435–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhou T, Tian Y, Cassidy MJ (2018) Effect of tension on the combined loading failure envelope of a pipeline on soft clay seabed. Int J Geomech 18(10)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Smith MQ, Waldhart CJ (2000) Combined loading tests of large diameter corroded pipelines. vol 2: Integrity and Corrosion; Offshore Issues; Pipeline Automation and Measurement; Rotating Equipment

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ahammed M, Melchers R (1997) Probabilistic analysis of underground pipelines subject to combined stresses and corrosion. Eng Struct 19(12):988–994

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Barbosa A, Teixeira A, Soares C (2017) Strength analysis of corroded pipelines subjected to internal pressure and bending moment. Progress in the analysis and design of marine structures

    Google Scholar 

  19. Selig E, DiFrancesco L, McGrath T (1994) Laboratory test of buried pipe in hoop compression. Buried plastic pipe technology: 2nd vol

    Google Scholar 

  20. Schank R, Kass A (1990) Explanations, machine learning, and creativity. Mach Learn, 31–48

    Google Scholar 

  21. Alpaydin E (2014) Introduction to machine learning. Mit Press, Cambridge, MA

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Sen A (2012) Regression analysis: theory, methods, and applications. Springer

    Google Scholar 

  23. Osisanwo F, Akinsola J, Awodele O, Hinmikaiye JO, Olakanmi O, Akinjobi J (2017) Supervised machine learning algorithms: classification and comparison. Int J Comput Trends Technol 48(3):128–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. LeCun Y, Bengio Y, Hinton G (2015) Deep learning. Nature 521(7553):436–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kotsiantis S (2007) Supervised machine learning: a review of classification techniques. Informatica 31

    Google Scholar 

  26. Xhemali D, Hinde C, Stone R (2009) Naive Bayes vs. decision trees vs. Neural networks in the classification of training web pages. International J Comput Sci Issues 4

    Google Scholar 

  27. Addin O, Sapuan S, Mahdi E, Othman M (2007) A Naïve-Bayes classifier for damage detection in engineering materials. Mater Des 28(8):2379–2386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Russell S, Norvig P (2003) Artificial intelligence: a modern approach. Prentice Hall, London

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Mao W, Wang F-Y (2012) Cultural modeling for behavior analysis and prediction. Adv Intell Secur Inform, 91–102

    Google Scholar 

  30. Parikh KS, Shah TP (2016) Support vector machine—a large margin classifier to diagnose skin illnesses. Procedia Technol 23:369–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Towell G, Shavlik J (1993) Extracting refined rules from knowledge-based neural networks. Mach Learn 13(1):71–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Liu Z, Zhang Y (2001) A competitive neural network approach to web-page categorization. Int J Uncertainty Fuzziness Knowl Syst 9:731–741

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Tu JV (1996) Advantages and disadvantages of using artificial neural networks versus logistic regression for predicting medical outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol 50(11):1309–1310

    Google Scholar 

  34. Zhang G, Eddy Patuwo B, Hu MY (1998) Forecasting with artificial neural networks: the State of the Art. Int J Forecast 14(1):35–62

    Google Scholar 

  35. Reilly DL, Cooper LN (1990) An overview of neural networks: early models to real world systems. In: Zornetzer SF, Davis JL, Lau C (eds) An Introduction to Neural and Electronic Networks. Academic Press, New York, pp 227–248

    Google Scholar 

  36. Graupe D (2013) Principles of artificial neural networks. World Scientific, Singapore

    Book  Google Scholar 

  37. Zangenehmadar Z, Moselhi O (2016) Assessment of remaining useful life of pipelines using different artificial neural networks models. J Perform Constr Facil 30(5):04016032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Xu W, Li CB, Choung J, Lee J (2017) Corroded pipeline failure analysis using artificial neural network scheme. Adv Eng Softw 112:255–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Yayasan Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Malaysia (Grant number 015LC0-110).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Prasshanth Perumal .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Institute of Technology PETRONAS Sdn Bhd

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Perumal, P., Karuppanan, S., Ovinis, M. (2023). Residual Strength Prediction of a Pipeline with Interacting Corrosion Defects Subjected to Combined Loading Using Artificial Neural Networks. In: Ahmad, F., Al-Kayiem, H.H., King Soon, W.P. (eds) ICPER 2020. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-1939-8_55

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-1939-8_55

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-19-1938-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-19-1939-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics