Abstract
Predicting the failure pressure of corroded pipelines has long been a topic of great interest for researchers all around the world. There are several methods and guidelines available to estimate the failure pressures of pipelines with the most commonly used being DNV-RP-F101. However, despite being the most comprehensive method, neither DNV-RP-F101 nor any other widely used corrosion assessment methods consider interacting defects subjected to both internal pressure and longitudinal compressive stress, despite this scenario being extremely common in the real world. In this work, the relationship between interacting corrosion defects and applied loadings (internal pressure and longitudinal compressive stress) with the failure pressure of pipeline is investigated by predicting the failure pressure using an artificial neural network (ANN). Data regarding the failure pressure of pipelines with interacting defects and combined loading is collected from FEA and full-scale burst tests. These data are then fed to an artificial neural network, allowing it to provide appropriate results for new cases, i.e., for other defects, corrosion defect parameters and loadings. This research will provide a gateway to help predict the failure pressure of pipes with interacting corrosion defects subjected to both internal pressure and longitudinal compressive stress using ANN. The greatest advantage of utilizing an artificial neural network is its ability and ease to improve failure prediction accuracy. Over time, more failure data can be fed into the artificial neural network, allowing it to “learn”, thus being able to provide better failure pressure predictions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Benjamin A, Freire J, Vieira R (2007) Part 6: analysis of pipeline containing interacting corrosion defects. Exp Tech 31(3):74–82
Chauhan V, Swankie TD, Espiner R, Wood I (2009) Developments in methods for assessing the remaining strength of corroded pipelines. NACE international
Xu L, Cheng Y (2012) Reliability and failure pressure prediction of various grades of pipeline steel in the presence of corrosion defects and pre-strain. Int J Press Vessels Pip 89:75–84
Bjørnøy OH, Sigurdsson G, Marley MJ (2004) Updated DNV-RP-F101 for corroded pipelines, 2004. 2004 international pipeline conference, vol 1, 2 and 3
Terán G, Capula-Colindres S, Velázquez J, Fernández-Cueto M, Angeles-Herrera D, Herrera-Hernández H (2017) Failure pressure estimations for pipes with combined corrosion defects on the external surface: a comparative study. Int J Electroch Sci, 10152–10176
Andrade EQ, Benjamin AC, Machado PR, Pereira LC, Jacob BP, Carneiro EG, … Noronha DB (2006) Finite element modeling of the failure behavior of pipelines containing interacting corrosion defects. Vol 4: Terry Jones Pipeline Technology; Ocean Space Utilization; CFD and VIV Symposium
Li X, Chen Y, Zhou J (2010) Plastic interaction relations for corroded steel pipes under combined loadings. Earth and Space 2010
Silva R, Guerreiro J, Loula A (2007) A study of pipe interacting corrosion defects using the FEM and neural networks. Proceedings of the fourth international conference on engineering computational technology
Karuppanan S, Aminudin A, Wahab A (2012) Burst pressure estimation of corroded pipeline with interacting defects using finite element analysis. J Appl Sci 12(24):2626–2630
Lee Y, Kim YP, Moon M, Bang WH, Oh KH, Kim WS (2005) The prediction of failure pressure of gas pipeline with multi corroded region. Mater Sci Forum 475–479:3323–3326
Chen Y, Zhang H, Zhang J, Zheng W, Liu X, Liang L (2015) Failure analysis of X90 pipeline with circumferentially aligned interacting corrosion defects. Adv Energy Equip Sci Eng, 2141–2145
Mondal B, Dhar A (2017) Interaction of multiple corrosion defects on burst pressure of pipelines. Can J Civ Eng 44(8):589–597
Belachew CT, Ismail MC, Karuppanan S (2011) Burst strength analysis of corroded pipelines by finite element method. J Appl Sci 11(10):1845–1850
Lee GH, Pouraria H, Seo JK, Paik JK (2015) Burst strength behaviour of an aging subsea gas pipeline elbow in different external and internal corrosion-damaged positions. Int J Naval Archit Ocean Eng 7(3):435–451
Zhou T, Tian Y, Cassidy MJ (2018) Effect of tension on the combined loading failure envelope of a pipeline on soft clay seabed. Int J Geomech 18(10)
Smith MQ, Waldhart CJ (2000) Combined loading tests of large diameter corroded pipelines. vol 2: Integrity and Corrosion; Offshore Issues; Pipeline Automation and Measurement; Rotating Equipment
Ahammed M, Melchers R (1997) Probabilistic analysis of underground pipelines subject to combined stresses and corrosion. Eng Struct 19(12):988–994
Barbosa A, Teixeira A, Soares C (2017) Strength analysis of corroded pipelines subjected to internal pressure and bending moment. Progress in the analysis and design of marine structures
Selig E, DiFrancesco L, McGrath T (1994) Laboratory test of buried pipe in hoop compression. Buried plastic pipe technology: 2nd vol
Schank R, Kass A (1990) Explanations, machine learning, and creativity. Mach Learn, 31–48
Alpaydin E (2014) Introduction to machine learning. Mit Press, Cambridge, MA
Sen A (2012) Regression analysis: theory, methods, and applications. Springer
Osisanwo F, Akinsola J, Awodele O, Hinmikaiye JO, Olakanmi O, Akinjobi J (2017) Supervised machine learning algorithms: classification and comparison. Int J Comput Trends Technol 48(3):128–138
LeCun Y, Bengio Y, Hinton G (2015) Deep learning. Nature 521(7553):436–444
Kotsiantis S (2007) Supervised machine learning: a review of classification techniques. Informatica 31
Xhemali D, Hinde C, Stone R (2009) Naive Bayes vs. decision trees vs. Neural networks in the classification of training web pages. International J Comput Sci Issues 4
Addin O, Sapuan S, Mahdi E, Othman M (2007) A Naïve-Bayes classifier for damage detection in engineering materials. Mater Des 28(8):2379–2386
Russell S, Norvig P (2003) Artificial intelligence: a modern approach. Prentice Hall, London
Mao W, Wang F-Y (2012) Cultural modeling for behavior analysis and prediction. Adv Intell Secur Inform, 91–102
Parikh KS, Shah TP (2016) Support vector machine—a large margin classifier to diagnose skin illnesses. Procedia Technol 23:369–375
Towell G, Shavlik J (1993) Extracting refined rules from knowledge-based neural networks. Mach Learn 13(1):71–101
Liu Z, Zhang Y (2001) A competitive neural network approach to web-page categorization. Int J Uncertainty Fuzziness Knowl Syst 9:731–741
Tu JV (1996) Advantages and disadvantages of using artificial neural networks versus logistic regression for predicting medical outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol 50(11):1309–1310
Zhang G, Eddy Patuwo B, Hu MY (1998) Forecasting with artificial neural networks: the State of the Art. Int J Forecast 14(1):35–62
Reilly DL, Cooper LN (1990) An overview of neural networks: early models to real world systems. In: Zornetzer SF, Davis JL, Lau C (eds) An Introduction to Neural and Electronic Networks. Academic Press, New York, pp 227–248
Graupe D (2013) Principles of artificial neural networks. World Scientific, Singapore
Zangenehmadar Z, Moselhi O (2016) Assessment of remaining useful life of pipelines using different artificial neural networks models. J Perform Constr Facil 30(5):04016032
Xu W, Li CB, Choung J, Lee J (2017) Corroded pipeline failure analysis using artificial neural network scheme. Adv Eng Softw 112:255–266
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by Yayasan Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Malaysia (Grant number 015LC0-110).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 Institute of Technology PETRONAS Sdn Bhd
About this paper
Cite this paper
Perumal, P., Karuppanan, S., Ovinis, M. (2023). Residual Strength Prediction of a Pipeline with Interacting Corrosion Defects Subjected to Combined Loading Using Artificial Neural Networks. In: Ahmad, F., Al-Kayiem, H.H., King Soon, W.P. (eds) ICPER 2020. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-1939-8_55
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-1939-8_55
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-19-1938-1
Online ISBN: 978-981-19-1939-8
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)