Skip to main content

Open-Access Precipitation Networks and Machine Learning Algorithms as Tools for Flood Severity Prediction

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Climate Change and Water Security

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering ((LNCE,volume 178))

  • 856 Accesses

Abstract

During the past decades, convective rainfall in the Echaz catchment, which is characterized by steep topography and a high degree of urbanization, led to recurring flash floods. The high spatial and temporal variability of precipitation, in combination with the small drainage basin, contribute to low predictability and to the considerable damage potential of such events. The aim of this study is the development of a simple model to predict flood severity in the Echaz catchment. This model is based on open-access precipitation data from a personal weather station (PWS) network and water level measurements from a low-cost ultrasonic sensor. Machine learning classification methods (logistic regression and decision tree) are trained with observational data to determine maximum rainfall thresholds for different accumulation periods, ranging from 5 to 60 min. Hence, the proposed model uses multiple triggers to predict the exceedance of critical water levels. As a result, severe floods can be recognized earlier and with higher reliability, providing more response time for local authorities. Although the limited data availability increases the risk of overfitting and lower performance for the first upcoming events, the model quality will increase with the incorporation of new measurement data in the future. The reduced complexity and high interpretability of the model allow for a fast decision-making process. Additionally, the model has high potential and can easily be adapted to similar small catchments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. World Health Organization (2013) Floods in the WHO European region: health effects and their prevention. WHO Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  2. Blöschl G, Hall J et al (2017) Changing climate shifts timing of European floods. Science 357(6351):588–590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Blöschl G, Hall J et al (2019) Changing climate both increases and decreases European river floods. Nature 573:108–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Perera D, Seidou O et al (2019) Flood early warning systems: a review of benefits, challenges and prospects. UNU-INWEH, Hamilton

    Google Scholar 

  5. World Meteorological Organization (2013) Flood forecasting and early warning. In: Integrated flood management tool series no. 19

    Google Scholar 

  6. Vorogushyn S, Merz B (2013) Flood trends along the Rhine: the role of river training. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 17:3871–3884

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kundzewicz ZW (2013) Floods: lessons about early warning systems. In: Emerging lessons from ecosystems. European Environment Agency

    Google Scholar 

  8. Şen Z (2018) Flood modeling, prediction, and mitigation. Springer, Cham

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Borga M, Anagnostou EN et al (2011) Flash flood forecasting, warning and risk management: the HYDRATE project. Environ Sci Policy 14(7):834–844

    Google Scholar 

  10. Edwards PJ, Williard KW, Schoonover JE (2015) Fundamentals of watershed hydrology. J Contemp Water Res Educ 154:3–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. IPCC (2013) Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. In: Stocker TF, Qin D et al (eds) Contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of the intergovern-mental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  12. Blöschl G, Gaál L et al (2015) Increasing river floods: fiction or reality? WIREs Water 2:329–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ozturk U, Wendi D et al (2018) Rare flash floods and debris flows in southern Germany. Sci Total Environ 626:941–952

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lucía A, Schwientek M et al (2018) Planform changes and large wood dynamics in two torrents during a severe flash flood in Braunsbach, Germany 2016. Sci Total Environ 640–641:315–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Homagk P (1996) Hochwasserwarnsystem am Beispiel Baden-Württemberg. Geowissenschaften 14:539–546. Ernst & Sons GmbH, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  16. Versini PA, Berenguer M et al (2014) An operational flood warning system for poorly gauged basins: demonstration in the Guadalhorce basin (Spain). Nat Hazards 71:1355–1378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. World Meteorological Organization (1981) Flash flood forecasting. In: Operational hydrology report no. 18

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bárdossy A, Seidel J, Hachem AE (2020) The use of personal weather station observation for improving precipitation estimation and interpolation. Preprint Hydrol Earth Syst Sci

    Google Scholar 

  19. Norbiato D, Borga M et al (2008) Flash flood warning based on rainfall thresholds and soil moisture conditions: an assessment for gauged and ungauged basins. J Hydrol 362(3):274–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Georgakakos K (2006) Analytical results for operational flash flood guidance. J Hydrol 317(1):81–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hermann GR, Schumacher RS (2018) Flash flood verification: pondering precipitation proxies. J Hydrometeorol 19(11):1753–1776

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. University Corporation for Atmospheric Research (2011) Flash flood early warning system reference guide 2010. UCAR

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wehren B, Weingartner R et al (2010) General characteristics of alpine waters. In: Bundi U (ed) The handbook of environmental chemistry, vol 6. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 17–58

    Google Scholar 

  24. Davis RS (2001) Flash flood forecast and detection methods. In: Doswell CA (ed) Severe convective storms. Meteorological monographs no.50, pp 481–525

    Google Scholar 

  25. James G, Witten D et al (2013) Classification. In: An introduction to statistical learning. Springer texts in statistics, vol 103. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  26. James G, Witten D et al (2013) Tree-based methods. In: An introduction to statistical learning. Springer texts in statistics, vol 103. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Imagiire, L.O.K.M., Mester, B., Haun, S., Seidel, J. (2022). Open-Access Precipitation Networks and Machine Learning Algorithms as Tools for Flood Severity Prediction. In: Kolathayar, S., Mondal, A., Chian, S.C. (eds) Climate Change and Water Security. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 178. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5501-2_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5501-2_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-16-5500-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-16-5501-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics